Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

The sound of silence in humanitarian work

Gretchen Roedde
CMAJ January 08, 2013 185 (1) E83; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121164
Gretchen Roedde
Temiskaming Shores, Ont.
Roles: Family physician and global reproductive health consultant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Humanitarian Negotiations Revealed: The MSF Experience. Clare Magone, Michael Neuman, Fabrice Weismann, editors. C. Hurst and Co. Publishers Ltd.; 2012

Witnessing” and speaking out (témoignage) are important aspects of the work of Médecins Sans Frontières. As MSF celebrates 40 years of “independence,” this book also discusses the “sound of silence,” the necessary compromises MSF has made with repressive governments to allow it to do its humanitarian work. Eighteen contributors reflect self-critically on the costs and benefits of difficult choices using stories and clear helpful regional reference maps from Sri Lanka, Ethiopia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, the Gaza Strip, Myanmar, Nigeria, India, South Africa and France.

The ethical questions explored include: What principles should be open to negotiation? And how can MSF protect the organization’s mandate to judge for itself the “blurry but very real line beyond which assistance for victims imperceptibly turns into support for their tormentors”? At times, different branches of MSF have justified different choices. In Myanmar, the French left and the Dutch stayed on, changing their name to do so, and treating one million patients with tuberculosis, AIDS and malaria in one year. The Swiss spent four years getting permission to work in one region in Myanmar, then left the work to another nongovernmental organization when they discovered they had insufficient patient volume.

This book also provides an important context for international aid. The fact that malnutrition among infants and children under three is increasing in India in spite of increases in per capita income, shows social inequities persist and demonstrates the fragility of health progress in that sociopolitical climate. Even more delicate are the negotiations in frankly political situations such as the Gaza strip, Darfur and corrupt states in Nigeria.

Figure1
Image courtesy of C. Hurst & Co. Publishers Ltd.

This highly detailed book outlines the evolution of MSF’s underpinning ideology from neoconservatism to liberal internationalism, and the evolution of all of us working in international health. MSF’s position at the interface of these developments, including its political roles (lobbying for access to cheaper antiretroviral drugs) and crisis management (such as responding to natural disasters), is carefully critiqued.

Many of the stories are fascinating and compelling; this is clearly an insider’s look at history. However, I found much of the argumentation too long and the historical minutiae too intimate to maintain even a committed reader’s interest. In part, this may relate to the fact that much of the book has been translated. In addition, only an e-book was available to the reviewer, and given the dense and intense content, I would have preferred a print version. That said, this is an important book and reveals a high level of self-criticism within the organization, which is welcome.

The book comes at a time when MSF has just withdrawn from many years of engagement in southern Sudan. Reading this book I found it possible to imagine the behind-the-scenes negotiations that must have led to this difficult decision.

I would have liked to have seen more linkages to the comparable choices that all of us engaged in global health have had to make. When do development partners cut off aid if corruption is uncovered? Does this harm the innocent poor while those responsible may go unpunished? Do sector-wide supports to health make it more difficult to target priority spending and to engage non-state actors such as churches and non-government organizations? The world of MSF doesn’t delve into broader equally important negotiations, with male governments for women’s health, for example, or with dominant cultures for ethnic minorities’ rights to services.

I hope that this careful documentation will be a signpost for others to assess their tough choices. The leadership MSF has shown in making decisions so it can best serve its target groups is important given that many others engaged in the international arena are juggling their own political and economic self-interests in their humanitarian negotiations. This adds complexity to the choices that have to be made. This book helps to define and to highlight the true humanitarian space that primarily addresses the needs of others. It’s a welcome change.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 185 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 185, Issue 1
8 Jan 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The sound of silence in humanitarian work
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The sound of silence in humanitarian work
Gretchen Roedde
CMAJ Jan 2013, 185 (1) E83; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121164

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The sound of silence in humanitarian work
Gretchen Roedde
CMAJ Jan 2013, 185 (1) E83; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.121164
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The butterfly
  • Are we going to talk about it?
  • Grief on the phone
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical ethics
    • Humanitarian medicine

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire