Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression

Rachel Mann, Joy Adamson and Simon M. Gilbody
CMAJ May 15, 2012 184 (8) E424-E430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111213
Rachel Mann
From the Department of Health Sciences (Mann, Adamson, Gilbody), and the Hull York Medical School (Mann, Gilbody), University of York, York, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rcm504@york.ac.uk
Joy Adamson
From the Department of Health Sciences (Mann, Adamson, Gilbody), and the Hull York Medical School (Mann, Gilbody), University of York, York, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon M. Gilbody
From the Department of Health Sciences (Mann, Adamson, Gilbody), and the Hull York Medical School (Mann, Gilbody), University of York, York, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Tables

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1:
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1:

    Flow of patients through the study.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Characteristics of study participants

    CharacteristicNo. (%) of patients*
    n = 152
    Age, yr, mean (SD)27.4 (5.8)
    Ethnic background
     White British81 (53.3)
     White other5 (3.3)
     Mixed (white and black)4 (2.6)
     Mixed (white and South Asian)3 (2.0)
     Black6 (3.9)
     Indian5 (3.3)
     Pakistani38 (25.0)
     Bangladeshi5 (3.3)
     Other5 (3.3)
    Primiparous73 (48.0)
    Marital status
     Married, first marriage79 (52.0)
     Remarried10 (6.6)
     Single, never married60 (39.9)
     Divorced3 (2.0)
    Cohabitation
     Lives with baby’s father122 (80.3)
     Lives with another partner1 (0.7)
     In a relationship, not living with partner20 (13.2)
     Not in a relationship9 (5.9)
    Housing
     Owns house, paying mortgage/loan68 (44.7)
     Owns house outright13 (8.6)
     Rents54 (35.5)
     Lives rent free17 (11.2)
    Highest level of education
     None22 (14.5)
     High school35 (23.0)
     College or university31 (20.4)
     Postgraduate school49 (32.2)
     Other12 (7.9)
     No response3 (2.0)
    Employment status
     Currently employed94 (61.8)
     Previously employed34 (22.4)
     Never employed24 (15.8)
    Smoking status
     Current smoker22 (14.5)
     Former smoker42 (27.6)
     Never smoked88 (57.9)
    Self-reported history of diagnosed depression
     No prior diagnosis by general practitioner128 (84.2)
     ≥ 1 diagnosed episode of depression24 (15.8)
    • Note: SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Unless stated otherwise.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Performance of two case-finding questions (index test) and an additional question about the need for help in identifying perinatal depression

    MeasureAntenatal phasePostnatal phase
    Case-finding questions*
    n = 126†
    Question about need for help‡
    n = 52
    Case-finding questions*
    n = 94†
    Question about need for help‡
    n = 45
    True positive, no.1710187
    False negative, no.07011
    True negative, no.74324927
    False positive, no.353270
    Sensitivity, % (95% CI)100 (77–100)58 (38–76)100 (78–100)39 (18–64)
    Specificity, % (95% CI)68 (58–76)91 (78–97)65 (53–75)100 (85–100)
    Positive likelihood ratio (95% CI)3.03 (2.28–4.02)6.86 (2.16–21.7)2.73 (2.0–3.74)21.4 (1.3–354.2)
    Negative likelihood ratio (95% CI)0.041 (0.003–0.63)0.45 (0.25–0.80)0.042 (0.003–0.65)0.62 (0.43–0.90)
    • Note: CI = confidence interval.

    • ↵* There were no missing responses to the case-finding questions. A positive response to either of the two questions was considered a positive screen.

    • ↵† This is the number of women who also completed the telephone interview. A total of 152 women (antenatal phase) and 97 women (postnatal phase) answered the case-finding questions.

    • ↵‡ Responses to an additional question about the need for help were elicited only from participants with a positive response to either of the case-finding questions.

    • View popup
    Table 3:

    Characteristics of the 94 women who participated in the postnatal phase of the study and the 52 women who did not

    CharacteristicParticipation in postnatal phase; no. (%) of women*p value§
    Participated†
    n = 94
    Did not participate‡
    n = 52
    Age, yr, mean (SD)28.5 (6.2)25.4 (4.4)0.002
    White58 (62)25 (48)0.1
    Primiparous48 (51)21 (40)0.2
    Married60 (64)25 (48)0.06
    Living with baby’s father or another partner81 (86)38 (73)0.05
    House owner47 (50)18 (35)0.07
    Attended school (any level)76 (81)33 (64)0.02
    Currently employed65 (69)25 (48)0.01
    Nonsmoker during pregnancy¶84 (89)43 (83)0.3
    Self-reported history of ≥ 1 diagnosed episodes of depression16 (17)6 (12)0.4
    • Note: SD = standard deviation.

    • ↵* Unless stated otherwise.

    • ↵† Completed the questionnaire in both the antenatal and postnatal phases and completed the telephone interview.

    • ↵‡ Completed the questionnaire in the antenatal phase only (49 did not respond to any postnatal contact and 3 did not complete the postnatal telephone interview).

    • ↵§ Values were compared by means of the t test and χ2 test.

    • ↵¶ Includes former smokers and those who never smoked.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 8
15 May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
Rachel Mann, Joy Adamson, Simon M. Gilbody
CMAJ May 2012, 184 (8) E424-E430; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111213

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
Rachel Mann, Joy Adamson, Simon M. Gilbody
CMAJ May 2012, 184 (8) E424-E430; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111213
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Identification of depression in women during pregnancy and the early postnatal period using the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: protocol for the Born and Bred in Yorkshire: PeriNatal Depression Diagnostic Accuracy (BaBY PaNDA) study
  • Evaluation of ethnic disparities in detection of depression and anxiety in primary care during the maternal period: combined analysis of routine and cohort data
  • Diagnostic accuracy of the Whooley questions for the identification of depression: a diagnostic meta-analysis
  • It's time to put maternal suicide under the microscope
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Booster vaccination with inactivated whole-virus or mRNA vaccines and COVID-19–related deaths among people with multimorbidity: a cohort study
  • Association between virtual primary care and emergency department use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada
  • Survival and health care costs after inpatient elective surgery: comparison of patients with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Psychiatry & mental health: adult
    • Reproductive health, infertility & pregnancy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire