Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Landmark tool assesses Canadian hospitals

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ May 15, 2012 184 (8) 866; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4178
Lauren Vogel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

While the overall quality, safety and cost-effectiveness of care has improved in Canadian hospitals since 2007, there remain “substantial variations” in performance at the provincial, regional and facility levels, according to a ground-breaking database of clinical and financial data for some 600 institutions.

There were fewer deaths after major surgery, heart attack and stroke; fewer readmissions after heart attack, stroke, and hip and knee surgery; and fewer cases of in-hospital hip fracture in Canadian hospitals in 2010 than in 2007, according to the new Web-based resource released by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI).

But major anomalies are apparent in the data. For example, in fiscal 2010/11, 30-day in-hospital mortality rates after stroke were higher in Eastern Canada, where the maximum provincial rate was 20.4%, than in Western and Central Canada, where the maximum provincial rate was 15.9%.

The interactive benchmarking tool is aimed at helping hospitals better understand their performance in comparison with their peers (www.cihi.ca/CIHI-ext-portal/internet/en/documentfull/health+system+performance/indicators/performance/indicator_ent). It allows for comparison across 21 clinical indicators and nine financial indicators of hospital effectiveness, governance, patient safety and appropriateness and accessibility, using four years of national, provincial, regional and facility-specific data compiled as part of CIHI’s Canadian Hospital Reporting Project.

“As it stands today, it’s the most advanced tool of its kind in the world,” Jeremy Veillard, vice president for research and analysis at CIHI, asserted during an online technical briefing.

The Web-based resource is the first in Canada to include comprehensive comparative performance data for smaller facilities, which account for about 60% of hospitals in the country, he added. “Now, we’re making some headway in including every hospital in the discussion on performance, benchmarking and peer learning.”

The results show that about half of Canada’s facilities are performing at or above average on clinical indicators, Kira Leeb, director of health system performance at CIHI, told the technical briefing. Moreover, “we’ve seen about a 6.7% decrease in administration costs as a percentage of total costs across hospitals.”

Figure

A new Web-based benchmarking tool allows for comparison between hospitals across 21 clinical indicators and 9 financial indicators.

Image courtesy of © 2012 Thinkstock

Nevertheless, there are still “quite wide variations” between provinces, hospital peer groups and individual facilities, she added.

There was a twofold variation (4.9% to 8.2%) in provincial rates for 28-day readmission after stroke over the course of one year.

Administration costs also varied substantially by province, Leeb said. In 2009/10, “Ontario had the highest administration costs as a percentage of total costs at 5.9% and Alberta had the lowest percentage at 3.5%.”

There were also major variations by peer group. Large community hospitals, for example, experienced significantly lower-than-average 30-day readmission rates for all patient groups in 2010/11, as well as significantly lower rates of obstetric trauma, as compared with teaching hospitals and smaller community hospitals.

Teaching hospitals, though, comprised the only group with an elective C-section rate (23.9%) lower than the Canadian average (25.6%) in 2009/10.

There were also variations within peer groups. Most dramatically, mortality rates within five days of major surgery at large community hospitals varied from 2.2 per 1000 to 16.5 per 1000 in 2010/11 — an eightfold variation.

Similarly, the 28-day readmission rate after stroke in 2010/11 within teaching hospitals varied threefold (3.8% to 12.0%).

“Even within teaching hospitals, for example, you can have slight differences with the types of procedures and volumes they do,” says Jeanie Lacroix, manager of hospital reports at CIHI. “Variations can be related to a number of factors at the community level, [such as] how the hospital adheres to clinical practice guidelines, resource availability and effectiveness of treatment in the hospital.”

For that reason, the benchmarking tool includes facility and community profile information for each hospital so users can flesh out that context, she adds.

But ultimately, “no one measure can reflect all aspects of quality of care,” Lacroix says. “This is a starting point and we hope to work and develop more indicators so we can look at performance across more areas in the future.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 8
15 May 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Landmark tool assesses Canadian hospitals
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Landmark tool assesses Canadian hospitals
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ May 2012, 184 (8) 866; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4178

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Landmark tool assesses Canadian hospitals
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ May 2012, 184 (8) 866; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4178
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Appropriateness, effectiveness and safety of care delivered in Canadian hospitals: a longitudinal assessment on the utility of publicly reported performance trend data between 2012-2013 and 2016-2017
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire