Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Practice

Clinical shorts

Diane Kelsall
CMAJ March 20, 2012 184 (5) 561; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.120327
Diane Kelsall
MD MEd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Amoxicillin for acute rhinosinusitis

A 10-day course of amoxicillin offers little clinical benefit for most patients with clinically diagnosed uncomplicated acute rhinosinusitis. This is the conclusion of a trial that included 166 adults with moderate to very severe symptoms from uncomplicated, acute rhinosinutisis, who were randomized to receive a 10-day course of amoxicillin (1500 mg/d) or placebo administered in three doses per day. All received a supply of symptomatic treatments, including decongestants and saline spray. Disease-specific quality of life, using a validated score, was not significantly different between the two groups on day 3 (mean difference between amoxicillin and control groups 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.12 to 0.19) and on day 10 (mean difference between groups 0.01, 95% CI −0.13 to 0.15). At day 7, however, those in the treatment group reported slightly improved quality of life. Reported symptom improvement was not significantly different at day 3 and day 10, but similar to the quality-of-life findings, more participants treated with amoxicillin reported symptom improvement on day 7 (74% v. 56%, p = 0.02). See JAMA 2012;307:685–92.

Exercise for subacromial impingement syndrome

A specific exercise strategy that focuses on strengthening the rotator cuff and scapula stabilizers is effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients in whom conservative therapy for subacromial impingement syndrome has failed. In a randomized, blinded (participant and assessor) controlled trial, 102 adults with over six months of symptoms were randomized to receive either a specific exercise strategy or a program of unspecified movement exercises of the neck and shoulder. Both groups received five to six individual guided treatment sessions over 12 weeks, in addition to home exercises. All received a subacromial corticosteroid injection. At 12 weeks, there was significantly greater improvement in a validated score that assessed shoulder function and pain in the specific strategy group than in the control group (mean difference 15 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 to 20.6). More patients in the treatment group reported a successful outcome (odds ratio 7.6, 95% CI 3.1 to 18.9). A significantly lower proportion of those receiving specific exercises subsequently chose surgery (20% v. 63%, p < 0.001). See BMJ 2012;344: e787 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e787.

Prehospital treatment for status epilepticus

Intramuscular (IM) midazolam is at least as safe and effective as intravenous (IV) lorazepam for stopping prehospital seizures in patients experiencing status epilepticus. A double-blind, randomized noninferiority trial compared the two treatments in children and adults (n = 893) who were treated for status epilepticus by paramedics. At arrival at hospital, 73.4% of the IM midazolam group (329/448) and 63.4 % of the IV lorazepam group (282/445) had stopped having seizures without use of rescue therapy (absolute difference 10 percentage points, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0 to 16.1). Median time to active treatment was faster in the IM midazolam group than in the IV lorazepam group (1.2 min v. 4.8 min), but the onset of action was slower (median time from treatment to cessation of seizures 3.3 min v. 1.6 min), resulting in a similar overall interval to termination of seizures. Rates of endotracheal intubation and adverse events were similar in both groups. See N Engl J Med 2012;366: 591–600.

Figure
Image courtesy of © 2012 Thinkstock

Difference in blood pressure between arms

A difference of systolic blood pressure of 10 to 15 mm Hg or more between arms may help to identify patients who need further vascular assessment, and a difference of more than 15 mm Hg may be a useful indicator of increased risk of vascular disease and death. Twenty-eight trials were identified for a systematic review, 20 of which were included in a meta-analysis that looked at differences in systolic blood pressure between arms and the presence of central or peripheral vascular disease and mortality. A difference of 10 mm Hg or more was associated with subclavian stenosis (risk ratio [RR] 8.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6 to 21.2) in invasive studies using angiography, while noninvasive studies showed that a difference of 10 mm Hg or more (RR 2.4, 95% CI 1.5 to 3.9) or 15 mm Hg or more (RR 2.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 3.8) was associated with peripheral vascular disease. A difference of 15 mm Hg or more was also associated with pre-existing cerebrovascular disease, increased cardiovascular mortality and overall mortality. See Lancet 2012; DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61710-8.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 5
20 Mar 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical shorts
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical shorts
Diane Kelsall
CMAJ Mar 2012, 184 (5) 561; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120327

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Clinical shorts
Diane Kelsall
CMAJ Mar 2012, 184 (5) 561; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120327
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Amoxicillin for acute rhinosinusitis
    • Exercise for subacromial impingement syndrome
    • Prehospital treatment for status epilepticus
    • Difference in blood pressure between arms
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in pregnancy
  • Infantile perianal pyramidal protrusion
  • Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire