Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

Helping certain patients end their lives

Dennis Rosen
CMAJ December 11, 2012 184 (18) E983-E984; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.120089
Dennis Rosen
Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, Mass.
Roles: Assistant in Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Assisted Death: A Study in Ethics & Law. L.W. Sumner. Oxford University Press; 2011.

The Hippocratic oath clearly states: “I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asked, nor will I advise such a plan.” And yet, this happens all the time. According to the Attorney General of the High Council of the Netherlands, while 1.8% and 0.3% of all deaths in that country in 1990 were the result of euthanasia and assisted suicide, 17.5% of deaths were directly attributable to “alleviation of pain.” Similarly, a study in Australia found almost 31% of all deaths in that country in 1997 were hastened by opioids given to relieve pain.

Yes, one could argue, but the doctors who gave the terminal sedation did not intend for their patients to die; that was simply a (predictable) consequence of their attempts at pain control. Surely there must be some ethical distinction between administering an injection with the express intention of causing a patient’s death and doing so in order to relieve pain and suffering, even if that also leads to respiratory suppression and death?

Perhaps, says L.W. Sumner, professor emeritus of Law and Philosophy at the University of Toronto, but it is not consequential enough to really matter. He explains this through the stories of two men, Smith and Jones, who stand to inherit great fortunes should their six-year-old nephews die, and who both decide to drown their nephews during their nightly baths. Smith sneaks into the bathroom, drowns his nephew, and makes it look like an accident. Jones enters his nephew’s bathroom as well, but just as he does, the boy slips, strikes his head, and sinks under the water; Jones stands by and does nothing until he is certain that the child is dead. Each is guilty of his nephew’s death, one by active commission, the other by passively allowing it to happen. Marshaling this and other arguments, Sumner concludes that “when all relevant factors are equal, assisted death is not worse than either withholding/withdrawing treatment or the administration of opioids or sedative at dose levels that may hasten death.”

Figure
Image courtesy of Oxford University Press

Sumner believes that physicians do have a role to fill in helping certain patients end their lives, either through assisted suicide or voluntary euthanasia, provided certain conditions are met. These include the patient voluntarily requesting the physician to do so; being competent to make the request; understanding the diagnosis and all of the available treatment options for it; and being in a state of “intolerable suffering” which cannot be relieved except by measures which will also have the effect of hastening death.

Countering the argument that the human “right to life” is inalienable, Sumner argues not only that it can, but that it should indeed be waived under certain circumstances. “Denying the power of waiver seems inconsistent with the very function of rights,” he states, explaining that the theories about the function of rights govern the protection of choices and interests. Preventing a person suffering through the final stages of a terminal illness from choosing to end their agony and their life fulfills neither of these. Answering those who find virtue in suffering by claiming that it builds character, he writes: “while there may be some measure of truth to these claims […] it would be cruel to bring them into play for patients who are suffering through the dying process. For them, there will be no future goods to compensate for the present evil.”

Sumner points out that while assisted suicide and euthanasia generate a lot of controversy, terminal sedation, the cause of many more deaths, remains wholly unregulated despite it being just as prone to “slippery slopes, mistakes and abuses” as the others. Sumner proposes legalizing physician-assisted death, and points to growing support for this among the general public as well as by physician groups such as the Quebec College of Physicians.

The fact that Sumner is a philosopher, and not a physician (or professional politician) makes his perspective refreshing and very welcome. Ultimately, the conversations about end-of-life, assisted suicide, terminal sedation as well as those about allocation of increasingly scarce resources to the terminally ill will need to be held between representatives of different sectors of society. These include philosophers, ethicists, scientists, physicians, clergy, jurists and lay people, among others. Although Sumner does not link the two, the firestorm which erupted in the United States about “death panels” surrounding the proposal to fund end-of-life planning through Medicare as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act demonstrates how easily they can be. In order for society to reach consensus about end-of-life care it is important for citizens to feel their voices are being heard, and this will only happen if the discussion is broadened to include multiple outlooks.

In Assisted Death, Sumner meets the three rules he sets out for himself in the introduction to the book: being fair to one’s opponents; to the readers; and to the facts. The book is very well written, and certain to spark a lively debate. It is especially well-timed given the growing attention to end-of-life care here in North America in the last several years. Provocative in the best sense possible, it forces readers to confront their biases, fears and their own mortality and what they themselves might choose to do in circumstances similar to those discussed in the book.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (18)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 18
11 Dec 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Helping certain patients end their lives
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Helping certain patients end their lives
Dennis Rosen
CMAJ Dec 2012, 184 (18) E983-E984; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120089

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Helping certain patients end their lives
Dennis Rosen
CMAJ Dec 2012, 184 (18) E983-E984; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120089
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The most important outcome
  • Two goodbyes
  • How health care teams can help people with bedbugs: a patient’s perspective
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • End-of-life care & decisions

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire