Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Playing in the big leagues

Roger Collier
CMAJ November 06, 2012 184 (16) E833-E834; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4309
Roger Collier
CMAJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Clinical medicine — particularly dermatology and venereal diseases, and general and internal medicine — along with psychology and cognitive sciences, are among six research fields in which Canada punches above its international weight, according to the Council of Canadian Academies.

The council’s assessment, The State of Science and Technology in Canada, 2012, also indicates that there are several other biomedical research sub-fields in which the country is among the world’s top performers, including anatomy and morphology, areas in which Canada ranks first in the world in terms of Average Relative Citations scores, a bibliometric measure of quality.

Along with clinical medicine and psychology and cognitive sciences, Canada was also cast as a heavyweight in the fields of information and communication technologies, physics and astronomy, historical studies, and the visual and performing arts.

The overall picture indicates that science and technology in Canada is “healthy and growing in both output and impact,” according to an 18-member expert panel appointed by the council, a nonprofit organization that supports information-gathering to guide public policies (www.scienceadvice.ca/uploads/eng/assessments%20and%20publications%20and%20news%20releases/sandt_ii/stateofst2012_fullreporten.pdf).

Though home to less than 0.5% of the global population, Canada produces 4.1% of the scientific papers published worldwide — ranking 7th overall, sandwiched between France and Italy. The United States sits high above all other nations, publishing more than a quarter of all scientific papers. The report also states that a survey of roughly 5000 international researchers gave high marks to the quality of Canada’s scientific output, with 67% of respondents claiming research from Canada is strong in their fields. Furthermore, 37% said Canadian research was among the top five in their fields, putting Canada at fourth place overall in terms of reputation, after the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany.

Figure

Anatomy and morphology are among biomedical research sub-fields in which Canada is among the world’s top performers.

Image courtesy of © 2012 Thinkstock

“Not bad for a country with 33 million people,” says Dr. Eliot Phillipson, chair of the panel and Sir John and Lady Eaton Professor of Medicine Emeritus at the University of Toronto in Ontario. “We are playing in the major leagues, and we are in the premier league.”

But the report wasn’t entirely glowing. Some fields aren’t performing as well as in the past. Canada’s ability to commercialize or develop technologies from research discoveries remains relatively mediocre, while there’s a perception among many Canadian researchers that the environment isn’t as supportive as it once was.

In comparison with the council’s 2006 assessment of Canadian science, “real improvements have occurred in the magnitude and quality of Canadian S&T [science and technology] in several fields including Biology, Clinical Medicine, ICT [information and communication technologies], Physics and Astronomy, Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Public Health and Health Services, and Visual and Performing Arts,” the report states. But there’s been a real decline in research in the fields of natural resources and environmental sciences and environmental engineering. In those fields, “the declines that are seen are relative to the world: Canada is making gains in these areas, but not as fast as the world average.”

“In contrast to the nation’s strong performance in knowledge generation is its weaker performance in patents and related measures,” the report adds. “Despite producing 4.1 per cent of the world’s scientific papers, Canada holds only 1.7 per cent of world patents, and in 2010 had a negative balance of nearly five billion dollars in royalties and licensing revenues.” Meanwhile, the council’s survey of Canadian researchers indicated that half believed the country has lost ground in the past five years.

The findings are invaluable from a policy perspective, Phillipson says. “Every country nowadays does this type of periodic assessment. It’s important to assess this every few years, to see where we are and where we should be going.” The report pegs the most promising emerging areas of S&T as including wireless technologies and networking, information processing and computation, nanotechnologies and carbon nanotubes, digital media technologies, personalized medicine and health care, several energy technologies and tissue engineering.

But overall, Canada’s sterling reputation in the research world bodes well for its future, suggests Phillipson, and will likely lead to greater collaboration with international researchers. Canada’s rates of collaboration are already quite high with other leading nations, including China and Japan. “These collaborations are extremely important because research has become a global enterprise,” he says.

Perhaps the growing respect for Canadian research is one reason more top-tier researchers are coming to Canada. From 1997 to 2010, the country drew more researchers than it lost, particularly in fields such as clinical medicine, engineering and chemistry, states the report. The reversal of the brain drain of previous decades also bodes well for Canada, notes Phillipson. “Ultimately, research is about human capital.”

Within Canada, the four most populous provinces — Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia and Alberta — account for 97% of scientific papers published, as well as “the best performance in patent-related measures, and the highest per capita number of doctoral graduates.” Other provinces do, however, have pockets of strength in particular areas, including “Agriculture, Fisheries, and Forestry in Prince Edward Island and Manitoba; Historical Studies in New Brunswick; Earth and Environmental Sciences in Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia; and Biology in Saskatchewan.”

Ontario has the most faculty researchers and the largest scholarly output. The 15 960 faculty researchers in Ontario wrote 182 180 scientific papers from 2005 to 2010, more than double the amount produced by second-place Quebec. Faculty researchers in British Columbia were the most productive, though, with 13.2 publications per researcher over that period, followed by Alberta (12.3) and Ontario (11.4).

The positive picture also stands in stark contrast to the dismal performance in research and development in Canada’s private sector. A new report by the Conference Board of Canada, for example, states that Canada’s weak innovation performance is causing its global competitive ranking to slide (www.conferenceboard.ca/e-library/abstract.aspx?did=5101). In 2010, Canada ranked 10th but has now fallen to 14th place. Other reports released in recent years have also attested to Canada’s lagging innovation.

“Academic-based research is more important than ever in Canada as a result of the relatively low level of private sector research (compared to other industrialized countries) and the significant cuts to government science by the [Prime Minister Stephen] Harper government,” James Turk, executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, writes in an email. “Canada has an incredibly talented pool of academic scientists and researchers, as well as superb graduate programs training the next generation. The policies currently being followed are demoralizing the scientific community and leading some of our brightest young scholars to pursue their careers elsewhere.”

The council’s assessment of the current state of Canadian scientific affairs was based on a variety of methodologies, including bibliometrics, a bibliometric cluster analysis, technometrics (patent statistics and indicators), as well as surveys of Canadian science and technology experts and of 5154 respondents from more than 40 countries to an email questionnaire submitted to 44 868 of the world’s most cited authors by EKOS Research Associates Inc. “Each recipient was asked to (a) identify their field and sub-field of research, (b) identify the top five countries in the world in their sub-field of research, (c) rate Canada’s overall research strength in their sub-field, and (d) identify any world-leading research facilities or programs in Canada in their field.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 16
6 Nov 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Playing in the big leagues
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Playing in the big leagues
Roger Collier
CMAJ Nov 2012, 184 (16) E833-E834; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4309

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Playing in the big leagues
Roger Collier
CMAJ Nov 2012, 184 (16) E833-E834; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4309
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Research methods & statistics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire