Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

India’s “rural doctor” proposal stirs criticism

Soumyadeep Bhaumik and Tamoghna Biswas
CMAJ September 04, 2012 184 (12) E637-E638; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4253
Soumyadeep Bhaumik
Kolkata, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tamoghna Biswas
Kolkata, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

India is no exception to the adage that the thoroughly trained modern physician isn’t generally inclined to set up a shingle in a remote, rural region of a nation. But in a bid to resolve its severe shortage of medical professionals willing to toil in rural areas, the government has proposed to overcome that truism by creating a new category of physician called the “rural doctor,” whose training won’t be as intensive and thorough but who, theoretically, will be more willing to practice far from the beaten path.

Critics, though, are lambasting the notion of doctors providing health care despite having had two years less training than those who’ve spent 5.5 years in medical school to obtain a Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery degree.

Such a “sharply truncated” medical education will only produce “registered quacks,” says Dr. Kunal Saha, president of the People for Better Treatment, a nongovernmental organization working to eradicate medical negligence and promote corruption-free health care in India. “Don’t we already have a lot of quacks in rural India?”

With a population of more than 1.2 billion people, India has long suffered from a scarcity of doctors, nurses, health workers and public health professionals. “Against a desirable rate of 1 doctor per 1000 population, we have 1 doctor per 2000 people. Against a norm of 3 nurses per doctor, we have 3 nurses for every 2 doctors,” Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said a recent address (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=85099). “This shortage is acute in our rural areas and in particular, in the northern, central and eastern regions of the country.”

The government’s solution?

A 3.5-year course in medicine that results in bestowal of a “Bachelor of Rural Health Care” that entitles its holder to practise in a village (http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=82518).

But Saha argues that’s a violation of a constitutional right that states “no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.”

Figure1

For many residents of India, it is indeed a long way to Mumbai, which has prompted the government to create a “Bachelor of Rural Health Care” program in hopes of resolving acute physician shortages in the northern, central and eastern regions of the country.

Image courtesy of © 2012 Thinkstock

“Are the lives of rural Indians less valuable so that they may allow to be treated by half-baked registered quacks?” Saha asks.

The proposal is equally unpopular with the Indian Medical Association (IMA), which was so outraged by the notion that it called for a one-day nationwide strike on the issue earlier this year. While conceding that many physicians don’t want to work in villages, the IMA says the problem of poor health care in rural areas extends well beyond a shortfall in health human resources to include such factors as poor sanitation and inadequate access to clean drinking water.

Saha finds that gesture of protest a step beyond the pale. “While the association has legitimate claims against the government’s mindless implementation of health care laws and acts … to protest against the government by holding the defenseless patients at ransom is vividly wrong — morally, ethically and legally,” he says.

Within that context, Saha’s group filed public interest litigation in the Supreme Court of India charging that the strike was a violation of the Medical Council of India regulations and a betrayal of the Hippocratic Oath. It was a bit of grandstanding, to be sure, given that his organization was seeking an injunction to a one-day strike that was practically over, and all but impossible to enforce, even had it been granted. It was also somewhat moot as, in most states, doctors responded tepidly to the IMA’s call for a strike and opted instead to wear black badges in support of the call or to participate in rallies or meetings late in the day.

Others, meanwhile, question the motivations behind opposition to the new category of physicians and argue that the shortage in rural areas is such that creative solutions have become vital.

If there is no “radical change in the development paradigm of the country, and rural areas continue to lag behind the urban areas, doctors are not going to go to villages, period,” says Dr. Yogesh Jain, a member of the Medical Council of India committee that is crafting the curriculum for the so-called rural doctors programs. “This deficit in terms of rural health care has to be filled up, and this three-and-a-half-year course offers an opportunity. Social appropriateness would be ensured by picking up students from the same district where they get trained and then posted.”

Jain coolly notes that physicians have been remarkably silent about inferior care in rural villages in the past. Where, he asks, has “this equity concern been lurking when one talks about provision of determinants of health for rural and tribal people, such as safe water, well-equipped hospitals as opposed to poorly functioning health centres, all-weather roads and public transport on them, or ability to draw loans on non-usurious rates for common emergency illnesses? Suddenly when higher education and employment comes up, then we rally against any sort of positive discrimination? Why? Someone should speak up for positive reaffirmation for rural health care needs. Support for a new invigorated medical curriculum is one such technical affirmation.”

Others note that current medical curriculum in Indian medical schools has done little to promote rural practice.

“The existing medical education does not prepare the medical graduates to work for the community,” says Dr. Raman Kumar, president of the Academy of Family Physicians, which is working with several other bodies to develop a consensus statement on needed medical education reforms.

The time may have come for India to examine other models of providing care in rural areas, such as that of Brazil, where teams are made responsible for a given number of families in a well-defined geographic area, Raman says. In such a system, he adds, “medical graduates are prepared to work in the primary care setting in rural, urban as well as remote locations.”

Proponents acknowledge that there’s no guarantee that newly minted “rural doctors” won’t eventually pack their bags for more lucrative practices in urban centres. But Jains hopes that “proper selection, system support and appropriate monitoring can ensure that they continue in the rural areas from where they emerge.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 12
4 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
India’s “rural doctor” proposal stirs criticism
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
India’s “rural doctor” proposal stirs criticism
Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Tamoghna Biswas
CMAJ Sep 2012, 184 (12) E637-E638; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4253

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
India’s “rural doctor” proposal stirs criticism
Soumyadeep Bhaumik, Tamoghna Biswas
CMAJ Sep 2012, 184 (12) E637-E638; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4253
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Trudeau promises to boost federal health transfers when the pandemic is over
  • Does shaming have a place in public health?
  • Should Canada aim for #CovidZero?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire