Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Consent requirements for pelvic examinations

Margaret L. Morris
CMAJ September 04, 2012 184 (12) 1393; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.112-2061
Margaret L. Morris
The Association of Academic Professionals in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ottawa, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The board of the Association of Academic Professionals in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (APOG, formerly the Association of Professors of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of Canada) wishes to respond to the CMAJ article by Gibson and Downie,1 which revisits the issue of consent prior to pelvic examination. As the academic organization responsible for support for the academic missions in undergraduate and postgraduate training in obstetrics and gynecology, we have serious concerns.

“Medical trainees” was changed to “medical students” in the revised guidelines,2 which identifies the medical student’s role in pelvic examination as a learner. The new document is patient-focused and clearly defines informed consent on the part of the medical student and the entire gynecologic surgical team. The document ensures that patients are fully informed about the medical student’s role as a learner during clinical care and that patients may opt out of being a participant in the teaching of pelvic examination skills.

Gibson and Downie1 expressed concerns about the comprehensiveness of the guideline with regard to the exclusion of residents as medical trainees. Residents are physicians who are qualified medical practitioners and are deemed to have developed their pelvic examination skills to the point where they are able perform them independently — as well as offer supervision to learners. Residents are employed under contract by provincial bodies responsible for residency programs. Under ethical obligations set down by provincial governing bodies, qualified physician residents provide care only with patient consent. Residents certainly continue to learn and acquire experience as do all obstetrician–gynecologists who have already completed their training. The principle of lifelong learning is important for all physicians.

Our Association welcomes input and membership from all interested stakeholders including those from the legal community. We strive to achieve the best possible care for women in the academic environment, while fulfilling our commitment to ensure all health professionals providing care for women are adequately trained. Ideally, this should be carried out in a safe environment for both the learner and the patient without needlessly raising anxiety in the public and putting the clinical academic process in jeopardy. A collaborative approach between legal colleagues and physicians would be much more productive toward achieving this goal.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gibson E,
    2. Downie J
    . Consent requirements for pelvic examinations performed for training purposes. CMAJ 2012;184:1159–61.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Liu KE,
    2. Shapiro J,
    3. Robertson D,
    4. et al
    . Pelvic examinations by medical students. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010;32:873–5. Available: www.sogc.org/guidelines/documents/gui246PS1009E000.pdf (accessed 2011 Apr. 27).
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 12
4 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consent requirements for pelvic examinations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Consent requirements for pelvic examinations
Margaret L. Morris
CMAJ Sep 2012, 184 (12) 1393; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112-2061

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Consent requirements for pelvic examinations
Margaret L. Morris
CMAJ Sep 2012, 184 (12) 1393; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112-2061
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The authors respond
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Highlighting obesity as a risk factor for endometrial cancer
  • Hepatitis B vaccination for Canadian children: time for an adult conversation
  • Codesigning a public health approach to preventing firearm-related suicide deaths with rural communities
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire