Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Consent requirements for pelvic examinations

Robert Byrick
CMAJ September 04, 2012 184 (12) 1393; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.112-2060
Robert Byrick
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, Toronto, Ont.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Re:Accountability of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for their policies
    Robert Byrick
    Posted on: 11 September 2012
  • Accountability of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for their policies
    Ian A. Cameron
    Posted on: 07 September 2012
  • Posted on: (11 September 2012)
    Page navigation anchor for Re:Accountability of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for their policies
    Re:Accountability of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for their policies
    • Robert Byrick, President

    The College policy "Professional Responsibilities in Postgraduate Medical Education" relates to examinations performed solely for educational purposes and specifically states that "an examination is defined as "solely" educational when it is unrelated to or unnecessary for patient care or treatment." For example, if an examination for the purposes of a clinical demonstration was going to be performed while a patient was...

    Show More

    The College policy "Professional Responsibilities in Postgraduate Medical Education" relates to examinations performed solely for educational purposes and specifically states that "an examination is defined as "solely" educational when it is unrelated to or unnecessary for patient care or treatment." For example, if an examination for the purposes of a clinical demonstration was going to be performed while a patient was under sedation, consent would need to be obtained prior to the examination. This does not apply to the scenario posed by Dr. Cameron as the policy does not relate to situations where the examination is necessary for patient care or treatment.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (7 September 2012)
    Page navigation anchor for Accountability of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for their policies
    Accountability of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for their policies
    • Ian A. Cameron, MD

    Robert Byrick MD, as President of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, wrote a letter in the CMAJ 184(12)under the title Consent requirements for pelvic examinations. In his letter he states that, "express consent of the patient must be obtained (whether the patient is conscious during the examination). [?] The policy also clearly states that if, for any reason, express consent cannot be obtained, the exa...

    Show More

    Robert Byrick MD, as President of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, wrote a letter in the CMAJ 184(12)under the title Consent requirements for pelvic examinations. In his letter he states that, "express consent of the patient must be obtained (whether the patient is conscious during the examination). [?] The policy also clearly states that if, for any reason, express consent cannot be obtained, the examination cannot be performed." I have two questions for Dr. Byrick based on the following scenario: a 23 year old female patient presents in an emergency room with an acute lower abdominal pain, in shock, unconscious and unable to give consent for a pelvic exam. Is your policy flexible enough to permit a pelvic exam under these circumstances? And if the patient died while the doctor was diligently searching for the next of kin to give consent for the pelvic exam, could the family sue you and the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario for negligence for exercising "the authority to hold physicians accountable" for a poorly worded or inflexible policy?

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 12
4 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Consent requirements for pelvic examinations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Consent requirements for pelvic examinations
Robert Byrick
CMAJ Sep 2012, 184 (12) 1393; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112-2060

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Consent requirements for pelvic examinations
Robert Byrick
CMAJ Sep 2012, 184 (12) 1393; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.112-2060
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Perspectives on consent
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Virtual care and emergency department use
  • The denial of racism is racism itself
  • An expanded role for blood donor emerging pathogens surveillance
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire