Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Graduated drivers’ licences for seniors: reclaiming one benefit of being young

Donald A. Redelmeier and Matthew B. Stanbrook
CMAJ July 10, 2012 184 (10) 1123; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.120521
Donald A. Redelmeier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Stanbrook
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Many will reach a point in life where they become unable to operate heavy machinery safely. Cars are the ubiquitous example. Some seniors remain excellent drivers, but others accumulate medical comorbidities, cognitive impairments or physical frailties that can make them a hazard to themselves and other road users. Of the 2209 Canadians who died in motor vehicle accidents in 2009, 389 were over age 65, a higher incidence than any other age group and far higher than those half their age.1 For every death, an additional 35 individuals were injured.1

The relation between advanced age and driving risk is complex and influenced by individual contributing factors, as Hauer thoughtfully argues in his commentary in CMAJ.2 Nevertheless, some seniors keep driving despite substantial physical or mental deterioration that makes them medically unfit to drive. For example, about one in four Canadians over 65 with dementia retain a driver’s licence, and about one in five continue to drive regularly.3 Such statistics have aroused public concerns and prompted government action because dangerous driving imposes risks on others.4

Frail patients in past decades often relinquished driving because the physical demands were exhausting. In contrast, new advances in vehicle technology (e.g., power steering, power brakes, power seats) have made driving increasingly popular among those who may be increasingly less capable.

Mandatory road testing, physician-based screening and other proposed solutions to this problem have proved controversial in terms of accuracy, fairness, feasibility, affordability or adherence. In the interim, restriction of licences throughout Canada generally occurs only after accumulation of moving violations. This approach is often too late to prevent injuries. Pre-emptive approaches based on reporting of medically unfit drivers by physicians is a more proactive approach, yet is marked by low adherence even when such reporting is mandatory.5

A look at the other end of the age spectrum might offer a better solution. Graduated licensing programs for young drivers have shown surprising effectiveness for preventing motor vehicle crashes.6 Typical restrictions disallow driving at night, on high-speed roads or with any blood alcohol concentration. The result has been a 20%–40% reduction in serious road trauma in this age group, which in Canada amounts to preventing about 100 teen deaths each year.

The compelling benefits to young drivers suggest that a policy of graduated licensing for seniors also deserves serious consideration. With this approach, a full driver’s licence defaults automatically to a restricted licence that allows seniors to continue to drive only under relatively favourable road conditions. Just like graduated licences for young drivers, the principle is to prevent trauma rather than to await a series of incidents before taking any action. The optimal transition time would be debatable, but might be based on a specific age, retirement or other benchmarks.

Graduated licensing must allow exemptions for seniors who show good health as certified by their physician. This reframes the interaction by placing the physician in a positive position of endorsing a full driver’s licence, rather than always being in the negative position of initiating a restricted licence. This approach is logically no different from existing procedures whereby physicians certify eligibility for a disabled parking permit. Physicians could inform their judgment by employing external tools (some of which are being actively studied currently) for fitness-to-drive determinations.

Placing the onus on patients to seek a medical exemption would likely be more effective than relying on others to start discussions about medical suspension. The existence of a restricted licence option might further alleviate the polarizing all-or-none approach that hampers the fulsome reporting of medically unfit drivers of all ages. Moreover, an opt-out rather than opt-in approach to licensing is congruent with existing safety policies for aviators, vaccination programs for children and commercial driver testing.

Graduated licences work to keep young drivers safe. Let’s extend the same benefits to seniors.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared by Donald Redelmeier. See www.cmaj.ca/site/misc/cmaj_staff.xhtml for Matthew Stanbrook.

References

  1. ↵
    Canadian motor vehicle traffic collision statistics: 2009. Ottawa (ON): Transport Canada; 2009. Available: www.tc.gc.ca/eng/roadsafety/tp-tp3322-2009-1173.htm (accessed 2012 Mar. 13).
  2. ↵
    1. Hauer E
    . In defence of older drivers. CMAJ 2012;184:E305–6.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Turcotte M
    . Profile of seniors’ transportation habits. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada; 2012. Cat. no. 11-008-X.
  4. ↵
    1. Welsh M,
    2. Sher J
    . Ontario says tougher rules expected for drivers with dementia. The Toronto Star. 2012 Feb. 21. Available: www.thestar.com/news/canada/politics/article/1134253--ontario-says-tougher-rules-expected-for-drivers-with-dementia (accessed 2012 Mar. 12).
  5. ↵
    1. Redelmeier DA,
    2. Venkatesh V,
    3. Stanbrook MB
    . Mandatory reporting by physicians of patients potentially unfit to drive. Open Med 2008;2:e8–17.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Shope JT
    . Graduated driver licensing: review of evaluation results since 2002. J Safety Res 2007;38:165–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 184 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 184, Issue 10
10 Jul 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Graduated drivers’ licences for seniors: reclaiming one benefit of being young
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Graduated drivers’ licences for seniors: reclaiming one benefit of being young
Donald A. Redelmeier, Matthew B. Stanbrook
CMAJ Jul 2012, 184 (10) 1123; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120521

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Graduated drivers’ licences for seniors: reclaiming one benefit of being young
Donald A. Redelmeier, Matthew B. Stanbrook
CMAJ Jul 2012, 184 (10) 1123; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.120521
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Are doctors all-powerful?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Le sujet de l’heure : l’accès aux soins de santé au Canada
  • Integration of midwifery care in Canada
  • CMAJ’s new guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in research articles
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Family medicine, general practice, primary care
    • Geriatric medicine

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire