Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Analysis

Concussion in youth ice hockey: It’s time to break the cycle

L. Syd M. Johnson
CMAJ May 17, 2011 183 (8) 921-924; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110282
L. Syd M. Johnson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: syd.johnson@dal.ca
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

See article by Benson and colleagues on page 905 and at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.092190 and commentary by Sojka on page 887 and at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.110504.

Pittsburgh Penguins captain Sidney Crosby suffered a hard blow to the head in a blind-side collision during the 2011 Winter Classic hockey game. He crashed to the ice, staggered to his feet and slowly left the rink. In a game a few days later, Crosby was slammed against the boards, fell to the ice and exited the game.1 He’s been sidelined indefinitely with a concussion and, according to the concussion protocols of the National Hockey League (NHL), can’t return to the game until he’s free of symptoms.2

Crosby has a lot of company in the NHL, where the number of concussions doubled in the 2010/11 season.3 The NHL commissioner attributes the increase in concussions to accidental hits: players being struck by pucks, colliding with teammates, or striking the ice or the boards after being hit legally.3 The fact is that the vast majority of concussions, and hockey injuries overall, at all levels of play, are caused by legal bodychecking.4–8 It’s safe to say that as long as bodychecking is a part of ice hockey, a high rate of concussions will also be a part of hockey. Neither of the blows suspected of causing Crosby’s concussion were illegal. That’s important — concussion is not a problem the NHL can solve without radically modifying the sport’s rules of contact.

Concussion in youth ice hockey

The NHL’s problem with concussions is just the tip of the iceberg; concussion is all too common in youth ice hockey, with evidence that, despite educational efforts, the number of concussions continues to be substantially under-reported.4,9,10 A study published in late 2010 found an alarming rate of concussions in junior hockey.9 In the prospective study, which involved two teams of hockey players aged 16–21 years, 17 of 67 players sustained a concussion during a single season, with five of those players also suffering a second concussion. That is, 25.3% of players sustained at least one concussion in a single season, a rate of concussion seven times higher than the highest rate previously reported in the literature.9

An estimated half-million youths play organized minor ice hockey in Canada.11 The pediatric population is known to be more vulnerable to concussion and to experience more serious short-and long-term symptoms of concussion than adults.12–15 Youth athletes with concussion may experience fatigue, inattention, lack of concentration, memory loss and headaches, which can have devastating effects on both athletic and academic performance.12–16 Subtle cognitive deficits may persist for up to a year in some youths.16 Youth athletes who sustain minor brain trauma are also at risk for so-called second-impact syndrome, a rare but catastrophic neurologic condition that is almost always fatal.17 A history of concussion results in substantially increased susceptibility to additional concussions and more severe symptoms of concussion.18

Repeat concussions are also a risk factor for chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), which is associated with a spectrum of sequelae including memory loss, behavioural and personality changes, depression, early dementia and motor neuron disease.19 In one-half of the confirmed instances of CTE in athletes, symptoms developed within four years of the athletes stopping play.19 Subconcussion impacts of the kind common in contact and collision sports, such as hockey and tackle football, are also implicated in CTE. The deposition of tau proteins indicative of CTE have been found on autopsy in the brains of American football players with no history of concussion, as well as athletes as young as 18 years old.20 Concussion causes detectable but subtle symptoms and can be diagnosed by properly trained and vigilant physicians, trainers and coaches, but subconcussion impacts cause silent, invisible, lifelong damage to the brains of youth athletes.

The role of bodychecking

Bodychecking is a major cause of serious injury, including concussion, in hockey players.4,21,22 The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that bodychecking be prohibited for children younger than 15 years.23 Among the reasons cited by the academy is that there can be pronounced variations in body size, physical maturity and strength among players in younger age groups, resulting in heightened risk to smaller players who are matched against much larger players in the same age bracket.23

The more conservative recommendation of the Canadian Academy of Sports and Exercise Medicine calls for bodychecking to be eliminated from all levels of minor hockey “which are not designed as training for professional and international ranks,” and only beginning in elite Rep or All Star leagues in the 16- to 17-year (Midget level) age group.24 Hockey Canada, the governing body of minor hockey, allows body-checking at the Peewee level (ages 12–13) and above for male players; the Saskatchewan, Ontario and Ottawa hockey leagues permit bodychecking at the Atom level (ages 9–10) on an experimental basis. Quebec permits body-checking at the Bantam level (ages 14–15).25 Quebec is the only province in Canada that has seen growth, rather than decline, in the number of children playing minor hockey, a trend that has been attributed in part to the late introduction of bodychecking.26

Hockey Canada’s position is that checking skills are critical to the game of hockey and that “players must learn and master all aspects of the checking game to become effective and complete players.”25 A 2004 study sponsored by the Canadian Hockey Association (now Hockey Canada) concluded that bodychecking “can be taught at the younger age levels in a manner that does not lead to a higher incidence of injuries.”27 Several studies have confirmed, however, that injury rates rise dramatically when bodychecking is introduced,5–7,21,28 that players typically sustain their first concussion within a year of starting bodychecking4 and that education in “proper” bodychecking technique does not reduce rates of injury.6 The evidence strongly suggests that substantial harm may result from teaching youth players bodychecking at an earlier age.5,6,28

USA Hockey, the governing body for minor hockey in the United States, permits bodychecking at the Peewee level (ages 11–12), but is currently considering a rule change to raise the age to the Bantam level (ages 13–14), based on a recommendation by the USA Hockey Player Development Sub-committee on Body Checking.29 The proposed change is motivated by two factors. First, skill development is hindered when bodychecking is introduced, because players focus on hitting and avoiding being hit rather than on skating, puck- and stick-handling, receiving, shooting and other hockey skills.29 The subcommittee argues that players will benefit from two more years of skill development, unhindered by bodychecking.29 This is in contrast to Hockey Canada’s assertion that training in bodychecking benefits player development.25 Second, the US subcommittee cited concerns about player safety, noting a threefold increase in game-related injuries, “including concussion, severe injury and severe concussion,” among players aged 11–12 years following the introduction of bodychecking.8,29

The increased incidence of serious injuries related to bodychecking has also been observed in other countries where bodychecking is not permitted for younger players.7,28 In Finland, Mölsä and coauthors observed a disproportionate increase in injuries related to bodychecking, compared with other mechanisms of injury, in the age group for which bodychecking is first introduced.7 Additionally, bodychecking was found to be the dominant mechanism of injury in older groups.7

The way forward

Rates of concussion in hockey are among the highest in all contact sports.4,30 There is considerable evidence to support the conclusion that to substantially reduce the number of concussions and subconcussion impacts in junior hockey would require a comprehensive set of changes to how minor hockey is played, including the elimination of bodychecking.5–9,21,24,28 The recommendation of the Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine to eliminate bodychecking in all levels of minor hockey except elite leagues, and then only for players aged 16 and older, is a reasonable compromise that acknowledges the need for specialized training for a select few at the elite level of play.24 Hockey has a combination of aggressive play, high speed and hard playing surfaces that makes it especially risky for athletes of all ages, and hockey, like most sports, cannot be made 100% concussion-free. For that reason, better training in detection of concussions and heightened vigilance on the part of coaches, physicians, trainers and parents of hockey players is essential. Also, adherence to return-to-play protocols will always be needed, so that players who do suffer concussions receive proper management and don’t return to the ice before they’re ready.

More than a decade ago, the NHL led the way in professional sports by adopting postconcussion return-to-play protocols and mandating baseline neuropsychologic testing for its athletes.31 The league recently implemented a new protocol for detection of concussions, requiring that players with suspected concussions be examined by a physician for 15 minutes in a quiet office location.32

Now, the NHL needs to do more to prevent concussions. But even if nothing changes in professional hockey, more can and should be done to protect junior hockey players. If youth hockey players are not exposed to bodychecking, their chances of experiencing a concussion will decrease considerably. Because the damaging effects of concussion are cumulative, the fewer concussions a youth player has sustained, the better off they’ll be in the short and long term. Only 1 in 4000 youth hockey players makes it to the professional league,33 but taking measures to limit subconcussion impacts and hits that induce concussion at the junior level, where young athletes often play for more than a decade, means NHL players will have accumulated fewer damaging blows to the head over the entire course of their hockey-playing lives.

Bodychecking in minor hockey introduces substantial risks of serious injury, including the risk of concussion and lasting brain damage. Those risks do not come with comparably important benefits for the 99.9% of junior hockey players who do not need to develop the skills requisite for playing professional hockey.24,33 There is ample evidence to support the conclusion that bodychecking should be banned from all levels of minor hockey,5–7,21,28 except leagues where elite players are trained.24 Research to determine the optimal age to introduce bodychecking, as well as the best practices for teaching bodychecking at elite levels to minimize injury, would be a valuable and needed contribution to the literature on safety in hockey.

The way hockey is played by the professionals is imitated in junior hockey. This creates a vicious cycle in which young athletes learn to play in a way that inevitably causes injury5,21 and in turn influence the next generation of players. It’s time to break that cycle and teach youths to play in a way that emphasizes skill and protects their brains, so they’ll be prepared to do the same when they grow up. There are a lot of kids who want to be the next Sidney Crosby, but they ought to be able to play the sport they love without being the next hockey player with a concussion.

    Key points

  • Concussion is a common, serious injury in youth ice hockey, affecting up to 25% of players per season by one estimate.

  • Bodychecking is a major cause of injury and concussion in hockey, yet some Canadian provinces allow players as young as nine years to engage in bodychecking.

  • Reducing rates of concussion requires eliminating bodychecking for all except elite hockey players aged 16 years and older, as per the recommendations of the Canadian Academy of Sports and Exercise Medicine.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks anonymous reviewers who provided valuable and informative feedback on this paper.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article has been peer reviewed.

  • Funding: Research funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research, MOP 77670, Therapeutic Hopes and Ethical Concerns: Clinical research in the neurosciences, and NNF 80045, States of Mind: Emerging issues in neuroethics.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gulli C
    . The damage done. Maclean’s 2011 Feb. 4: 50–4.
  2. ↵
    1. Rosen D
    . How can a concussed player get back on the ice? NHL.com; 2010 Mar. 12. Available: www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=545327#&navid=nhl-search (accessed 2011 Mar. 21).
  3. ↵
    Associated Press. NHL concussions on rise, accidental hits blamed. NHL.com; 2011 Jan. 29. Available: www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=551016 (accessed 2011 Apr. 4).
  4. ↵
    1. Goodman D,
    2. Gaetz M,
    3. Meichenbaum D
    . Concussions in hockey: There is cause for concern. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001;33:2004–9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Macpherson A,
    2. Rothman L,
    3. Howard A
    . Body-checking rules and childhood injuries in ice hockey. Pediatrics 2006;117:e143–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Hagel BE,
    2. Marko J,
    3. Dryden D,
    4. et al
    . Effect of bodychecking on injury rates among minor ice hockey players. CMAJ 2006; 175:155–60.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Mölsä J,
    2. Kujala U,
    3. Myllynen P,
    4. et al
    . Injuries to the upper extremity in ice hockey: analysis of a series of 760 injuries. Am J Sports Med 2003;31:751–7.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Emery CA,
    2. Kang J,
    3. Shrier I,
    4. et al
    . Risk of injury associated with body checking among youth ice hockey players. JAMA 2010; 303:2265–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Echlin PS,
    2. Tator CH,
    3. Cusimano MD,
    4. et al
    . A prospective study of physician-observed concussion during junior ice hockey: implications for incidence rates. Neurosurg Focus 2010;29:E4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Williamson IJS,
    2. Goodman D
    . Converging evidence for the under-reporting of concussion in youth ice hockey. Br J Sports Med 2006;40:128–32.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Hicks B
    . Hard times ahead for national sport. CBC.ca; 2009 Jan. 12. Available: www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/ourgame/story/2009/01/05/registration-part1.html (accessed 2011 Mar. 21).
  12. ↵
    1. Grady MF
    . Concussion in the adolescent athlete. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2010;40:154–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Purcell L,
    2. Carson J
    . Sport-related concussion in pediatric athletes. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2008;47:106–13.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Moser RS,
    2. Schatz P,
    3. Jordan BD
    . Prolonged effects of concussion in high school athletes. Neurosurgery 2005;57:300–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. McCrory P,
    2. Collie A,
    3. Anderson V,
    4. et al
    . Can we manage sport related concussion in children the same as in adults? Br J Sports Med 2004;38:516–9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Boutin D,
    2. Lassonde M,
    3. Robert M,
    4. et al
    . Neurophysiological assessment prior to and following sports-related concussion during childhood: a case study. Neurocase 2008;14:239–48.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bey T,
    2. Ostick B
    . Second impact syndrome. West J Emerg Med 2009;10:6–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Collins MW,
    2. Lovell MR,
    3. Iverson GL,
    4. et al
    . Cumulative effects of concussion in high school athletes. Neurosurgery 2002;51: 1175–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. McKee AC,
    2. Cantu RC,
    3. Nowinski CJ,
    4. et al
    . Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy following repetitive head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2009;68:709–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy — Boston University. 18 year old high school football player. Boston (MA): The Center; 2009. Available: www.bu.edu/cste/case-studies/18-year-old/ (accessed 2011 Feb. 8).
  19. ↵
    1. Cusimano MD,
    2. Taback NA,
    3. McFaull SR,
    4. et al
    . Effect of body-checking on rate of injuries among minor hockey players. Open Med 2011;5:E57–64.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Marchie A,
    2. Cusimano MD
    . Bodychecking and concussion in ice hockey: Should our youth pay the price? CMAJ 2003;169:124–8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Safety in youth ice hockey: the effects of body checking. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Pediatrics 2000;105:657–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Kissick J
    . Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine Position Statement: violence and injuries in ice hockey. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Academy of Sport and Exercise Medicine; 2007. Available: http://casem-acmse.org/pg_Statements.php (accessed 2011 Feb. 14).
  23. ↵
    Background on checking. HockeyCanada.ca; 2011. Available: www.hockeycanada.ca/index.php/ci_id/6862/la_id/1/ss_id/6887.htm (accessed 2011 Mar. 21).
  24. ↵
    1. Rutherford K
    . Quebec hockey bucking the trend: initiation hockey is surging while other provinces struggle to maintain current numbers. CBC.ca; 2009 Jan. 20. Available: www.cbc.ca/sports/hockey/ourgame/story/2009/01/12/registration-quebec.html (accessed 2011 Mar. 21).
  25. ↵
    1. Pearsall DJ,
    2. Ashare AB
    1. Montelpare WJ,
    2. McPherson MN
    . Measuring the effects of initiating body checking at the Atom age level. In: Pearsall DJ, Ashare AB, editors. Safety in ice hockey: fourth volume, ASTM STP 1446. West Conshocken (PA): ASTM International; 2004. p. 70–84.
  26. ↵
    1. Warsh JM,
    2. Constantin SA,
    3. Howard A,
    4. et al
    . A systematic review of the association between body checking and injury in youth ice hockey. Clin J Sport Med 2009;19:134–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hockey USA
    . Bodychecking rule proposal. USA Hockey Available: www.usahockey.com//Template_Usahockey.aspx?NAV=ET_03&ID=299508 (accessed 2011 Mar. 22).
  28. ↵
    1. Koh JO,
    2. Cassidy JD,
    3. Watkinson EJ
    . Incidence of concussion in contact sports: a systematic review of the evidence. Brain Inj 2003; 17:901–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Lovell MR
    . The relevance of neuropsychological testing for sports-related head injuries. Curr Sports Med Rep 2002;1:7–11.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Rosen D
    . New concussion protocol goes into effect tonight. NHL.com; 2011 Mar. 16. Available: www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=556289#&navid=nhl-search (accessed 2011 Mar. 21).
  31. ↵
    1. Kalchman L
    . Making NHL a very long shot. HockeyCanada.ca; 2003 Jan. 25. Available: www.hockeycanada.com/index.php/ci_id/10767/la_id/1/ (accessed 2011 Feb. 14).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 8
17 May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Concussion in youth ice hockey: It’s time to break the cycle
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Concussion in youth ice hockey: It’s time to break the cycle
L. Syd M. Johnson
CMAJ May 2011, 183 (8) 921-924; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110282

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Concussion in youth ice hockey: It’s time to break the cycle
L. Syd M. Johnson
CMAJ May 2011, 183 (8) 921-924; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110282
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Concussion in youth ice hockey
    • The role of bodychecking
    • The way forward
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • “Sport” and “non-sport” concussions
  • A prospective study of concussions among National Hockey League players during regular season games: the NHL-NHLPA Concussion Program
  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Concussion in youth hockey
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Gaslighting in academic medicine: where anti-Black racism lives
  • Assessing the need for Black mentorship within residency training in Canada
  • Ensuring equitable access to cancer care for Black patients in Canada
Show more Analysis

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Adolescent medicine
    • Neurology
    • Pediatrics
    • Sports & exercise medicine

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire