Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review

Carl van Walraven, Carol Bennett, Alison Jennings, Peter C. Austin and Alan J. Forster
CMAJ April 19, 2011 183 (7) E391-E402; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101860
Carl van Walraven
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: carlv@ohri.ca
Carol Bennett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison Jennings
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Austin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan J. Forster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Readmissions to hospital are increasingly being used as an indicator of quality of care. However, this approach is valid only when we know what proportion of readmissions are avoidable. We conducted a systematic review of studies that measured the proportion of readmissions deemed avoidable. We examined how such readmissions were measured and estimated their prevalence.

Methods We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify all studies published from 1966 to July 2010 that reviewed hospital readmissions and that specified how many were classified as avoidable.

Results Our search strategy identified 34 studies. Three of the studies used combinations of administrative diagnostic codes to determine whether readmissions were avoidable. Criteria used in the remaining studies were subjective. Most of the studies were conducted at single teaching hospitals, did not consider information from the community or treating physicians, and used only one reviewer to decide whether readmissions were avoidable. The median proportion of readmissions deemed avoidable was 27.1% but varied from 5% to 79%. Three study-level factors (teaching status of hospital, whether all diagnoses or only some were considered, and length of follow-up) were significantly associated with the proportion of admissions deemed to be avoidable and explained some, but not all, of the heterogeneity between the studies.

Interpretation All but three of the studies used subjective criteria to determine whether readmissions were avoidable. Study methods had notable deficits and varied extensively, as did the proportion of readmissions deemed avoidable. The true proportion of hospital readmissions that are potentially avoidable remains unclear.

See related commentary by Goldfield at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.110448

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (7)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 7
19 Apr 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • CMAJ 100th Anniversary Tributes

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review
Carl van Walraven, Carol Bennett, Alison Jennings, Peter C. Austin, Alan J. Forster
CMAJ Apr 2011, 183 (7) E391-E402; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.101860

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Proportion of hospital readmissions deemed avoidable: a systematic review
Carl van Walraven, Carol Bennett, Alison Jennings, Peter C. Austin, Alan J. Forster
CMAJ Apr 2011, 183 (7) E391-E402; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.101860
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Identification of factors associated with high-cost use of inpatient care in chronic kidney disease: a registry study
  • Strategies to Reduce Rehospitalization in Patients with CKD and Kidney Failure
  • Development of a risk prediction model of potentially avoidable readmission for patients hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia: study protocol and population
  • Study of potentially preventable hospitalisations (PPH) for chronic conditions: what proportion are preventable and what factors are associated with preventable PPH?
  • Can we predict early 7-day readmissions using a standard 30-day hospital readmission risk prediction model?
  • SAFety, Effectiveness of care and Resource use among Australian Hospitals (SAFER Hospitals): a protocol for a population-wide cohort study of outcomes of hospital care
  • Improving transitions from acute care to home among complex older adults using the LACE Index and care coordination
  • Bedscales: A non-contact adherence-independent multi-person sensor for longitudinal physiologic monitoring in the home bed
  • Stroke readmissions: Playing defense?
  • Predicting risk of unplanned hospital readmission in survivors of critical illness: a population-level cohort study
  • Patient experiences using a novel tool to improve care transitions in patients with heart failure: a qualitative analysis
  • Reducing readmission rates through a discharge follow-up service
  • Timely Outpatient Follow-up Is Associated with Fewer Hospital Readmissions among Patients with Behavioral Health Conditions
  • What is the impact on the readmission ratio of taking into account readmissions to other hospitals? A cross-sectional study
  • Analysis and Prediction of Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Readmission using Recurrent Neural Networks with Long Short-Term Memory
  • Patient vs provider perspectives of 30-day hospital readmissions
  • Unplanned early hospital readmission among critical care survivors: a mixed methods study of patients and carers
  • Partners at Care Transitions: exploring healthcare professionals perspectives of excellence at care transitions for older people
  • Thirty-day hospital readmission and emergency department visits after vascular surgery: a Canadian prospective cohort study
  • ModelHeart: a resident-led implementation of metrics to reduce 30-day heart failure readmissions
  • Protocol for a mixed methods study of hospital readmissions: sensemaking in Veterans Health Administration healthcare system in the USA
  • Effectiveness of a financial incentive to physicians for timely follow-up after hospital discharge: a population-based time series analysis
  • Simplification of the HOSPITAL score for predicting 30-day readmissions
  • A local quality initiative to improve follow-up times for patients with heart failure
  • Team-based versus traditional primary care models and short-term outcomes after hospital discharge
  • Visit Entropy Associated with Hospital Readmission Rates
  • Association of 30-Day Readmission Metric for Heart Failure Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program With Quality of Care and Outcomes
  • No Exit: Identifying Avoidable Terminal Oncology Intensive Care Unit Hospitalizations
  • Do Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure Readmissions Flagged as Potentially Preventable by the 3M Potentially Preventable Readmissions Software Have More Process-of-Care Problems?
  • Worlds Apart: The Hype and Reality of Big Data to Improve Health Care
  • Influence of Sacubitril/Valsartan (LCZ696) on 30-Day Readmission After Heart Failure Hospitalization
  • Person-centred pharmaceutical care reduces emergency readmissions
  • National characteristics and predictors of neurologic 30-day readmissions
  • ReCAP: Insights Into the Potential Preventability of Oncology Readmissions
  • Preoperative prediction of potentially preventable morbidity after fast-track hip and knee arthroplasty: a detailed descriptive cohort study
  • Identifying preventable readmissions: an achievable goal or waiting for Godot?
  • Do pneumonia readmissions flagged as potentially preventable by the 3M PPR software have more process of care problems? A cross-sectional observational study
  • Association of Rehabilitation Intensity for Stroke and Risk of Hospital Readmission
  • Diagnosing Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations (DaPPHne): protocol for a mixed-methods data-linkage study
  • An Examination of Physician-, Caregiver-, and Disease-Related Factors Associated With Readmission From a Pediatric Hospital Medicine Service
  • Physician experience and outcomes among patients admitted to general internal medicine teaching wards
  • Association between frailty and 30-day outcomes after discharge from hospital
  • Facility-Level Variation in Hospitalization, Mortality, and Costs in the 30 Days After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights on Short-Term Healthcare Value From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking System (VA CART) Program
  • Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program
  • Classifying emergency 30-day readmissions in England using routine hospital data 2004-2010: what is the scope for reduction?
  • Pneumonia Readmissions: Risk Factors and Implications
  • Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study
  • Characterizing Types of Readmission After Acute Coronary Syndrome Hospitalization: Implications for Quality Reporting
  • Transitional Care Interventions Prevent Hospital Readmissions For Adults With Chronic Illnesses
  • Safely and effectively reducing inpatient length of stay: a controlled study of the General Internal Medicine Care Transformation Initiative
  • Site of hospital readmission and mortality: a population-based retrospective cohort study
  • Identification of Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations in Patients With GI Cancer
  • Do Cardiology Quality Measures Actually Improve Patient Outcomes?
  • Decreasing readmissions: it can be done but one size does not fit all
  • Preventable Readmissions Within 30 Days of Ischemic Stroke Among Medicare Beneficiaries
  • Home care: more than just a visiting nurse
  • Defining quality outcomes for complex-care patients transitioning across the continuum using a structured panel process
  • Strategies for Reducing Potentially Avoidable Hospitalizations for Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions
  • Limits Of Readmission Rates In Measuring Hospital Quality Suggest The Need For Added Metrics
  • Home-care nurses' perceptions of unmet information needs and communication difficulties of older patients in the immediate post-hospital discharge period
  • Transitional interventions to reduce early psychiatric readmissions in adults: systematic review
  • Patient-Identified Factors Related to Heart Failure Readmissions
  • Development of a predictive model to identify inpatients at risk of re-admission within 30 days of discharge (PARR-30)
  • There Must Be a Better Way: Piloting Alternate Routes Around Heart Failure Hospitalizations
  • Causes and patterns of readmissions in patients with common comorbidities: retrospective cohort study
  • Changes in Heart Failure Outcomes After a Province-Wide Change in Health Service Provision A Natural Experiment in Alberta, Canada
  • Improving patient outcomes with better care transitions: The role for home health
  • Trends and predictors of rehospitalisation following an acute coronary syndrome: report from the Australian and New Zealand population of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE)
  • Contemporary Evidence About Hospital Strategies for Reducing 30-Day Readmissions: A National Study
  • Rehospitalization for Heart Failure: Predict or Prevent?
  • The Three-Phase Terrain of Heart Failure Readmissions
  • Not All Readmissions Are Created Equal
  • How important is it to identify avoidable hospital readmissions with certainty?
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital factors associated with maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries to patients with a previous cesarean delivery: an ecological study
  • Booster vaccination with inactivated whole-virus or mRNA vaccines and COVID-19–related deaths among people with multimorbidity: a cohort study
  • Association between virtual primary care and emergency department use during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire