Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Better home care and better pay for doctors urged at CMA town hall

Paul Christopher Webster
CMAJ April 05, 2011 183 (6) E319-E320; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3831
Paul Christopher Webster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Even on a cold winter night, it seems Canadians can’t resist the promise of an earnest evening of debate over medicare reform: With 500 people in the room and another 150 turned away on Mar. 1 in Toronto, Ontario, at the Canadian Medical Association’s second town hall meeting on health care transformation, it’s evident that a passion for public health persists in Canada’s biggest city.

In a two-hour session structured to allow ample commentary from a crowd heavily stocked with health professionals, CMA President Dr. Jeff Turnbull and a panel including Ontario Medical Association President Dr. Mark MacLeod contended with a barrage of calls for sweeping reforms to sizeable portions of Canada’s universal access health care system.

The aim of the exercise, according to Turnbull, was to get “everyone around the table” and encourage a little public dialogue — but no ranting, please — on central issues such as the role of the federal government in health care, and how the Canada Health Act might be refashioned.

Both issues elicited forceful discussion (and just a few rants) about the need to expand public health to include pharmacare and homecare, and the need to shift the current focus from acute care toward chronic care.

Secondary themes included the need to develop greater transparency and accountability in health care, and the need to invest in electronic information technologies.

“Too many seniors are slipping through the cracks. They inevitably wind up in emergency wards,” warned Toronto physician Dr. Mark Nowaczynski. “Why isn’t home health care in the Canada Health Act?”

A major reason patients are not treated in their homes, Nowaczynski explained, is that under current pay schemes, care providers wind up receiving around 40% less pay for the extra time and effort required to get out of their offices and into patients’ homes.

Figure

Payment models for doctors providing home care was among the most topical issues raised at the Canadian Medical Association’s second town hall meeting on health care transformation.

Image courtesy of © 2011 Jupiterimages Corp.

“We need to make a business case for doing home care,” Nowaczynski urged. “It’s just too hard to sell interns and doctors on a pay cut.”

MacLeod concurred, noting that up to 20% of Ontario hospital beds “are occupied by people who could be treated at home or in other institutions.” In order to encourage doctors to treat people at home, governments will have to reform payment models, he argued.

The home care quandary, many participants noted, reflects demographic patterns in which increasing numbers of aging patients now require escalating levels of costly care.

“The system has not changed but the population has,” suggested Dr. Samir Sinha, director of geriatrics at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto.

Meanwhile, there are only about 200 geriatricians practising in Canada, about one-quarter the statistically appropriate number, Sinha said. Here again, pay structures serve as disincentives for physicians working with the elderly, he complained.

But anxieties over the costs of caring for an aging population — described as “eating us alive” by panelist Andrew Coyne, national editor of Maclean’s — may be overstated, argued Derek Chadwick, a board member of the Ontario Health Coalition.

Chadwick suggested that various analyses indicate that care for the elderly will prove less costly than predicted. The real fiscal menace is the cost of drugs, he said, adding that a publicly managed and funded pharmacare system “would, in fact, save a lot of money.”

Canadian Doctors for Medicare Chair and Toronto family physician Dr. Danielle Martin also argued that a single payer pharmacare system would achieve cost control over rapidly increasing pharmaceutical costs in Canada. “If there is any one Pac-Man eating up health care budgets, it’s pharma,” she quipped. “From a purely economic perspective, we need pharmacare.”

Among the four panelists, only Durhane Wong-Reiger, president of the Institute for Optimizing Health Outcomes, spoke in support of pharmacare. She cast the lack of public pharmacare, which leaves many patients unable to afford medicines provided for free when they are in hospital, as a “gaping hole” in the system.

But Mary Jo Haddad, president and CEO of Toronto’s Hospital for Sick Children argued that a national pharmacare plan shouldn’t be on the table. “We can’t afford to add and add” to medicare.

MacLeod said efficiencies in the current system should be pursued before adding new elements. “If we are going to add things we are going to have to be fully informed about their costs.”

More starkly, Coyne argued that national pharmacare would create “an open-ended financial obligation” at a time when Canada’s “unfunded liabilities” for social programs are already as high as $1.8-trillion.

Coyne added that as much 30% of current health care costs could be slashed through “efficiency gain,” but did not specify areas. MacLeod noted that there are benefits to be found through greater investments in electronic health information technologies.

That drew strong support from Barrie, Ont. anesthesiologist Dr. Doug Crawford, who complained that, while federal and provincial governments have spent billions on misdirected electronic health information investments, “they haven’t asked us what we want.”

The town hall meetings are part of a broad public consultation that CMA launched in 2010 to spark an “adult conversation” on updating and expanding the Canada Health Act (www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-3333). At the first meeting in Halifax, Nova Scotia, delegates focused on systemic problems such as lengthy wait times, “gross inequities” in access to treatment and waste within the system (www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.109-3797). The conversation will continue with town halls in Edmonton, Alberta and Vancouver, British Columbia before wrapping up with one in Ottawa, Ontario.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 6
5 Apr 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Better home care and better pay for doctors urged at CMA town hall
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Better home care and better pay for doctors urged at CMA town hall
Paul Christopher Webster
CMAJ Apr 2011, 183 (6) E319-E320; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3831

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Better home care and better pay for doctors urged at CMA town hall
Paul Christopher Webster
CMAJ Apr 2011, 183 (6) E319-E320; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3831
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Providing abortions to Americans could land Canadian doctors in legal trouble — without CMPA assistance
  • Troubling rise in suicides linked with common food preservative
  • Weak SARS-CoV-2 vaccine booster campaign resurrects specter of health care hesistancy
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health care coverage
    • Health policy

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire