Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors

Christopher O. Phillips
CMAJ April 05, 2011 183 (6) E309-E311; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110366
Christopher O. Phillips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chr_phi@yahoo.com
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with ACE inhibitors - June 14, 2011

See related research article by McAlister and colleagues at www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.101333.

In this issue, McAlister and colleagues looked at the safety of combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (combination therapy) using a retrospective cohort study.1 The authors employed a central laboratory repository with linked administrative data to assess adverse drug effects.1 They found that of the 1750 patients (5.4% of the study population) who received combination therapy, 86.4% did not have trial-established indications such as heart failure or proteinuria. Combination therapy, compared with ACE inhibitors alone, was associated with significant increases in renal dysfunction and hyperkalemia (serum potassium levels ≥ 6.0 mmol/L). Moreover, combination therapy was poorly tolerated, and 88.1% of patients who stopped it were given monotherapy instead.

Despite the limitations associated with analysing administrative data sets, McAlister and colleagues appropriately defined exposure and outcome variables, assessed temporal relationships and accounted for potential major confounding factors.1 The strength of their observational study is its consistency with the adverse drug effects reported in clinical trials.

Activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system is a major neurohormonal driver of adverse cardiovascular and renal remodeling.2 This results in significant increases in morbidity and mortality among patients with heart failure, chronic kidney disease and left ventricular dysfunction in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.2 Treatment with ACE inhibitors is recommended based on several decades of scientific evidence that show significant reductions in morbidity and mortality, as well as the reversal of many of the deleterious effects of activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system.3–5 However, subsequent increases in angiotensin-II levels (angiotensin-II reactivation) during prolonged treatment with ACE inhibitors (prevalence estimates of 18%–45% have been reported) may blunt the long-term efficacy of ACE inhibitors.6

Combination therapy may provide opportunities for adjunctive blockade of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system and a viable clinical alternative for certain patients.7–11 The Randomized Evaluation of Strategies for Left Ventricular Dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study compared the efficacy of combining candesartan (an angiotensin-receptor blocker) and enalapril (an ACE inhibitor) with monotherapy among patients with chronic heart failure (n = 768, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 27% and 48 weeks of follow-up).7 The authors reported that there were no significant differences in mortality or morbidity and stated that larger trials were needed to assess the effects of combination therapy on major clinical outcomes.7

Several large clinical trials have been subsequently published affirming that combination therapy significantly reduces morbidity, but not mortality.8–11 These benefits have been observed among patients with chronic heart failure,8,9 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction10 and patients with chronic kidney disease.11,12

The magnitude of benefit has been summarized in several systematic reviews.11,12 Kuenzli et al. performed a systematic review using all available studies of combination therapy versus monotherapy in heart failure with or without acute mycardial infarction and found significant incremental reductions in admissions to hospital (relative risk [RR] 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72–0.91]).13 In addition, the Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global End-point Trial, targeting patients with renal dysfunction, showed modest incremental renovascular protection with combination therapy versus monotherapy (RR 1.09 [95%CI, 1.01–1.18]).11

Using the scientific evidence available, the Heart Failure Society of America has given combination therapy a class 1A recommendation. The Society states that the addition of an angiotensin-receptor blocker should be considered for patients with heart failure due to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who have persistent symptoms, or a progressive worsening of symptoms, despite therapy with an ACE inhibitor and a β-blocker.4 Consensus recommendations for the use of combination therapy in other clinical settings are evolving, and clinical enthusiasm appears to be growing.3–5

Emerging concerns about the tolerability of, and the adverse drug events associated with, combination therapy may limit its prescription to certain patients.13–15 A meta-analysis of pooled data from four of the largest clinical trials to study patients given combination therapy versus a control group given background treatment with an ACE inhibitor initially showed significant increases in the proportions of patients stopping treatment due to adverse drug events (11% v. 15%, p < 0.001; number needed to treat [NNT] 25), worsening renal function (1.5% v. 2.4%, p < 0.001; NNT 111), hyperkalemia (0.8% v. 1.6%, p < 0.001: NNT 125) and symptomatic hypotension (2.4% v. 4.1%, p < 0.001; NNT 59).14 These findings have been confirmed in recently published reports.13,14

When should physicians prescribe combination therapy, to whom should it be given, and when should patients stop receiving it? First, prescribing decisions concerning combination therapy should be driven by clinical guidelines and knowledge of the potential risks of adverse drug effects. Second, the available evidence supports combination therapy for patients with symptomatic left venticular dysfunction (despite optimal therapy with an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker) and patients with proteinuria. Third, careful clinical monitoring coupled with identification of alternative causes of progressive renal dysfunction and hyperkalmeia may provide more objective determinants for withdrawal from combination therapy.

The study by McAlister and colleagues also showed that most of the patients who stopped taking combination therapy had relatively minor changes in their glomerular filtration rate and serum potassium levels.1 This was despite the authors’ projected estimates of a 0.52% monthly risk of adverse renal outcomes.1 Data from four of the largest clinical trials to study combination therapy have shown that this strategy can be sustained for long periods when prescribed to eligible patients.13–15 Therefore, a decline in renal function may not have been the primary reason for patients to stop taking their medications.

Persistent concerns among physicians about symptomatic hypotension and severe or life-threatening hyperkalemia affecting patients given combination therapy may be barriers to this regimen being prescribed clinically. Better risk–benefit assessments that include patient eligibility, appropriate clinical indications, tests for baseline renal function and determination of angiotensin-II levels during prolonged treatment with ACE inhibitors may improve patient selection. Knowledge of adverse drug effects and closer monitoring could reassure prescribing clinicians that combination therapy remains a viable option for certain patients.

    Key points

  • Combining angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors with angiotensin-receptor blockers should be considered for patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who have persistent or progressive worsening of symptoms despite treatment with an ACE inhibitor and a β-blocker.

  • McAlister and colleagues suggest that 5.4% of patients prescribed combination therapy do not have clear indications such as proteinuria or heart failure.

  • Patients who receive combination therapy are more likely than patients who receive monotherapy to stop taking their medications because of adverse drug effects; these effects do not include overt renal dysfunction or hyperkalemia.

  • Better risk-to-benefit assessment, appropriate patient selection and close clinical monitoring may preserve the long-term viability of combination therapy.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • This article was solicited and has not been peer reviewed.

References

  1. ↵
    1. McAlister FA,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Tonelli M,
    4. et al
    . The safety of combining angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors with angiotensin-receptor blockers in elderly patients: a population-based longitudinal analysis. CMAJ 2011;183:655–62.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Gibbons GH,
    2. Dzau VJ
    . The emerging concept of vascular remodeling. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1431–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hunt SA,
    2. Abraham WT,
    3. Chin MH,
    4. et al
    . 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Circulation 2009;119:e391–479.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Lindenfeld J,
    2. Albert NM,
    3. Boehmer JP,
    4. et al
    Heart Failure Society of America, Lindenfeld J, Albert NM, Boehmer JP, et al. HFSA 2010 comprehensive heart failure practice guideline. J Card Fail 2010;16:e1–194.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. O’Hare AM,
    2. Kaufman JS,
    3. Covinsky KE,
    4. et al
    . Current guidelines for using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II–receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease: Is the evidence base relevant to older adults? Ann Intern Med 2009;150:717–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Athyros VG,
    2. Mikhailidis DP,
    3. Kakafika AI,
    4. et al
    . Angiotensin II reactivation and aldosterone escape phenomena in renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system blockade: is oral renin inhibition the solution? Review on ang-II reactivation. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2007;8:529–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. McKelvie RS,
    2. Yusuf S,
    3. Pericak D,
    4. et al
    . Comparison of candesartan, enalapril, and their combination in congestive heart failure: randomized evaluation of strategies for left ventricular dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. The RESOLVD Pilot Study Investigators. Circulation 1999;100:1056–64.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Cohn JN,
    2. Tognoni G
    . Valsartan Heart Failure Trial Investigators. A randomized trial of the angiotensin-receptor blocker valsartan in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1667–75.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. McMurray JJ,
    2. Ostergren J,
    3. Swedberg K,
    4. et al
    .; CHARM Investigators and Committees. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-added trial. Lancet 2003;362:767–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Pfeffer MA,
    2. McMurray JJV,
    3. Velasquez EJ
    .; VALIANT Investigators. Valsartan, captopril or both in myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure, left ventricular dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1893–906.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Mann JFE,
    2. Schmeider RE,
    3. McQueen M
    .; ONTARGET Investigators. Renal outcomes with telmisartan, ramipril or both, in people at high vascular risk (the ONTARGET Study): a multi-centre, randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372:547–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    The ONTARGET Investigators. Telmisartan, ramipril or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 2008;358: 1547–59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Kuenzli A,
    2. Bucher HC,
    3. Anand I,
    4. et al
    . Meta-analysis of combined therapy with angiotensin receptor antagonists versus ACE Inhibitors alone in patients with heart failure. PLoS ONE 2010; 5:e9946.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Phillips CO,
    2. Kashani A,
    3. Ko DT,
    4. et al
    . Adverse effects of combination angiotensin II receptor blockers plus angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for left ventricular dysfunction. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:1930–6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lakhdar R,
    2. Al-Mallah MH,
    3. Lanfear DE
    . Safety and tolerability of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Card Fail 2008;14:181–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 6
5 Apr 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors
Christopher O. Phillips
CMAJ Apr 2011, 183 (6) E309-E311; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110366

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors
Christopher O. Phillips
CMAJ Apr 2011, 183 (6) E309-E311; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110366
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with ACE inhibitors
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Combining angiotensin-receptor blockers with ACE inhibitors
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Transforming race-based health research in Canada
  • Not neutral: reimagining antiracism as a professional competence
  • Time to dismantle systemic anti-Black racism in medicine in Canada
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Drugs: polypharmacy
    • Drugs: cardiovascular system
    • Drugs: adverse reactions

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire