Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

The forces behind mood disorders

Normand Carrey
CMAJ March 22, 2011 183 (5) 590; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091660
Normand Carrey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Mania: A Short History of Bipolar Disorder. David Healy. Johns Hopkins Biographies of Disease; 2009.

Psychiatry has a PR problem. It seems that every week or so, an article or a book comes out revealing how yet another top academic has accepted drug company money, creating the impression in the public’s mind that all psychiatrists are on the payroll. For more than two decades, Dr. David Healy, a professor of psychiatry, has been telling us what is wrong with psychiatry and in the process taking a lot of heat. His books include Let Them Eat Prozac, The Antidepressant Era, and The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Healy argues that academia’s role has changed radically as a beacon of sober analysis in the face of frivolous claims and trends, as research and clinical care is increasingly dominated by pharmaceutical interests and market-driven imperatives.

Mania looks at historical and contemporaneous forces shaping the construction of mood disorders in general, the bipolar brand and the controversial issue of pediatric bipolar disorder. It traces the presentation of serious mood problems across different eras and shows how physicians have historically struggled with similar clinical challenges, recalibrated periodically to technical and professional changes. Even when manic–depressive illness was finally recognized as a type of insanity category in its own right (circular insanity or folie circulaire) in 1854, the condition remained relatively rare in asylums. And the belief that manic depression or bipolar disorder was relatively uncommon remained current up until the early 1960s.

The strongest claim to a continuity between today’s construct of bipolar disorder and earlier classification systems is a link to the turn-of-the-century system proposed by German psychiatrist Emil Kraepelin. A cornerstone of his approach was dividing the major psychoses into those with a progressive deteriorating course and the less disabling intermittent disorders such as manic–depressive illness.

Figure1
Image courtesy of Johns Hopkins Biographies of Disease

This distinction would later set the stage for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM), the hugely popular “bible” of biological psychiatry that has come to dominate classification internationally since the 1980s. Healy explains that “While the ideal type of a manic–depressive patient now seems compelling, it did not seem obvious through the lens of early 20th century clinicians.” Classification systems in psychiatry, rather than being accurate facsimiles of “carving nature at the joints,” reflect in part the idiosyncrasies of their makers, as much then as nowadays.

Why should anyone care about sterile academic debates about dead psychiatrists and ancient nomenclature? If the results were inconsequential then it would not matter. Across time, psychiatrists have invented concepts, whether they were biological treatments or systems of psychotherapy, and defended them rigidly as the only viable truths. This is our imperfect human nature. However with blockbuster drugs garnering billions in revenues for their companies, Healy demonstrates how, over the last 30 to 40 years, commercial interests have come to dominate all aspects of psychiatric practice in journals and conferences under the guise of addressing the mushrooming prevalence rates of DSM-based psychiatric disorders.

Manic–depressive illness, Kraepelin’s own term and with a very precise meaning, was supplanted with bipolar disorder, a concept that lends itself better to diagnostic elasticity as it can include the mood fluctuations of personality disorders; then it was just a short step away to the bipolar teen, the bipolar child and finally the bipolar toddler.

In a doctor’s mind there is a very tight association between diagnosis and treatment. If a mood is perturbed then it makes sense to use a “mood stabilizer.” Or does it? Healy shows that by using branding, companies promote the marketing of certain drugs as necessary “mood stabilizers” creating an aura of specificity, coupled with the need to prevent future hypothetical episodes of illness. Anxious parents and professionals alike are made to feel remiss if they question this withholding of apparently “necessary” treatment. Imperceptibly the older mood stablilizers such as lithium and sodium valproate have been replaced with the improved brand, the atypical antipsychotics, which nonetheless have their own serious side effects.

This book is an excellent exposé of the history of bipolar disorder, but its brevity precludes a more comprehensive treatment of the history of psychopharmacology, a book written by the same author.1 Healy demonstrates that a rigorous analysis of the history of psychiatry is critical to its integration as a science and a humanistically based clinical practice. Forget all the chatter out there about this author: Read him!

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Healy D
    . The creation of psychopharmacology. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 2002.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 5
22 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The forces behind mood disorders
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The forces behind mood disorders
Normand Carrey
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (5) 590; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091660

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
The forces behind mood disorders
Normand Carrey
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (5) 590; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091660
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The butterfly
  • Are we going to talk about it?
  • Grief on the phone
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire