Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

“Obamacare” snagged in legal thicket

Cal Woodward
CMAJ March 08, 2011 183 (4) E233; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3803
Cal Woodward
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

When officials in more than half the states filed suit against President Barack Obama’s landmark health care law, many shrugged it off as a desperate, frivolous attempt by Republicans to achieve in the courts what they failed to do in the United States Congress: block the reforms.

Now, that legal challenge is proving far more potent than simply a case of sour grapes.

Obama’s big domestic achievement is almost certainly headed for a showdown in the Supreme Court, an ideologically split body with a narrow conservative majority, following a lower court’s decision in Florida declaring the law unconstitutional.

Emboldened by gains in the November 2010 elections, Republicans pressed forward with an effort to repeal the reforms through legislative action. That effort collapsed Feb. 2, when the Senate’s Democratic majority defeated a repeal initiative that had passed in the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

It’s a different story in the courts.

At its core, Obama’s overhaul seeks to expand health insurance to nearly all Americans through a web of subsidies, controls on the private insurance industry and a federal mandate that people obtain coverage.

It’s that mandate that plunged the law into constitutional hot water. “Never before,” US District Judge Roger Vinson said in his Jan. 31 ruling, “has Congress required that everyone buy a product from a private company (essentially for life) just for being alive and residing in the United States” (www.flnd.uscourts.gov/announcements/documents/10cv91doc150.pdf).

Vinson’s ruling in Florida was the most consequential of four that have emerged and the second to have gone against what has euphemistically come to be known as “Obamacare.” It certainly reached the farthest, declaring that the entire law should be tossed because the mandate, which is central to everything else in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, is unconstitutional.

Figure1

“Those who seek to undermine this source of congressional authority would turn back the clock to the hardships of the Great Depression,” says Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont.

Image courtesy of Reuters/Jason Reed

Even so, Vinson kept the law in effect pending appeals and it could take more than a year for the case to filter up to the Supreme Court. Meantime, big health-care players signaled they will proceed with all requirements. States that joined the suit are among those setting up new insurance markets. Each passing month entrenches the new order more deeply and raises questions about whether it all can really be reset.

At the heart of the challenge is the Constitution’s commerce clause, which lets Washington regulate economic activity crossing state lines, and which has been used broadly to exert federal authority over states’ rights.

The government argues that a citizen who refuses to buy health insurance, but seeks treatment at the expense of hospital or taxpayers, affects commerce and therefore can be regulated under federal law.

“Those who seek to undermine this source of congressional authority would turn back the clock to the hardships of the Great Depression, striking down principles that have been settled for nearly three-quarters of a century and standing the Constitution on its head,” says Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Leahy earlier told the Senate that, in opting out of health insurance, “free riders do not opt out of the health care market. Rather, they shift the cost of their decision on to people who do have health insurance.”

But Michael Carvin, a constitutional attorney, says “sitting at home and staying out of the commercial marketplace is not commerce” and therefore, the government has no business making anyone in that situation buy anything. “If that is proper, then there’s literally nothing that Congress can’t do.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 4
8 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“Obamacare” snagged in legal thicket
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
“Obamacare” snagged in legal thicket
Cal Woodward
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (4) E233; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3803

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
“Obamacare” snagged in legal thicket
Cal Woodward
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (4) E233; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3803
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Canada’s long road to a vaccine injury compensation program
  • Health advocates want help handling online harassment
  • Time for more effective masks?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire