Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Salon

Patients are harmed (again), fingers point. What’s wrong?

W. Ward Flemons and Jan M. Davies
CMAJ March 08, 2011 183 (4) 520; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.101389
W. Ward Flemons
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan M. Davies
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A patient is misdiagnosed with breast cancer and undergoes needless surgery. The public is informed only after it happens again; confidence is shaken. Additional concerns about pathology services arise and an external review is completed. The report names one surgeon and one pathologist, numerous issues are highlighted, including an unhealthy organizational culture, and several fixes are recommended.1

Will care be safer? This is not a trivial question, nor are these cases isolated events. Similar cases across the country have come to light in recent years — why does this keep happening?

There are no simple answers. Health care is intensely complex and the safety issues that need to be addressed for the core functions of care — keeping people healthy, making people better, managing chronic disease and end-of-life care — are all very different. For example, pathologists require cognitive expertise or being good thinkers, in contrast to emergency physicians, who also require “procedural expertise.”2

Health care will never be made substantially safer by focusing after the fact on individual providers. Furthermore, naming, blaming and shaming individuals for doing things we are all capable of, never makes a system safer — and may have the opposite effect. Health care organizations that try to restore public confidence by punishing individuals suffer from the “vulnerable system syndrome.”3 The syndrome is characterized by three elements: blaming frontline individuals, denying the potential for catastrophes, and mistakenly pursuing the “wrong type of excellence” with a focus on production and finance performance targets.3

This is not to say that post-event performance evaluation is not important in some cases. However, the sweet spot for safer patient care lies in the continual evaluation and improvement of processes used to deliver care, as well as structural elements of the system that support care delivery, for example, environment and equipment factors.

Governments, leaders of health care organizations, health care providers and educators would be well served by (re)reading the National Steering Committee on Patient Safety 2002 report. One of its principles for action was “to develop, maintain and nurture a culture of safety.”4 This phrase refers to four specific but interdependent components. The “safety culture” of an organization requires a “reporting culture,”5 where workers submit reports reactively about close calls and events leading to harm, as well as proactively about hazards and hazardous situations. Such reporting only takes place within a “just culture,” characterized by an atmosphere of trust, in which people are encouraged, even rewarded, for providing essential safety-related information. However, organization must also draw the line “between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour.” There should be sanctions for individuals who intentionally harm patients or who are recklessly noncompliant with accepted standards.

Figure1
Image courtesy of ©2011 Jupiterimages Corp.

An organization that is both “just” and “reporting” will be better able to use information garnered both internally and externally and so become a “learning organization.” Organizations must also be able to draw the right conclusions and have the will to implement major reforms. One such reform involves developing the ability to shift power during crises from the top of the bureaucracy to “task experts on the spot.” Organizations that have evolved in this way have developed a “flexible culture.”5

Taken together, these four attributes — reporting, just, learning and flexible — characterize an “informed organization.”5 And as the currency of safety for any organization is its safety-critical information, an organization rich in information (gathered appropriately, learned from, and applied) is said to have a safety culture.

To make care safer, those individuals charged with funding and governing health care systems in Canada must demonstrate informed, principle-based, consistent leadership. Redeployment of resources for improving safety is also badly needed, so that care can be improved in a systematic way across the entire health system. Finally, an investment in the will to do so, rather than continued complaints about the lack of safe care, should benefit patients who will be spared harm, and also the system intent on helping them. Safer patients are cheaper patients.

References

  1. ↵
    Report of the Investigators of Surgical and Pathology Issues at Three Essex County Hospitals: Hôtel-Dieu Grace Hospital, Leamington District Memorial Hospital and Windsor Regional Hospital. The Investigators of Surgical and Pathology Issues at Three Essex County Hospitals; 2010.
  2. ↵
    1. Croskerry P
    . The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7:1223–31.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Reason JT,
    2. Carthey J,
    3. de Leval MR
    . Diagnosing “vulnerable system syndrome”: an essential prerequisite to effective risk management. Qual Health Care 2001;10:ii21–5.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    National Steering Committee on Patient Safety. Building a safer system. A national integrated strategy for improving patient safety in Canadian health care. Ottawa (ON): The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2002.
  5. ↵
    1. Reason J
    . Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot (UK): Ashgate Publishing Company; 1997.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 4
8 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients are harmed (again), fingers point. What’s wrong?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients are harmed (again), fingers point. What’s wrong?
W. Ward Flemons, Jan M. Davies
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (4) 520; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.101389

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Patients are harmed (again), fingers point. What’s wrong?
W. Ward Flemons, Jan M. Davies
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (4) 520; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.101389
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
  • Revisiting Rodriguez
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement
    • Drugs: adverse reactions

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire