Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letter

Canadian faculties of medicine not in denial

Nick Busing
CMAJ March 08, 2011 183 (4) 463; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111-2020
Nick Busing
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In their Sept. 7, 2010 editorial, Hébert and colleagues touch on a critical subject: the complicated relationship between industry and medical education.1 The authors rightly point out that in many medical schools, “future generations of students are [being] taught by some expert faculty who receive funds from the pharmaceutical industry.” They go on to say that “it is time for medical faculties and academic physicians to stop burying their heads in the sand.”

Far from burying their hands in the sand, the Board of Directors of the Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC), which comprises all 17 deans of medicine and 4 public members, voted to endorse the principles contained in the Association of American Medical Colleges report on industry funding of medical education that the authors reference.2 There can be no clearer signal that the senior leadership of our faculties of medicine is taking action. All of our faculties have reviewed their codes and guidelines relating to conflict of interest and many have made, or are making, substantial advances.

Three important issues must be acknowledged. First, despite the fact that the authors focus exclusively on the pharmaceutical industry, concerns about conflict of interest apply to medical device companies, biotech firms and many other private-sector industries.

Second, AFMC agrees that “medical students deserve a bias-free education.” But bias and conflict of interest are not the same thing. Conflicts of interest do not inherently lead to bias, and bias can certainly exist without conflicts of interest.

Third, guidelines, policies and procedural frameworks must be developed in all settings and contexts in which medical students and faculty function. Conflicts of interest must be addressed collectively by our faculties, affiliated hospitals and research institutes, practice settings, home universities, associations such as the CMA, specialty societies and industry.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hébert PC,
    2. MacDonald N,
    3. Flegel K,
    4. et al
    . Competing interests and undergraduate medical education: time for transparency. CMAJ 2010;182:1279.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Industry funding of medical education: report of an AAMC task force. Washington (DC): Association of American Medical Colleges; 2008. Available: http://services.aamc.org/publications/showfile.cfm?file=version114.pdf&prd_id=232 (accessed 2011 Feb. 9).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 4
8 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Canadian faculties of medicine not in denial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Canadian faculties of medicine not in denial
Nick Busing
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (4) 463; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111-2020

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Canadian faculties of medicine not in denial
Nick Busing
CMAJ Mar 2011, 183 (4) 463; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111-2020
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Editor’s response
  • Oral contraceptives and risk of gallbladder disease
  • Oral contraceptives and risk of gallbladder disease
Show more Letter

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire