Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Experts call for national immunization registry, coordinated schedules

Laura Eggertson
CMAJ February 22, 2011 183 (3) E143-E144; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3778
Laura Eggertson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Canadian Public Health Association and leading pediatricians and immunologists are calling for a national immunization registry and harmonized vaccination schedules so no one risks missing a vaccine because of where they live.

Both the registry — which would likely consist of a network of linked provincial databases — and harmonized schedules should be part of a renewed national immunization strategy, says Dr. Ian Gemmill, the medical officer of health for Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Public Health in Ontario. Gemmill is one of more than 50 “stakeholders” in public health who are calling for a strengthened national immunization strategy, which would include the registry and coordinated immunization schedules.

Deputy ministers of health across Canada originally approved a national immunization strategy that was funded through a $45-million contribution over five years in the 2003 federal budget. A national immunization trust subsequently provided $300 million to help the provinces make four additional vaccines — acellular pertussis, meningo-coccal C conjugate, pneumococcal conjugate and varicella — available. But many argued that overall progress was limited (www.cmaj.ca/cgi/doi/10.1503/cmaj.070686).

It’s now clear that while access for some vaccines (such as the human papillomavirus vaccine) and vaccine procurement has improved, for some components of the strategy, “it’s like the engine got stalled,” Gemmill says.

For example, Canada Health Infoway was charged, in the wake of the SARS crisis, with developing a single public health information system for Canada, which would include a national vaccination registry. But the system, called Panorama, has not yet been rolled out in any Canadian jurisdiction.

“It’s behind schedule and over budget, but it is a potential solution that would allow provinces and territories to run an interconnected network,” says Dr. Monika Naus, medical director of immunization programs for the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control.

Figure

Provinces and territories administer specific vaccines at different ages, so people who move risk missing immunizations.

Image courtesy of © 2011 Jupiterimages Corp.

The physicians are concerned that because there is no national registry, neither health care providers nor patients can track immunization records when people move from one jurisdiction to another.

Ideally, both physicians and patients should be able to access records through a cradle-to-grave electronic database. That would allow them to determine what vaccines were missed, which ones require boosters and what new vaccines are available.

“It’s a question of equity and transportability,” says Dr. Bob Bortolussi, chair of Canadian Paediatric Society’s infectious disease and immunization committee and a pediatrician at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia.

In addition, because provinces and territories administer specific vaccines at different ages, people who move risk missing immunizations. For example, someone born in Nova Scotia who moves to BC at age five would likely miss his hepatitis B vaccination because BC administers it early and Nova Scotia administers it to school-age children.

Registries would also provide better surveillance information, so Canada could evaluate and assess its immunization programs to see what proportion of the population is actually protected against particular diseases, says Naus. “We know that in some countries where vaccination levels have slipped, there have been epidemics or outbreaks of these diseases.”

Monitoring uptake on immunizations could also allow public health officials to target education campaigns at regions in which antivaccination advocates have been active, Gemmill says. “If we’re not there to provide the information that people need, and to answer their questions truthfully, then the only source of information those people have is the antivaccination people.”

Advocates of a registry and a strengthened strategy say that Canada must overcome barriers to its introduction, including the inability of some jurisdictions to mesh their electronic vaccination databases with those of other provinces or territories.

Another barrier includes the need for revisions in the privacy legislation of some provinces and territories to ensure that vaccination data can be collected and securely held in accessible registries.

The establishment of national standards and schedules within a Canadian Immunization Registries Network is another obstacle.

There is a lack of federal leadership on such issues, say Gemmill and Bortolussi.

“The first and most important (barrier) is political will and money,” says Gemmill. “The people who have to fund it need to be convinced. Maybe we in public health need to do a better job of selling the value of registries.”

Bortolussi points to Australia as a model of federal leadership. Its central government purchases vaccines for distribution by the states, implements a vaccination schedule and provides funds for states and territories to obtain vaccines listed on the National Immunisation Program. The states then decides whether they want to do so.

“They take [the money], because I think everyone can see there’s a benefit to the vaccine,” says Bortolussi. “It’s for the public good, and having a systematic synchronized immunization program is of benefit to everyone.”

By contrast, the Public Health Agency of Canada has a National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI), which reviews the merits of every new vaccine, recommends the age at which it should be administered and conducts a cost–benefit analysis. But unlike Australia’s federal government, the Canadian government does not offer the provinces and territories 100% funding for vaccinations, so the provinces and territorites must essentially choose what they want, and can afford, to administer.

Canada lacks the federal leadership required to ensure the advisory committee’s recommendations are adopted consistently and that the money exists across the country to pay for them, Bortolussi says. “They need to put some money behind it, so the NACI recommendations can be implemented and take effect.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (3)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 3
22 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experts call for national immunization registry, coordinated schedules
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Experts call for national immunization registry, coordinated schedules
Laura Eggertson
CMAJ Feb 2011, 183 (3) E143-E144; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3778

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Experts call for national immunization registry, coordinated schedules
Laura Eggertson
CMAJ Feb 2011, 183 (3) E143-E144; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3778
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Se preparer a la prochaine pandemie en creant la << Societe canadienne de limmunisation >>
  • Preparing for the next pandemic by creating Canadian Immunization Services
  • The challenge of vaccinating adults: attitudes and beliefs of the Canadian public and healthcare providers
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire