Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
Holiday Reading

Tabulating Ingestion of Mocha Solution (TIMS): a longitudinal prospective cohort study

Gregory Staios, Waqas U. Khan, Lina Chiuccariello, Laurie H. Sellings, Kim De Sousa, Shan Wang, Steven Lo and Alexander K. Elkader
CMAJ December 13, 2011 183 (18) 2149-2150; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111648
Gregory Staios
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Waqas U. Khan
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lina Chiuccariello
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laurie H. Sellings
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kim De Sousa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shan Wang
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven Lo
MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander K. Elkader
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The annual “Roll Up the Rim to Win” contest at Tim Hortons restaurants provides customers the opportunity to win prizes. This study investigated win ratios, prize types and patterns of coffee consumption.

Tim Hortons, better known as “Timmy’s” to true Canadians, is Canada’s largest fast-food chain and is best known for introducing the term “double-double” into the Canadian Oxford Dictionary. For the past 25 years, between the months of February and May, Canadians have been given the opportunity to “Roll Up the Rim to Win” (RUTRTW). These rollable rims may reveal prizes ranging from a vehicle to a donut (exchangeable for a muffin, for those who did not realize).

According to the Canadian Association for Sanitation Science, discarded rim-rolled Tim Hortons cups are prevalent in all regions of the country, suggesting widespread rolling behaviour. In most instances, this rolling behaviour is benign. However, case studies of excessive rim-rolling have reported conditions such as coffee drinker’s thumb, burnt tongue syndrome and the more recently characterized Timmy’s insomnia. Though serious and warranting further research, these conditions are beyond the scope of this paper.

Despite the high prevalence of this rolling behaviour, no peer-reviewed publications exist to our knowledge that examine win ratios or characteristics of coffee consumption associated with the RUTRTW contest. This study aims to compare published and observed win rates and describe patterns of coffee consumption before and during this contest period.

Methods

This was a multiyear, prospective study conducted during the RUTRTW periods in 2008, 2010 and 2011. Additionally in 2011, information was collected for eight weeks before the beginning of RUTRTW. This information was collected to conduct a comparison of consumption patterns during the pre-RUTRTW and RUTRTW periods.

All cups were purchased by graduate students during their allocated six hours of unstructured socialization time per day. During the data collection periods from 2008 to 2011, participants were required to report date and location of purchase, size of cup and win status (win/lose and prize) to the Tabulating Ingestion of Mocha Solution (TIMS) study coordinator electronically. Home brews were not reported. Participants were not provided reimbursement or compensation for participating in the trial.

Figure
Image courtesy of Jonathan Lin

Although we attempted to obtain research ethics board approval, to our dismay, we were informed that this study “was not a real trial” and therefore did not require review.

Results

Cup characteristics

A total of 987 cups were included in the study, with 279 collected during the pre-RUTRTW period in 2011, leaving 708 cups for the primary analysis. Of these cups, 153 (21.6%), 245 (34.6%) and 310 (43.8%) were from the 2008, 2010 and 2011 RUTRTW periods, respectively. However, of the 310 cups collected in 2011, 33 were purchased from other coffee vendors, leaving 277 cups from the 2011 RUTRTW period. This information was collected to assess choice of coffee establishment during RUTRTW. Of the cups reported, 97.6% were purchased in the Greater Toronto Area. Within the total sample, percentages of medium, large and extra-large cups purchased during the three-year period were 61.0%, 35.7% and 3.3%, respectively.

Observed win ratios

A total of 24 cups (15.7%), 26 cups (10.6%) and 42 cups (15.2%) were reported as winners during the 2008, 2010 and 2011 RUTRTW periods, respectively. Moreover, the win ratios were 1:6.4 for 2008, 1:9.4 for 2010 and 1:6.6 for 2011. Tim Hortons’ win-ratio data were not available for 2008; however, the values obtained in this study were in accordance with Tim Hortons’ advertised win ratios of 1:9 in 2010 and 1:6 in 2011.

Prize type and size among winning cups

Over the course of the entire study period, 77.4% of prizes won were coffees and 22.6% were donuts. There were no significant differences in prize type across years. Although no nonedible prizes were won by study participants, an author’s friend’s sister won a bicycle during the 2011 RUTRTW period.

In 2008, wins were most common in large-sized cups (71%), whereas in 2010 and 2011, wins were most common in medium-sized cups (54% and 67%, respectively). However, no relation between cup size and likelihood of winning was seen when all winning cups were analyzed independently of year.

Choice of coffee establishment and cup sizes purchased before and during RUTRTW

During the pre-RUTRTW period, 81.0% of all coffees were purchased at Tim Hortons, whereas during the RUTRTW period, 89.4% were purchased at Tim Hortons (p < 0.001). A significant shift in cup size purchased between these periods was also observed. During the pre-RUTRTW period, the percentage of large or greater cups purchased was 11.9% (88.1% medium, 11.9% large and 0.0% extra large). In comparison, during the RUTRTW period, 33.9% of all cups purchased were either large or extra large (66.1% medium, 30.7% large and 3.2% extra large) (p < 0.001).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to fully characterize win characteristics and patterns of coffee consumption associated with the annual Tim Hortons RUTRTW contest.

In this study, we found that the win ratios observed during the contest were consistent with those reported by Tim Hortons. The results also show that there is no greater likelihood of winning a prize by purchasing larger cups during the RUTRTW period, further confirming the age old adage that size truly does not matter.

Interestingly, during the 2011 RUTRTW period, we observed a shift in purchasing behaviour toward larger cup sizes. This may be indicative of a cognitive distortion regarding win probability across cup sizes during the RUTRTW period, similar to that observed in problem gamblers.1 Widespread dissemination of this finding may have important clinical implications. Specifically, a reduction in caffeine consumption may decrease the harms associated with excessive intake, such as insomnia, nervousness,2 TDJ (Thesis Defence Jitters) and a spectrum of supervisor-induced anxiety disorders.

This study also determined that the RUTRTW contest is effective at increasing the percentage of coffees purchased by participants at Tim Hortons relative to other coffee establishments. This model of reinforcement could potentially be translated to modify other consumption-related behaviours, for instance, to revitalize the consumption of locally grown fresh fruits and vegetables. This could be accomplished through the development of transgenic fruits and vegetables that include a message in the produce itself. Rather than rolling up the rim, Canadians could choose to “Pop the Pod,” “Crack the Carrot” or, better yet, “Split the Banana” and win healthy prizes, such as gift certificates for fresh produce.

Despite these highly impressive results, there was one limitation to the current study. It was conducted almost exclusively in a graduate student population and, therefore, may not be generalizable to other populations. This may be because graduate students consume coffee at a rate that would be lethal in any other population, perhaps with the exception of medical residents. Using this population allowed for the timely acquisition of data, as a much larger group of participants would be needed if this study were conducted in the general population. Nonetheless, further research in more diverse participant populations is warranted. The authors recommend the creation of the Canadian Institute for tim Hortons Research (CItHR) to provide necessary funding opportunities in this new and emerging field, with 10% of the funds allocated to feeding the authors of the present study and starving graduate students nationwide.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

  • Funding: The study was funded solely from graduate student stipends (equivalent to 32.4% of their yearly income). The authors did not receive any financial compensation from Tim Hortons or any other source for this study.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Joukhador J,
    2. Maccallum F,
    3. Blaszczynski A
    . Differences in cognitive distortions between problem and social gamblers. Psychol Rep 2003;92:1203–14.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Health Canada reminds Canadians to manage caffeine consumption [information update]. Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; 2010.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (18)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 18
13 Dec 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tabulating Ingestion of Mocha Solution (TIMS): a longitudinal prospective cohort study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tabulating Ingestion of Mocha Solution (TIMS): a longitudinal prospective cohort study
Gregory Staios, Waqas U. Khan, Lina Chiuccariello, Laurie H. Sellings, Kim De Sousa, Shan Wang, Steven Lo, Alexander K. Elkader
CMAJ Dec 2011, 183 (18) 2149-2150; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111648

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Tabulating Ingestion of Mocha Solution (TIMS): a longitudinal prospective cohort study
Gregory Staios, Waqas U. Khan, Lina Chiuccariello, Laurie H. Sellings, Kim De Sousa, Shan Wang, Steven Lo, Alexander K. Elkader
CMAJ Dec 2011, 183 (18) 2149-2150; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111648
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Pareidolia and clinical reasoning: the pattern awakens
  • On the road from Bethany
  • LimitationsAn experiment in open peer review
Show more Holiday Reading

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire