Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Mandatory vaccinations: The Canadian picture

Erin Walkinshaw
CMAJ November 08, 2011 183 (16) E1165-E1166; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3992
Erin Walkinshaw
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As might be expected in Canada, vaccination policies are as diverse as the geogra-high immunization rates by educating their populations about the benefits of vaccines. Just three have legislated vaccination policies, applying strictly to children about to enrol in school. Ontario and New Brunswick require immunization for diphtheria, tetanus, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella immunization, while Manitoba requires a measles vaccination.

In each case, though, the legislation includes an exemption clause. Essentially, each of the three provinces allows parents to request that their child be exempted from the vaccination requirement on medical or religious grounds, or simply out of conscience. In such instances, in the event of a disease outbreak, unvaccinated children can be excluded from entering a school.

“The exclusion of nonimmunized individuals from entry during an outbreak situation is to protect the public and to contain the outbreak as quickly as possible,” Andrew Morrison, spokesperson for the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, writes in an email.

New Brunswick takes a similar approach and it’s “unlikely” that the province would ever “enforce mandatory vaccination for the population in general,” Danielle Phillips, spokesperson for the province’s Department of Health, writes in an email. “That being said, during something like a pandemic event, people who are not immunized might have to be excluded from certain social/ work environments where causing risk to others would be unacceptable.”

Phillips adds that if actions ever had to be taken against individuals, they would probably be in the form of isolation, quarantine or directly observed treatment.

For the most part, vaccination compliance rates appear high in most provinces.

Figure

In Ontario, Manitoba and New Brunswick, unvaccinated children can be excluded from entering a school in the event of a disease outbreak.

Image courtesy of © 2011 Thinkstock

In New Brunswick, for example, 93.6% of children entered kindergarten in the 2008–09 school year with the required vaccinations, Phillips writes.

In Ontario, “the vast majority of school pupils comply with the requirement to report their immunization status to attend school in the province,” Morrison writes. In the 2009–2010 school year, 84%–92% of students aged 7 to 17 had been vaccinated. “That means 8%–16% of school-aged children either did not report to local health units the appropriate number of required immunizations or have exemption on file,” he adds.

Theoretically, noncompliance can result in hefty penalties. In Ontario, failure to vaccinate children can result in a fine of up to $1000 (www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90i01_e.htm).

Other provinces, such as Alberta, which do not have any form of legislation governing vaccinations, nevertheless retain the authority to preclude students from attending school in the event of a disease outbreak. “Immunization in Alberta is voluntary; therefore no student is denied entrance into a school facility based on their immunization status. However, if there is a case or outbreak of measles in school setting, a child would be excluded from school until two weeks after the last case occurred if he/she is not immunized against measles,” the Alberta Ministry of Health writes in an email.

The ministry added that “Alberta has not considered making school immunization mandatory since the immunization rates achieved to date are over 90% by the time a student leaves grade one.”

Vaccination skeptics say there’s no need for provinces to move with stricter policies.

In the case of outbreaks, parents should be allowed to determine whether they “are willing to take the risk that their children get that disease, get through it and develop long-term, lifelong immunity,” says Edda West, coordinator coordinator of Vaccination Risk Awareness Network (Canada), a not-for-profit educational group. “The parents of the vaccinated children believe their children are totally protected from that disease, so what is the problem? Who is being protected?”

West adds that if vaccination advocates “believe the vaccine works and they’re really effective, then the unvaccinated child should pose no problems to anybody.”

Advocates counter that the extent to which a vaccine is effective within a population is based on both coverage (the number of people vaccinated), and efficacy of the vaccine within those individuals, which varies.

Vaccine effectiveness, in terms of percentage, ranges from the low seventies and eighties for influenza or pertussis, to the nineties for measles and up to 100% for human papilloma virus and hepatitis B, says Dr. Ian Gemmill, former chair of the Canadian Coalition of Immunization Awareness and Promotion.

Vaccination policies for health care workers appear equally languorous across the nation. Most provinces do not have legislation in the area, although, in Alberta, all health care workers who deal with infants, prenatal women or in postpartum settings must be protected against rubella. As well, “some private long term care facilities in Alberta have instituted mandatory influenza immunization in the event of an influenza outbreak in that facility,” the Ministry of Health and Wellness writes in an email.

Ontario has no plans to proceed with legislation, although the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care “is strongly supportive of statements by the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) which highly recommends that health care workers be immunized,” Morrison writes. “In many instances, individual work place policies require health care workers to be immunized against specific diseases as a condition of employment at the facility or institution.”

The federal government doesn’t appear inclined to step into the fray, noting that vaccination policies, and enforcement therein, fall within provincial jurisdiction.

“The Public Health Agency of Canada supports immunization as an effective means to protect Canadians from infectious diseases, and encourages all Canadians to keep their immunizations up-to-date,” Charlene Wiles, media relations advisor for the agency, writes in an email.

Editor’s note: First of a three-part series on mandatory vaccination

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 16
8 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mandatory vaccinations: The Canadian picture
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Mandatory vaccinations: The Canadian picture
Erin Walkinshaw
CMAJ Nov 2011, 183 (16) E1165-E1166; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3992

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Mandatory vaccinations: The Canadian picture
Erin Walkinshaw
CMAJ Nov 2011, 183 (16) E1165-E1166; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3992
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Parental attitudes towards mandatory vaccination; a systematic review
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Resignations at Canada’s drug pricing panel raise independence questions
  • Provinces accept federal health funding deal
  • Feds propose $196B health funding deal with few strings attached
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire