Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Clinical Shorts

Diane Kelsall
CMAJ November 08, 2011 183 (16) 1883; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111711
Diane Kelsall
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Tailored treatment of back pain

Stratifying management of back pain in adults according to prognosis results in improved disability scores compared with standard care — and is less expensive. This is the conclusion of a randomized trial involving 851 adults with back pain, with or without radiculopathy, who were referred from 10 general practices in England. Participants were assigned to receive usual care (assessment by a physiotherapist and further treatment, if required) or the intervention, which consisted of a simple screening questionnaire that stratified patients into risk groups (low, medium and high) based on prognosis and a treatment program targeted to the patient’s level of risk.

At four months’ follow up, overall mean changes in a validated disability score were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (4.7 [standard deviation 5.9] v. 3.0 [5.9]), with a between-group difference of 1.81 (95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.57). Significant improvements in disability were also noted at 12 months, and in secondary outcome measures that included physical and emotional functioning, quality of life, intensity of pain and days off work. Cost savings were greater in the intervention group. See Lancet 2011; doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60937-9.

Rate of progression of disease in COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) results in an accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), but this decline is faster in patients who continue to smoke, have emphysema or have bronchodilator reversibility, say the authors of a three-year observational study. The 2163 participants in the study received usual care for their COPD, managed by their usual physicians.

The mean rate of change in FEV1 was 33±2 mL per year, with substantial variation in the levels of change. More than one in three participants (38%) had an estimated rate of decline of more than 40 mL per year, but in some participants (8%), FEV 1 actually increased by more than 20 mL per year. The rate of decline was not affected by age, cumulative tobacco exposure or number of previous exacerbations. Exacerbations during follow up had a small effect on the rate of decline. Because patients who continued to smoke were at increased risk for progression of their disease compared with former smokers, the authors stress that smoking cessation is the most important tool in secondary and tertiary prevention for patients at all stages of COPD. See N Engl J Med 2011;365:1184-92.

Evaluation of lymph nodes in cancer of the colon

Although the number of lymph nodes evaluated during surgery for cancer of the colon has increased over the past 20 years, this practice has not been associated with a shift toward diagnosis of higher-stage cancers. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 1998 to 2008, the authors of this study looked at the relationship between evaluation of lymph nodes and node positivity in 86 394 adults surgically treated for cancer of the colon.

During 1988–1990, 34.6% of patients had 12 or more lymph nodes evaluated, compared with 73.6% during 2006–2008 (p < 0.001); however, the proportion of node-positive cancers was similar (40% v. 42%). Although patients with high numbers of lymph nodes evaluated were slightly more likely to be node-positive, paradoxically they had significant reduction in mortality hazard at five years compared with those who had fewer nodes evaluated (adjusted hazard ratio for 30–39 nodes v. 1–8 nodes, 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.71.) Hence, the increased survival seen in cancer of the colon is probably not due to more accurate staging; rather, it may be a result of other factors, such as improved surgical quality or postsurgical care. The authors caution that initiatives to improve quality aimed at increasing evaluation of lymph nodes for cancer of the colon may have a limited effect on improving survival. See JAMA 2011; 306:1089-97.

Is immune globulin beneficial in treating neonatal sepsis?

No, it isn’t. Although newborns are relatively deficient in endogenous immunoglobulin, treatment with intravenous immune globulin has no effect on rates of death or disability at two years in neonates with sepsis. In a multicentre randomized trial, 3493 infants receiving antibiotics for suspected or proven serious infection were randomized to receive two infusions of polyvalent IgG immune globulin or placebo 48 hours apart. The rest of the management plan was left to the patient’s attending physician.

The rate of death or major disability at two years was the same (39%) in both the treatment (686/1759) and placebo (677/1734) groups. There were also no significant differences in other adverse outcomes, such as chronic lung disease, major cerebral abnormality or number of subsequent episodes of sepsis. The authors conclude that there was no evidence of benefit or harm with use of immune globulin, even when results were adjusted according to risk factors for severity of disease, including preterm birth. See N Engl J Med 2011; 365:1201-11.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (16)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 16
8 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Shorts
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Clinical Shorts
Diane Kelsall
CMAJ Nov 2011, 183 (16) 1883; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111711

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Clinical Shorts
Diane Kelsall
CMAJ Nov 2011, 183 (16) 1883; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.111711
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Tailored treatment of back pain
    • Rate of progression of disease in COPD
    • Evaluation of lymph nodes in cancer of the colon
    • Is immune globulin beneficial in treating neonatal sepsis?
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A blistering variant of phlegmasia cerulea dolens from underlying squamous cell lung cancer
  • Parechovirus infections in infants
  • Radiation dermatitis in a patient treated for hepatocarcinoma
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire