Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

An operatic version of the Banting story

Ian Cameron
CMAJ October 04, 2011 183 (14) E1092; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.110091
Ian Cameron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Breakthrough: Elizabeth Hughes, the Discovery of Insulin, and the Making of a Medical Miracle. Thea Cooper, Arthur Ainsberg. St. Martin’s Press; 2010

Breakthrough is about the discovery of vital medical knowledge: insulin. Most CMAJ readers will know the Banting, Best, Collip, MacLeod dysfunctional drive to isolate insulin culminating in 1922 with a product that would save the lives of countless diabetics.1 Many will have read Michael Bliss’ authoritative works, The Discovery of Insulin and Banting: A Biography. In fact, these are the texts that Breakthrough’s authors “read and reread” and “were instrumental in navigating the chronological frame work for [their] narrative.”

So, given all that’s been written already, why do you need to read this book? Simply because it is compelling high opera, with a star cast and it has meticulous references. Sure the authors indulge in artistic license, but that helps the journey. Maybe Dr. Frederick Banting didn’t bury the engagement ring in his front lawn and maybe Charles Evans Hughes, US secretary of state, didn’t phone the president of the University of Toronto, but both events are in keeping with the character of the unpredictable Banting and the integrity of the husband/ father conflicted statesman Hughes.

When I began reading Breakthrough and learned that “some cases have been invented or augmented for narrative purposes” I began thinking with flagrant academic snobbery and righteous Canadian chauvinism, that I would do much better rereading the real story in Bliss’ books. Then I came to Elizabeth Hughes’ mother’s midnight raid on the physiatric institute to rescue her daughter and take her to Banting wherein “she bounded from the car and hurried up the broad alabaster steps.” Well, I had a visceral reaction. I don’t mind a little melodrama, but no one in their right mind would make front steps out of alabaster, a semiprecious pure white gypsum with a hardness of two (2/10). Then I suspended my left brain. The steps weren’t alabaster they looked like alabaster with its sepulchre connotation and inside the institute was Elizabeth Hughes starving to death with diabetes, all skin and bones. To her mother, Elizabeth would be a precious, fragile, alabaster daughter.

Figure1
Image courtesy of St. Martin’s Press

So I’ve come to think about this book and similar creative nonfiction endeavours not so much as taking liberties with facts, as forcing the reader to think differently and perhaps get closer to the emotional truth of a situation. This is what reflective narrative, such as the articles under the Encounters banner in this journal, is all about. The authors of Breakthrough document their history very carefully and they tell you up front that they are going to tinker to improve the narrative and it works. It also allows them to make the book much richer.

The book consists of four interwoven substories and each chapter ends with just enough suspense to enliven the narrative. There is Hughes, the perky adolescent from a high-profile political US family who is dying of diabetes. She is being treated by the humourless Dr. Frederick Allen who keeps his patients alive by starving them. Then there is the penniless, driven, combative Banting who, against all odds, discovers the cure. Finally there is the medical researcher Dr. Alec Clowes who goes to the dark side and joins Eli Lilly the pharmaceutical firm who has the resources to manufacture insulin in the quantity and quality to save those who are about to die. Ethicists will not be disappointed.

There are mysteries. Once successfully treated, why did Hughes, who died in 1981, make no attempt to help other diabetics? Who was the mysterious Dr. McClintock? And would Banting have made more discoveries if the Canadian government hadn’t given him an annuity?

It is refreshing to see medical history through the eyes of a playwright and financial officer. Due diligence and leadership issues lurk and I liked the artistic writing touches, “listening together to the percussive pendulum of the grandfather clock that stood like a stoic sentry” gave me a clearer sense of a family’s silent suffering as they awaited impending doom. I also realized the importance of visual diversions and wonderment as Elizabeth, too weak to move, lay in the Bermuda sun watching “aerial brigantines.”

You will really enjoy reading Breakthrough and your horizons will be expanded by a story that really matters.

Reference

  1. ↵
    1. Banting FG,
    2. Best CH,
    3. Collip JB,
    4. et al
    . Pancreatic extracts in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Can Med Assoc J 1922;12:141–6.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (14)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 14
4 Oct 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
An operatic version of the Banting story
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
An operatic version of the Banting story
Ian Cameron
CMAJ Oct 2011, 183 (14) E1092; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110091

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
An operatic version of the Banting story
Ian Cameron
CMAJ Oct 2011, 183 (14) E1092; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.110091
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Reference
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The butterfly
  • Are we going to talk about it?
  • Grief on the phone
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire