Article Figures & Tables
Figures
- Figure 1:
Flow chart for 7746 patients with acute myocardial infarction in the Enhanced Feedback for Effective Cardiac Treatment study and the 4403 patients included in the current study, after application of exclusion criteria. The final number of patients in the analyses includes 75 patients who bypassed the emergency department and went straight to the cardiac catheterization laboratory, the cardiac care unit or the hospital ward.
- Figure 2:
Adjusted odds, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of a delayed presentation (more than six hours from onset of chest pain) in men with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). *For every decade increase in age. Note: CABG = coronary artery bypass graft, OR = odds ratio, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Figure 3:
Adjusted odds, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of a delayed presentation (more than six hours from onset of chest pain) in women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). *For every decade increase in age. Note: CABG = coronary artery bypass graft, OR = odds ratio, PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
Tables
- Table 1:
Baseline characteristics of the study cohort of 4403 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), by duration of time between onset of chest pain and presentation to the emergency department
- Table 2:
Adjusted odds of delayed presentation to the emergency department (i.e., presentation more than six hours after onset of chest pain) among 4403 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI)
- Table 3:
Quantile regression analyses for 3967 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who had time recorded from onset of chest pain to presentation at emergency department
In this issue
Article tools
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.