Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

End-of-life planning framework calls for fewer checklists

Lauren Vogel
CMAJ January 11, 2011 183 (1) 33; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3746
Lauren Vogel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A national framework for advance care planning would see Canada’s “tick-box” approach to preparing for the worst incorporated into a more formal process of ongoing communication and reflection between patients, their families and health care providers.

The framework, now in development by the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association (CHPCA), aims to shift the focus of advance care planning from patients making lists of the medical interventions they’d like to receive or refuse to a more flexible conversation about their values and the goals of care.

“Two years ago, people thought simply filling out a form was adequate advance care planning. Get the patient’s wishes down on paper and you’re good to go,” says Louise Hanvey, project leader of the team developing the framework.

It’s never been easier for Canadians to give instructions about the kind of care they’d want to receive but the extent to which those are followed, or are even useful, is limited, Hanvey says, largely because of a lack of awareness, training and infrastructure to support the communication required for effective advance care planning.

“We developed the forms to create these documents and the provinces got the legal supports in place to recognize them, but we didn’t develop the public education, professional engagement or system supports to use them effectively,” Hanvey explains.

According to a draft of the framework, effective advance care planning requires a number of conversations over time so that patients can articulate and clarify their wishes. Those should occur in a nonstressful environment and patients should craft written directions in consultation with their health care team and legal advisors. By these standards, most advance care planning in Canada is poorly executed, says Hanvey. End-of-life care typically isn’t broached until too late and many directives are not adequately prepared, communicated or utilized (www.chpca.net/projects/advance_care_planning/acp_environmental_scan_sept_9_09.pdf).

Figure

End-of-life care often isn’t broached until too late, when a crisis occurs or life-sustaining treatments have already been instituted despite a poor prognosis.

Image courtesy of © 2011 Jupiterimages Corp.

The draft framework highlights the role that family doctors can play in encouraging advance care planning conversations before the diagnosis of a chronic or terminal illness. But Hanvey says health care professionals often lack the training to actively initiate those conversations.

The draft framework also recommends integrating advance care planning core competencies into undergraduate and graduate education; training frontline staff to routinely check if patients have plans or directives; and developing online continuing education programs for health care providers. It also calls on the provincial–territorial ministries of health to provide resources to compensate physicians for time spent on advance care planning.

The draft framework notes that effective advance care planning has been linked to increased patient and family satisfaction with care, fewer hospitalizations and less resource use in nursing homes, fewer life-sustaining procedures, lower rates of intensive care unit admissions and, for advanced cancer patients, substantially lower health care costs in the final week of life. The final version of the framework will be released “in the near future.”

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 183 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 183, Issue 1
11 Jan 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
End-of-life planning framework calls for fewer checklists
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
End-of-life planning framework calls for fewer checklists
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Jan 2011, 183 (1) 33; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3746

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
End-of-life planning framework calls for fewer checklists
Lauren Vogel
CMAJ Jan 2011, 183 (1) 33; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3746
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What to know about Omicron XBB.1.5
  • Could a flu shot push help curb pediatric hospitalizations?
  • Stalemate: What’s holding up a new health accord?
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire