The authors state electronic health records (with some decision support) will save lives and improve outcomes. 1 Really? E-health has never consistently and demonstrably done either. Why should more information, alone, lead to better outcomes? Were physicians who did not quickly adopt thalidomide, rofecoxib, gastric freezing, or EC-IC bypass because of the lack of evidence for benefit and safety “dithering”? A conservative approach, weighing pros and cons, and watchful waiting for evidence of benefit without harms or unintended consequences should not be mistaken for dithering. I agree Canadians deserve nothing less than physicians who use proven effective interventions and technologies to help their patients feel better and live longer. Until e-health has proven itself safe, effective and affordable, maybe festina lente is rational: make haste, slowly.
Footnotes
-
For the full letter, go to: www.cmaj.ca/cgi/eletters/cmaj.092189v1#299106
REFERENCE
- 1.↵