Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Practice

Work-up for Cushing syndrome

Lisa-Ann Fraser and Stan Van Uum
CMAJ April 06, 2010 182 (6) 584-587; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090250
Lisa-Ann Fraser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stan Van Uum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 47-year-old woman was referred for assessment for Cushing syndrome. The patient’s history included well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus, for which she took two hypoglycemic agents orally, and hypertension, for which she took three medications. On questioning, the patient reported that she did not take herbal or alternative supplements and had never taken steroids. She had no history of osteoporosis, depression, weight gain, irritability or fatigue.

On physical examination, the patient’s weight was 67.7 kg, and her body mass index was 26 kg/m2. Her blood pressure was 128/80 mm Hg, and her heart rate was 68 beats/min. She had a very round face with prominent preauricular fat pads, as well as slight posterior cervical and supraclavicular fat pads (Figure 1). No proximal muscle weakness, striae, bruising, acne, hirsutism or thin skin were evident.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1: Facial roundness with prominent preauricular fat and supraclavicular pads of fat in a 47-year-old woman undergoing assessment for Cushing syndrome.

Two screening 24-hour urine collections for free cortisol were dramatically elevated at 2237 and 2736 (normal 120–384) nmol/d, suggesting Cushing syndrome. A fasting morning blood sample showed a cortisol level of 404 (normal 170–720) nmol/L and a borderline-high adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) level of 10.6 (normal 0.0–10.1) pmol/L.

An overnight suppression test with high-dose (8 mg) dexamethasone showed adequate suppression of cortisol (37 nmol/L) and ACTH (< 2.0 pmol/L). A magnetic resonance imaging scan of the sella was reported as inconclusive, showing a subtle abnormality within the right side of the pituitary gland.

What is your diagnosis?

  1. Ectopic ACTH-secreting tumour

  2. Cushing disease (pituitary adenoma)

  3. Exogenous steroid use

  4. Extreme stress

  5. Adrenal cortisol-producing adenoma

Discussion

The most likely diagnosis is (b) Cushing disease (pituitary adenoma). The patient’s borderline-high ACTH level points to an ACTH-dependent cause of Cushing syndrome. Overproduction of ACTH by a pituitary adenoma is known as Cushing disease and is one of several causes of Cushing syndrome — the constellation of a large group of signs and symptoms that reflect prolonged, inappropriately high exposure of tissue to glucocorticoids. The suppression of cortisol with high-dose dexamethasone and the results of magnetic resonance imaging point to a pituitary cause.

However, Cushing disease was not the correct diagnosis in this instance. Before discussing the reason, we will briefly review Cushing syndrome. For a thorough review, we refer readers to the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines of the Endocrine Society. 1

In normal physiology, various stressors induce the release of corticotropin-releasing hormone by the hypothalamus, resulting in release of ACTH by the pituitary. Cortisol and adrenal androgens (e.g., dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate) are in turn released by the adrenal glands. Cortisol has an inhibiting effect on the release of corticotropin-releasing hormone and ACTH that closes this negative feedback loop (Figure 2).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2: Regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, and the changes in Cushing syndrome. Solid arrows show a stimulatory effect. Dashed arrows indicate an inhibitory effect. *Cortisol may be reduced or elevated depending on whether the exogenous glucocorticoid is cortisol or another glucocorticoid. Note: ACTH = adrenocorticotropic hormone, CRH = corticotropin-releasing hormone, DHEAS = dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate.

In endogenous Cushing syndrome of pituitary origin, this negative feedback system no longer functions appropriately. The result is an increase in the release of adrenal cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, secondary to ongoing stimulation by ACTH. In adrenal Cushing syndrome, independent steroid production by the adrenal gland occurs, usually resulting in suppression of ACTH.

In exogenous Cushing syndrome, administration of an exogenous glucocorticoid suppresses the whole hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, resulting in low ACTH and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels (Figure 2). Endogenous Cushing syndrome is uncommon, with an incidence of two to three per million per year. 1 However, the diagnosis is important because the disease carries substantial morbidity and mortality. Elevated levels of cortisol may be associated with alcoholism, depression or obesity, making the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome more challenging with the co-occurrence of such conditions.

When to suspect Cushing syndrome

A complete history and physical examination are critical in determining the pretest likelihood of a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. Patients present with a wide range of clinical features (Table 1), 2 and no single symptom is necessary to the diagnosis. A high positive likelihood ratio (LR) for Cushing syndrome has been found in the presence of ecchymoses (LR 10.0–11.3), osteopenia or fracture (LR 8.0–13.8), proximal muscle weakness (LR 8.0–12.6) and hypertension (LR 4.35–5.29). 3 Many of the signs and symptoms of Cushing syndrome are common in the general population. But if they occur at an unusual stage of life (e.g., hypertension or osteoporosis in a young person) or if multiple and progressive features are present (particularly worsening control of diabetes or hypertension), then a diagnosis of Cushing syndrome should be considered. 2

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1: Clinical features of Cushing syndrome

The features of Cushing syndrome caused by exogenous steroids vary depending on the dose of the steroid used and the duration of use. Certain signs (e.g., cataracts, elevated intraocular pressure, necrosis of the femoral head, osteoporosis and pancreatitis) are more commonly associated with exogenous Cushing syndrome. 4 Other signs, such as hirsutism and elevated dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels, are more suggestive of endogenous steroidogenesis.

Exclusion of exogenous Cushing syndrome

When Cushing syndrome is clinically suspected, the first step is to exclude intake of glucocorticoids, which is the most common cause of Cushing syndrome. Exogenous Cushing syndrome usually results from oral or parenteral therapy with high-dose glucocorticoids, but has also been reported to result from use of inhalational, ocular and dermatologic preparations containing glucocorticoids. Cushing syndrome caused by low doses of glucocorticoids taken together with medication that inhibits their metabolism has also been reported. An overview of steroid medications that can cause Cushing syndrome is shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 2: Causes of exogenous Cushing syndrome

Screening tests for endogenous Cushing syndrome

After an exogenous cause has been excluded, diagnostic tests are used to determine if hypercortisolism is indeed present. Three screening tests are commonly used (Table 3). Testing at least twice for cortisol levels in urine and saliva is recommended. 1 Abnormal test results should prompt referral to an endocrinologist for an assessment of the likelihood of Cushing syndrome.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 3: Tests used to screen for hypercortisolism

If indicated, the endocrinologist will perform additional investigations to determine the exact cause of the hypersecretion of cortisol. Exogenous and endogenous causes will be differentiated first. When an endogenous cause is considered, further differentiation must be made between ACTH-dependent causes (i.e., Cushing disease; ectopic production of ACTH; ectopic production of corticotropin-releasing hormone) and ACTH-independent causes (i.e., adrenal adenoma or carcinoma) (Figure 2).

What is the next step?

  1. Transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenoma

  2. Sampling of inferior petrosal sinuses for ACTH

  3. Monitoring of symptoms at follow-up

  4. Repeat of 24-hour urine test for free cortisol

  5. Bilateral adrenal resection

In our patient, the urinary cortisol level was elevated to six to seven times the upper limit of the normal range, which is generally diagnostic for Cushing syndrome. Her morning ACTH was not suppressed, suggesting an ACTH-dependent form of Cushing syndrome rather than an adrenal adenoma. Further differentiation between a pituitary source of ACTH (i.e., Cushing disease) and ectopic ACTH is needed.

In the absence of conclusive magnetic resonance imaging of the pituitary, the next step would be sampling of the inferior petrosal veins for ACTH. However, we noted an apparent discrepancy between our patient’s very high urinary excretion of cortisol and her clinical presentation. She lacked proximal myopathy, bruising or striae, and her blood pressure and diabetes were well controlled. At the patient’s follow-up visit, therefore, we asked her specifically if she was using any creams, ointments or lotions. She then reported that she had been using a 2.5% hydrocortisone cream for over 20 years to treat itch on her arms, face, groin and vagina. She had not considered the cream to be a medication and so had not mentioned it before. The patient was instructed to discontinue its use. A 24-hour urine sample collected on the sixth and seventh days after discontinuation of the cream showed normal cortisol values of 225 and 153 nmol/day. To rule out cyclical Cushing syndrome, urine collections were repeated one and two months later. The results remained normal.

Hydrocortisone cream can cause elevated excretion of urinary cortisol by either of two mechanisms. One involves the absorption of high-potency steroid creams and has been reported in infants when creams are used inappropriately for diaper dermatitis, which results in Cushing syndrome and suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis in infants. 5,6 This has also been reported in adults using skin lightening creams containing steroids. The second mechanism involves direct contamination of urine during urination. Falsely elevated urinary levels of free cortisol have been reported in two patients who used a combined antifungal and hydrocortisone 1% preparation for vaginal candidiasis. 7 In our patient, this second mechanism was more likely, because absorption of hydrocortisone would have resulted in elevated systemic cortisol levels and convincing symptoms of Cushing syndrome. Intact negative feedback by the absorbed hydrocortisone acting on the secretion of pituitary ACTH would likely have resulted in a suppression of both ACTH and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (Figure 2).

This scenario shows how vaginal application of a topical cream containing hydrocortisone can cause falsely elevated urinary cortisol levels that mimic Cushing disease. Often such creams are used without a prescription. Patients may not regard topical lotions, creams and ointments as medicines or consider them relevant to an assessment for Cushing syndrome. Had the patient’s use of a steroid cream not been discovered, suspicion would have been high for a pituitary adenoma, and she likely would have undergone petrosal vein sampling, which is an invasive procedure. It is important to enquire specifically about the patient’s use of topical or other local therapies. Doing so could potentially prevent needless, costly testing and possible harm associated with invasive investigations or therapies.

Footnotes

  • Previously published at www.cmaj.ca

    This article has been peer reviewed.

    Competing interests: None declared.

    CMAJ invites submissions to “What is your call?” Clinical details (including images) are presented on the first page along with a multiple-choice question about the diagnosis. The answer and a brief discussion of the condition follow on the second page. We specifically invite submissions illustrating common or important radiographic and electrocardiographic diagnoses of appeal to a general audience. We generally allow up to five references and require authors to obtain consent from the patient for publication of his or her story (form available at www.cmaj.ca/authors/checklist.shtml). Submit manuscripts online at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cmaj.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:1526–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, et al. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet 2006;367:1605–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Hall JE, Nieman LK, editors. Handbook of diagnostic endocrinology: Cushing’s syndrome. New York (NY): Humana Press; 2003. p. 67–84.
  4. 4.↵
    Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, et al. Williams textbook of endocrinology. 11th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 467.
  5. 5.↵
    Guven A, Gulumser O, Ozgen T. Cushing’s syndrome and adrenocortical insufficiency caused by topical steroids: Misuse or abuse?J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2007;20:1173–82.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Ozon A. Cetinkaya S, Alikasifoglu A, et al. Inappropriate use of potent topical glucocroticoids in infants. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2007;20:219–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Kelly CJ, Ogilvie A, Evans JR, et al. Raised cortisol excretion rate in urine and contamination by topical steroids. BMJ 2001;322:594.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 182 (6)
CMAJ
Vol. 182, Issue 6
6 Apr 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Work-up for Cushing syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Work-up for Cushing syndrome
Lisa-Ann Fraser, Stan Van Uum
CMAJ Apr 2010, 182 (6) 584-587; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090250

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Work-up for Cushing syndrome
Lisa-Ann Fraser, Stan Van Uum
CMAJ Apr 2010, 182 (6) 584-587; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090250
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • What is your diagnosis?
    • Discussion
    • What is the next step?
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Duodenal duplication cyst in a 61-year-old man
  • A young woman with fever and polyserositis caused by familial Mediterranean fever
  • Screening for primary aldosteronism in primary care
Show more Practice

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire