Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Canadian physicians playing “catch-up” in adopting electronic medical records

Ann Silversides
CMAJ February 09, 2010 182 (2) E103-E104; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3126
Ann Silversides
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Canadian doctors lag behind their counterparts in many other developed nations in adopting basic electronic medical records largely because the emphasis in Canada has been on “the big building blocks” of electronic health records, says Bill Pascal, chief technology officer for the Canadian Medical Association.

“When you look at how far countries have moved towards a broader vision of electronic health information capability, Canada is not doing too badly,” Pascal says.

Comparatively less attention has gone to promoting the uptake of electronic medical records in physician offices in Canada, he adds. The lack of financial incentives and support for physicians to make the transition from paper records is also an issue.

Perhaps even more challenging than cost is the fact that “integration into workflow takes time, is likely to have a short-term negative impact and requires good change management practices to be successful,” says Khaled El Emam, Canada Research Chair in Electronic Health Information at the University of Ottawa in Ontario.

Those factors may help to explain the findings of a recent international survey which found that there is a “striking spread” across 11 developed countries in the adoption of electronic medical records (Health Affairs 2009;28[6]:w1171–w1183).

A Survey of Primary Care Physicians In Eleven Countries, 2009: Perspectives On Care, Costs, And Experiences found that only 37% of Canadian family physician respondents used electronic medical records in their practices, the lowest rate among the countries surveyed.

The 37% uptake represented an increase since 2006, when a study conducted for Canada Health Infoway found that 20% of Canadian family doctors used electronic medical records.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Roughly 63% of Canada's primary care physicians continue to rely on paper as their primary means of maintaining medical records. Image courtesy of © 2010 Jupiterimages Corp.

But Canada’s overall performance pales in contrast to rates in other countries: 99% of family doctors in the Netherlands use electronic medical records, and rates were in the 90s for Australia, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden and the United Kingdom. As well, Germany (72%), France (68%) and the United States (46%) all ranked above Canada.

Of course, electronic medical records in physician offices are only one piece of the larger electronic health record landscape, which includes other health information systems such as digitized lab results and prescription drug records.

If the electronic records “just reside on a desktop,” and there isn’t a lot of data integration with other systems, it’s not easy to see the benefits, says Kevin Leonard, a health policy, management and evaluation professor at the University of Toronto in Ontario.

The survey also revealed that Canadian family doctors again scored at the bottom with regard to the extent to which they used electronic means of performing functions such as gaining access to patients’ lab results and prescription drug information, or ordering medications and tests. Canada had the largest proportion (65%) of respondents who reported a low degree of electronic information functions, according to the survey, which was supported by the New York City, New York-based private foundation the Commonwealth Fund.

Financial incentives, standards and technical support at the national level supported the spread of electronic medical records in those countries with near-universal takeup, states the survey.

In Canada, the priority of Canada Health Infoway has been to help provinces develop repositories for information about prescription drugs, lab results and diagnostic imaging results, as well as to develop telehealth. The federally funded, nonprofit organization makes financial contributions to provincial health information technology initiatives.

Chief Executive Officer Richard Alvarez says that when Infoway was established there was “no appetite” among provinces to support electronic medical records. “So at a national level we had to make some difficult choices,” and a decision was made to “prepare the ground” by building the repositories so there would be value for physicians when they adopted electronic medical records.

“Now we are trying to play catch-up with the rest of the world” with respect to the adoption by physicians of electronic medical records, he adds.

Infoway was planning to spend $215 million of its most recent $500-million federal allocation on providing support for physician adoption of electronic medical records. But the federal government is withholding the $500 million until it completes a review of the national initiative.

Four national organizations, including the Canadian Medical Association, are urging that the monies be released. A 2009 CMA status report, Information technology and health care in Canada, states that there has been “significant growth” since 2007 in provincial programs to support electronic medical record initiatives. Five provinces now have such programs in place.

As well, the federal budget for fiscal year 2009/10 allowed physicians to deduct the total cost, in the first year, of eligible computer hardware and software purchases until early 2011.

But the CMA report indicates that the proportion of all doctors “using electronic charts exclusively in main patient setting” ranged from a low of 3.8% in Quebec to a high of 21.7% in Alberta.

Alberta also led the way in development of electronic health records, and key components such as drug and laboratory information systems are 95% to 100% complete in the province.

Family doctors in Canada are more likely than specialists to have adopted electronic medical records as “very little effort has been devoted to understanding the information requirements of specialists in relation to EMRs [electronic medical records],” the report adds.

Footnotes

  • Published at www.cmaj.ca on Dec. 4, 2009

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 182 (2)
CMAJ
Vol. 182, Issue 2
9 Feb 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Canadian physicians playing “catch-up” in adopting electronic medical records
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Canadian physicians playing “catch-up” in adopting electronic medical records
Ann Silversides
CMAJ Feb 2010, 182 (2) E103-E104; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3126

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Canadian physicians playing “catch-up” in adopting electronic medical records
Ann Silversides
CMAJ Feb 2010, 182 (2) E103-E104; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3126
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Progress in electronic medical record adoption in Canada
  • Perspectives on Electronic Medical Record Implementation after Two Years of Use in Primary Health Care Practice
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire