Article Figures & Tables
Figures
Figure 1: Recruitment of study patients. *Numbers total more than 522 because some children had more than one exclusion criterion. R = randomization.
Tables
Table 1: Baseline characteristics of 96 children with a minimally angulated fracture of the distal radius randomly assigned to receive either a prefabricated splint or a cast
Table 2: Between-group differences in outcomes among 96 children with a minimally angulated fracture of the distal radius given either a splint or a cast
Table 3: Minor complications from the immobilization devices recorded by the parents of 89 children with a minimally angulated fracture of the distal radius*
In this issue
Article tools
Respond to this article
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Factors affecting management of childrens low-risk distal radius fractures in the emergency department: a population-based retrospective cohort study
- Manipulation and reduction of paediatric fractures of the distal radius and forearm using intranasal diamorphine and 50% oxygen and nitrous oxide in the emergency department: a 2.5-year study
- Primary Care Physician Follow-up of Distal Radius Buckle Fractures
- Home Cast Removal for Stable Pediatric Forearm Fractures
- The treatment of stable paediatric forearm fractures using a cast that may be removed at home: Comparison with traditional management in a randomised controlled trial
- What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery
- A Splint Was Not Inferior to a Cast for Distal Radial Fracture in Children
- Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis
- Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis
- No difference in improvement in physical function between splint and cast at 6 weeks in children with minimally angulated fractures of the distal radius
- Sticks and stones and broken bones: Distal radius fractures in children
- Distal Radius Fractures: Cast or Splint?
- Splints are an effective alternative to casts for wrist fractures
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Collections
