Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement

Melissa C. Brouwers, Michelle E. Kho, George P. Browman, Jako S. Burgers, Francoise Cluzeau, Gene Feder, Béatrice Fervers, Ian D. Graham, Steven E. Hanna, Julie Makarski and ; for the AGREE Next Steps Consortium
CMAJ July 13, 2010 182 (10) 1045-1052; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091714
Melissa C. Brouwers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle E. Kho
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George P. Browman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jako S. Burgers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francoise Cluzeau
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gene Feder
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Béatrice Fervers
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian D. Graham
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven E. Hanna
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Makarski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 182 no. 10 1045-1052
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091714
PubMed 
20513780
History 
  • Published online July 12, 2010.

Article Versions

  • Latest version (May 31, 2010 - 08:20).
  • You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Copyright & Usage 
© 2010

Author Information

  1. Melissa C. Brouwers, PhD,
  2. Michelle E. Kho, BHSc(PT) MSc,
  3. George P. Browman, MD MSc,
  4. Jako S. Burgers, MD PhD,
  5. Francoise Cluzeau, PhD,
  6. Gene Feder, MD,
  7. Béatrice Fervers, MD PhD,
  8. Ian D. Graham, PhD,
  9. Steven E. Hanna, PhD,
  10. Julie Makarski, BSc,
  11. for the AGREE Next Steps Consortium
  1. From McMaster University (Brouwers, Kho, Hanna, Makarski); the Program in Evidence-based Care, Cancer Care Ontario (Brouwers), Hamilton, Ont.; British Columbia Cancer Agency (Browman), Victoria, BC; the Dutch Institute for Healthcare Improvement CBO and IQ Healthcare (Burgers), Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, the Netherlands; St. George’s University of London (Cluzeau), London, UK; the University of Bristol (Feder), Bristol, UK; Unité Cancer et Environement (Fervers), Université de Lyon – Centre Léon Bérard, Université Lyon 1, EA 4129, Lyon, France; and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Graham), Ottawa, Ont.
  1. Correspondence to:
    Dr. Melissa C. Brouwers, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Henderson site, G wing, Rm. 207, 711 Concession St., Hamilton ON L8V 1C3; mbrouwer{at}mcmaster.ca
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Usage statistics: May 2010 to January 2021

AbstractFullPdf
May 2010138044
Jun 20102890227
Jul 2010187188240
Aug 201088145150
Sep 20101296971
Oct 2010526360
Nov 2010584458
Dec 2010411634
Jan 2011362326
Feb 2011442834
Mar 2011453471
Apr 2011403134
May 2011272736
Jun 2011332236
Jul 2011663331
Aug 2011572032
Sep 2011601442
Oct 2011923430
Nov 2011965552
Dec 2011844049
Jan 2012864250
Feb 2012774552
Mar 2012714849
Apr 20121043043
May 2012963939
Jun 2012531831
Jul 2012522637
Aug 2012402816
Sep 2012572727
Oct 2012665165
Nov 20121133953
Dec 2012695539
Jan 20131238845
Feb 2013643023
Mar 2013542733
Apr 2013674338
May 2013722938
Jun 2013231518
Jul 2013332731
Aug 2013493425
Sep 2013455821
Oct 20137610636
Nov 2013404026
Dec 201348720
Jan 2014531316
Feb 2014541419
Mar 2014423334
Apr 2014632430
May 2014642116
Jun 2014353219
Jul 2014502433
Aug 2014383629
Sep 2014334022
Oct 2014632129
Nov 2014695329
Dec 2014774520
Jan 20156312116
Feb 20155716145
Mar 2015448027
Apr 2015398136
May 2015407235
Jun 2015536324
Jul 2015461621
Aug 2015532419
Sep 2015442421
Oct 2015571218
Nov 2015602540
Dec 2015513329
Jan 2016582724
Feb 2016811026
Mar 2016751345
Apr 201665730
May 2016601139
Jun 2016862129
Jul 2016613633
Aug 2016601611
Sep 2016681925
Oct 2016511621
Nov 2016432625
Dec 2016371118
Jan 2017351725
Feb 2017352410
Mar 2017653628
Apr 2017502520
May 2017372519
Jun 2017353012
Jul 2017523323
Aug 20173376
Sep 201727817
Oct 2017331415
Nov 20174213621
Dec 2017137317
Jan 2018147419
Feb 2018167036
Mar 2018195124
Apr 20181110521
May 2018139220
Jun 201887110
Jul 2018107324
Aug 201884519
Sep 201865217
Oct 2018155941
Nov 20181510137
Dec 201835429
Jan 2019186825
Feb 2019146529
Mar 2019197536
Apr 2019297226
May 2019133330
Jun 2019123026
Jul 2019205330
Aug 20192015429
Sep 2019345333
Oct 2019327160
Nov 2019306431
Dec 2019234734
Jan 2020219933
Feb 20203312826
Mar 20203112431
Apr 2020228750
May 2020198925
Jun 2020179531
Jul 2020247034
Aug 2020168133
Sep 20202310351
Oct 2020537640
Nov 2020369158
Dec 2020397337
Jan 2021226533

Cited By...

  • 244 Citations
  • Google Scholar
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 182 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 182, Issue 10
13 Jul 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement
Melissa C. Brouwers, Michelle E. Kho, George P. Browman, Jako S. Burgers, Francoise Cluzeau, Gene Feder, Béatrice Fervers, Ian D. Graham, Steven E. Hanna, Julie Makarski
CMAJ Jul 2010, 182 (10) 1045-1052; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091714

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement
Melissa C. Brouwers, Michelle E. Kho, George P. Browman, Jako S. Burgers, Francoise Cluzeau, Gene Feder, Béatrice Fervers, Ian D. Graham, Steven E. Hanna, Julie Makarski
CMAJ Jul 2010, 182 (10) 1045-1052; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091714
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application
  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The Irish National Adverse Event Study-2 (INAES-2): longitudinal trends in adverse event rates in the Irish healthcare system
  • Clinical preventive guidelines for school-aged children and adolescents in primary care: a protocol for a systematic review
  • Quality appraisal of clinical guidelines for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review
  • PARTNER: a service delivery model to implement optimal primary care management of people with knee osteoarthritis: description of development
  • What does best practice care for musculoskeletal pain look like? Eleven consistent recommendations from high-quality clinical practice guidelines: systematic review
  • Diagnosis and treatment for hyperuricemia and gout: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements
  • Guidelines on the intraoperative transfusion of red blood cells: a protocol for systematic review
  • Modified Delphi survey for the evidence summarisation of patient decision aids: Study protocol
  • Mixed connective tissue disease: state of the art on clinical practice guidelines
  • Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth mental health disorders: protocol for a systematic review and consensus exercise
  • A systematic review and appraisal of the quality of practice guidelines for the management of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections
  • STANDING Collaboration: a study protocol for developing clinical standards
  • Developing a Clinician Friendly Tool to Identify Useful Clinical Practice Guidelines: G-TRUST
  • Diagnosis and treatment for hyperuricaemia and gout: a protocol for a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and consensus statements
  • Quality of clinical practice guidelines in delirium: a systematic appraisal
  • Diagnosis and management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: clinical practice guideline
  • Collaborative Research in Childhood Cancer Survivorship: The Current Landscape
  • Priorities for Quality Care in Pediatric Oncology Supportive Care
  • An evaluation of cataract surgery clinical practice guidelines
  • Acute Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Appraisal of Guidelines
  • Management of Bell palsy: clinical practice guideline
  • Roadmap for Publishing Clinical Practice Guidelines in PTJ
  • Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Procedural Pain: A Systematic Review
  • Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise
  • Occupational Asthma guidelines: a systematic quality appraisal using the AGREE II instrument
  • Independent appraiser assessment of the quality, methodological rigour and transparency of the development of the 2008 international consensus statement on concussion in sport
  • Ensuring the integrity of clinical practice guidelines: a tool for protecting patients
  • Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Children With Cancer and/or Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research Paradigm: Implications for Systematic Reviews and Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • A guide to the translation of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy into improved care
  • Rigour of development does not AGREE with recommendations in practice guidelines on the use of ice for acute ankle sprains
  • The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies
  • Clinical guidelines may need ethical component
  • Quality evidence important for quality guidelines
  • Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Emergency department use following incentives to provide after-hours primary care: a retrospective cohort study
  • Physician choices in pulmonary embolism testing
  • Symptoms associated with a positive result for a swab for SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in Alberta
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire