Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Out, damn Spot

Dan Lett
CMAJ October 27, 2009 181 (9) E201; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3045
Dan Lett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The Canadian Lung Association will escalate its lobbying effort to persuade Canada’s airline industry to remove pets from passenger cabins to protect people with severe asthma and pet-related allergies.

“We get that people want to travel with their pets but we just don’t understand why people need to travel with their pets in the cabin of an airplane,” says spokesman Cameron Bishop. “This is not to be unsympathetic to pet owners but our first responsibility is to people with respiratory problems.”

Air Canada recently opted to become more pet-friendly by rescinding its 2006 ban on small pets travelling in passenger cabins, provided they are contained within small cages or kennels that fit under a seat. Service animals remain exempt, as they were during the period in which Air Canada prohibited pets in cabins.

Bishop says the association wants small, nonservice animals placed in the same pressurized, heated cargo bay compartments that now house larger pets that travel.

The association organized a letter-writing campaign calling on the House of Common’s Standing Committee on Health Care to examine pet-friendly airline policies. The campaign does not address the issue of limits on passenger use of perfume, which many Canadians say is as great, or even greater, an irritant. But Bishop says there is a chance that the association would raise the issue should Parliament agree to hearings on banning small pets from airline cabins.

Bishop says it is ironic that Air Canada rescinded its prohibition on small pets travelling with their owners, given that the airline went nut-free several years ago to protect passengers with severe allergies. Only 1.5% of Canadians suffer severe nut allergies, while 8% of Canadians over the age of 12 suffer from severe asthma and nearly a third suffer from allergies of some sort.

The lung association says its campaign is augmented by a national public opinion poll that found 80% of Canadians want airlines to offer pet-free flights, while nearly three-quarters believe the federal government should step into the fray.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The Canadian Lung Association would like all pets, except for service animals, confined to cargo bays on airplanes. Image courtesy of © 2009 Jupiterimages Corp.

Also calling for prohibitions on pets in passenger cabins were delegates to the Canadian Medical Association’s recent annual general meeting in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

Resolution sponsor and Newfound-land and Labrador Medical Association President Dr. Brendan Lewis argues that a ban should be introduced, if only to prevent one passenger from becoming sick.

While there have not been a great number of documented cases of asthmatic passengers suffering attacks after being exposed to pets in close quarters, the high incidence of asthma and environmental allergies justifies a move to limit pets, he says. “If there is a chance that even one person could become seriously ill from being exposed to a pet on a flight, then we have to be diligent and pursue policies and practices to protect those people.”

Lewis adds that a search of medical literature reveals no definitive findings on the health impacts of pets on flights. He also notes that no one has been able to determine whether the air circulation systems in modern aircrafts diminish the threat from pet dander, or increase the threat as air is recirculated through the passenger cabin.

The lack of conclusive evidence appears to lie at the heart of Air Canada’s decision to become more pet-friendly.

Spokesman Peter Fitzpatrick says the airline is confident that a limited number of small pets on flights does not present a significant health risk to asthmatic passengers. He adds that the majority of the world’s airlines allow small pets in passenger cabins and there have been very few reported cases of other passengers suffering from asthma attacks or other respiratory ailments.

Fitzpatrick also notes that the United States Federal Aviation Authority research concluded that the clothes of pet owners present more of a risk to asthma-prone passengers than the pets themselves.

Even if pets were banned from passenger cabins, it is impossible to ensure that flights are free of pet dander, Fitzpatrick adds. “For most of our history, we’ve carried pets in our cabins. It’s a long-standing position and it’s widespread in our industry.”

Calgary, Alberta-based WestJet Airlines has never banned pets from passenger cabins and has no current plans to do so. But spokesman Robert Palmer says the airline would consider potential compromises to protect passengers with respiratory ailments, should the Canadian Lung Association make a pitch for restrictions.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 181 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 181, Issue 9
27 Oct 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Out, damn Spot
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Out, damn Spot
Dan Lett
CMAJ Oct 2009, 181 (9) E201; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3045

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Out, damn Spot
Dan Lett
CMAJ Oct 2009, 181 (9) E201; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3045
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Does shaming have a place in public health?
  • Trudeau promises to boost federal health transfers when the pandemic is over
  • Should Canada aim for #CovidZero?
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire