Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • Classified ads
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Euthanasia debate reignited

Roger Collier
CMAJ October 13, 2009 181 (8) 463-464; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-3034
Roger Collier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Euthanasia Debate Reignited
    Marcel Boisvert
    Posted on: 14 October 2009
  • Posted on: (14 October 2009)
    Euthanasia Debate Reignited
    • Marcel Boisvert

    It is notable that after all those years of discussions which followed the Sue Rodriguez case, we are still insinuating that « pain so intense » (which painkillers do not alleviate) leads near-death patients to ask that their life be ended.

    Thanks to Palliative Care (and others), pain management has made so much progress in the last 40 years that most studies have shown that pain is NOT the primary reason to re...

    Show More

    It is notable that after all those years of discussions which followed the Sue Rodriguez case, we are still insinuating that « pain so intense » (which painkillers do not alleviate) leads near-death patients to ask that their life be ended.

    Thanks to Palliative Care (and others), pain management has made so much progress in the last 40 years that most studies have shown that pain is NOT the primary reason to request euthanasia. Often, pain ranks 4th, 5th or lower (1). Reflecting on “modern dying”, bio-ethicist Hubert Doucet wrote : “With good pain management, we thought we had rendered dying more humane. We now discover that a dying person’s life does not necessarily regain sense because he has been relieved of his pains. …Now looms the real question about the meaning of life : why live if only to await death”(2). The commonest motives are existential, a much less relievable type of suffering: profound deterioration, progressive loss of autonomy, inacceptable dependency, all leading to meaninglessness, even in spite of excellent palliative care. In a recent Canadian study, 6% of 379 Palliative Care cancer patients wanted euthanasia “now” (3). Autonomy has undergone a paradigm shift in the last few decades. As mentioned in the Philosophers’ Brief presented to the USA Supreme Court : “Most of us see death –whatever we think will follow it- as the final act of life’s drama, and we want the last act to reflect our own convictions, those we have tried to live by, not the convictions of others forced on us in our most vulnerable moment” (4). Modern dying, for a few, has become unacceptable. That explains the 80% support of Canadians, and that of 75% of Quebec’s specialists recently reported.

    Yes, when appropriate and so wished by a near-death patient, euthanasia should be the “ultimate palliation”.

    Marcel Boisvert md Retired palliative care physician.

    1. Heyland, KD. et al. What Matters Most in End of Life Care CMAJ Feb. 28th 2006.

    2. Doucet, H. La quête d’une bonne mort. Info-Kara Dec. 1993.(my translation)

    3. Wilson, KG et al. Desire for Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide in Palliative Cancer

    Care. Health Psychol. 26(3), 314-323, 2007.

    4. The Philosophers Brief. The New York Review of Books. Vol.44(5), 1997.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 181 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 181, Issue 8
13 Oct 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Euthanasia debate reignited
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Euthanasia debate reignited
Roger Collier
CMAJ Oct 2009, 181 (8) 463-464; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3034

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Euthanasia debate reignited
Roger Collier
CMAJ Oct 2009, 181 (8) 463-464; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.109-3034
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Physician-assisted deaths under the euthanasia law in Belgium: a population-based survey
  • Euthanasia debate reignited
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What’s important to know about the new COVID-19 variants?
  • Women experts underrepresented in pandemic coverage
  • Canada will have three-digit suicide prevention hotline by 2023
Show more News

Similar Articles

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire