Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

Miss Scarlett, in the laboratory, with the microscope

Chelsea Maedler-Kron
CMAJ September 01, 2009 181 (5) E79; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091218
Chelsea Maedler-Kron
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

There is a small newspaper clipping, engulfed by a slew of other notices and warnings, which stays quietly pinned to a cork-board in our lunchroom in the Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute here at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario.

It was a rebuttal written by a local resident with regards to our research on cancer stem cells. It stated “unless this major breakthrough is the result of adult and not embryonic stem cell research, then Institute’s ethics are suspect.”

The first time I read this article I laughed in sheer naivety and denial.

My ethics are not suspect, nor are my intentions or beliefs. I plan to do great things with my training as an MD/PhD student, great things to cure cancer and save the world and all of those other things clinicians voice to their patients or researchers write in their grants.

My unadulterated love for research is pure, stem cells are clean beautiful microcosms to observe and if I work hard enough I will be rewarded and save patient lives.

These were all myths, floating memes that bathed me in a warm broth of disillusion until I reread the 1-inch paper clipping another time.

I realized that no matter how much you do, nothing is embraced without public understanding, no matter what the controversial topic, nothing is relayed without patience, and no matter how hard you work, nothing comes easy.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Image courtesy of Photos.com

In medical research, every step is a fight; first battling your own self-doubt, then that of your peers; required and trained to challenge every step of your methodology and finally facing the world, embodied in a paper clipping, which may never fully embrace what you do or agree, but is the reason you can and will continue on.

Now, as I eat lunch everyday, I stare at the clipping contemplating how much impact it has had on how I perceive myself as a future clinician scientist and how much of a suspect (and not a hero) I am considered in this game of “Clue” we call medical research.

Footnotes

  • CMAJ invites contributions to “Dispatches from the medical front,” in which physicians and other health care providers offer eyewitness glimpses of medical frontiers, whether defined by location or intervention. Submissions, which must run a maximum 700 words, should be forwarded to: wayne.kondro{at}cmaj.ca.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 181 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 181, Issue 5
1 Sep 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Miss Scarlett, in the laboratory, with the microscope
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Miss Scarlett, in the laboratory, with the microscope
Chelsea Maedler-Kron
CMAJ Sep 2009, 181 (5) E79; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091218

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Miss Scarlett, in the laboratory, with the microscope
Chelsea Maedler-Kron
CMAJ Sep 2009, 181 (5) E79; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091218
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Monkeypox: tracking the global health emergency
  • Making sense of monkeypox death rates
  • Providing abortions to Americans could land Canadian doctors in legal trouble — without CMPA assistance
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire