Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

H1N1 influenza vaccine: Global access for a global problem

Noni MacDonald
CMAJ August 04, 2009 181 (3-4) 123; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091100
Noni MacDonald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

More than 90% of the world’s capacity to manufacture influenza vaccines is concentrated in Europe and North America. Pressure to protect one’s own citizens will be intense during any pandemic. If any of the countries where these plants are located choose to nationalize the companies making the vaccine or to stop the vaccine from crossing their borders, the critical vaccine supply line will be choked. Ironically, the negative consequences of any such action would affect not only people outside the protectionist country but also those inside the country.

Equitable access to a vaccine against a pandemic influenza virus is an ethical issue involving justice for all. It is also a prerequisite for the success of any pandemic strategy to safeguard global health. As the novel H1N1 A influenza outbreak has revealed, developing a vaccine to respond to an emerging pandemic strain is a difficult task. Manufacturing and distribution capacity reside at the heart of this challenge.

Although the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others have been working hard to develop candidate influenza strains for vaccine manufacturers in advance of the H1N1 A strain’s likely return during this coming influenza season, it has taken longer then expected. Furthermore, once clinical lots of a vaccine have been produced, trials must be conducted to determine the concentration and number of required doses and to obtain preliminary safety data. Only then can manufacturers gear up production. As a result, an H1N1 vaccine may not be ready until November.

Even after production begins, the global shortage of manufacturing capacity for the influenza vaccine will hamper efforts to combat a pandemic, particularly because production of a vaccine against a pandemic strain will have to compete with production of the regular influenza vaccine for the annual influenza season. There are close to 7 billion people in the world, but we have the capacity to generate only 1–2 billion doses of vaccine per year according to conservative estimates. The gap between global supply and demand is further exaggerated if individuals require 2 doses of vaccine (a priming and a boosting dose) to protect against a novel strain. 1

Even if existing manufacturing plants could increase production capacity, there would still be a distribution problem. As part of their pandemic preparedness, many industrialized countries, including Canada, have negotiated contracts with vaccine companies to supply the pandemic vaccine, once it has been developed. The Canadian Pandemic Influenza Plan prioritizes distribution of the vaccine, under the assumption that Canada’s entire population would be vaccinated over a 4-month period. 1 GlaxoSmithKline has announced that it has already received orders from several other industrialized countries aiming to stockpile an H1N1 A vaccine as a precautionary step. 2

But where do these plans leave less developed countries who have no signed contracts or who do not have the financial resources to secure vaccines? And how can a pandemic strategy succeed, given the speed and accessibility of global travel, unless we vaccinate people in all regions of the world?

More than a century ago, fire brigades would only come to the properties of people who had paid in advance for this service. Firefighting services became universal once it was learned that paying for your own fire protection was useless if the unprotected building next door caught fire. If individual countries or whole regions do not have access to pandemic influenza vaccine, then, like a fire, the pandemic influenza virus will continue to spread and evolve. Given that any new vaccine is unlikely to be 100% protective, some people who have been vaccinated in the fortunate countries with access to vaccine will still be at risk of infection from unprotected populations.

In the face of this threat, we need to ensure wide and equitable access to any pandemic influenza vaccine. In the short term, nations should join the World Health Organization’s campaign that urges pharmaceutical companies to donate a minimum of 10% of their pandemic vaccine production to developing countries — or at least to offer the vaccine at a price that these countries can afford. As of May 20, 2009, 6 of the 30 major manufacturers had agreed to this plan; greater participation is needed. Canada can take a leadership role not only by supporting this private-sector initiative but also by reserving 10% of its own purchase for use in developing countries. These proposed contributions still won’t be nearly enough to vaccinate the entire population of developing countries. Currently, these countries do not even have access to routine annual influenza vaccine. Providing even limited access to a pandemic influenza vaccine would be a big step forward. Just call it enlightened self-interest.

In the longer-term, Canada must help develop a global initiative to increase the international capacity to manufacture influenza vaccine and to achieve a worldwide agreement on vaccine distribution. Just consider it global firefighting.

Footnotes

  • Published at www.cmaj.ca on June 18, 2009.

    Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/misc/edboard.shtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Public Health Agency of Canada. The Canadian pandemic influenza plan for the Health Sector. Annex D: Preparing for the pandemic vaccine response [updated 2008 Sep. 5]. Ottawa (ON): The Agency; 2006. Available: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cpip-pclcpi/ann-d-eng.php#2 (accessed 2009 Jun. 11).
  2. 2.↵
    GlaxoSmithKline update: A (H1N1) influenza vaccine development. Glaxo-SmithKline; 2009. Available: www.gsk.com/media/pressreleases/2009/2009_pressrelease_10054.htm (accessed 2009 Jun. 11).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 181 (3-4)
CMAJ
Vol. 181, Issue 3-4
4 Aug 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
H1N1 influenza vaccine: Global access for a global problem
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
H1N1 influenza vaccine: Global access for a global problem
Noni MacDonald
CMAJ Aug 2009, 181 (3-4) 123; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091100

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
H1N1 influenza vaccine: Global access for a global problem
Noni MacDonald
CMAJ Aug 2009, 181 (3-4) 123; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091100
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Investigation of the first cases of human-to-human infection with the new swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in Canada
  • Modelling an influenza pandemic: A guide for the perplexed
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Les répercussions des compressions budgétaires de l’AMC sur le Groupe JAMC
  • The impact of CMA budget cuts on CMAJ Group
  • L’intégration de la pratique sage-femme au Canada
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Global health
    • Infectious diseases

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire