Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Holiday Review

Writing about colleagues

Lara Hazelton
CMAJ December 08, 2009 181 (12) E295-E296; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.091878
Lara Hazelton
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Many doctors like to write about their experiences in medicine, myself included. In part, this is because people often write about what they know best, or in the case of physicians, the only thing they know anything about at all (medicine) and the only people they really care about even slightly (themselves). Physicians may also have an unconscious motive for writing, such as the desire to be paid a few hundred dollars extra to get a spiffy new pair of shoes or an hour at the spa. Actually, that may be a conscious motive, as my analyst pointed out to me last week when I was telling him about this article I was writing.

I started seeing Dr. Janus because Hollywood led me to believe it would be a cool thing to do. So far, it has been disappointing. “Come now, Lara,” he said patiently, “I refuse to believe that your creative impetus derives solely from a shallow materialism investing your ego impulses in retrogressive, compensatory gratification. When I read some of your articles, I sense a thinly veiled hostility directed toward colleagues, who invariably embody the manifest stereotypical characteristics of their specialties, and I wonder if what we are seeing is an act of aggression, an effort to preserve narcissistic mastery in the face of vestigial sibling rivalry and subsumed oedipal conflict.”

I looked up at the ceiling (which has the most appallingly tacky light fixture I have seen outside a reality TV show) and reflected that the lady analyst on the Sopranos was really much nicer than Dr. Janus, not to mention a whole lot easier to understand.

Nonetheless, he did get me thinking about the possible motivations one might have, besides money, for writing about colleagues. These include:

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Image courtesy of © 2009 Jupiterimages Corp.

  1. Flattery. If properly done, writing really nice things about colleagues can get you free drinks at the department holiday party.

  2. Seduction. Writing really, really nice things will get you those drinks in someone else’s apartment after the holiday party wraps up. Or so I’m told.

  3. Self-aggrandizement. I was going to say that this is only a problem if the physician–writer is a surgeon, but then I recalled something Dr. Janus said about manifest stereotypical bodies, so perhaps I’ll let it pass.

  4. Revenge. This is probably the number one reason docs will write about colleagues. Of course, nobody ever admits this is why they wrote that moving essay about the patient who was dying in the intensive care unit, the one who was treated so rudely by the attending physician and then tenderly ministered to by a particularly sensitive and insightful clinical clerk who was the only person that truly connected with the patient. They will tell you the motivation in writing the piece was to privilege the voice of the (composite) patient, not to stick it to the insensitive bastard who made life a Technicolor version of hell for the six weeks they were stuck on his service. Speaking hypothetically here.

Given these diverse motivations, here are some simple guidelines I would like to propose as someone who has spent at least 30 minutes or so thinking about the subject with an analyst who, regrettably, looks nothing like Richard Gere in Final Analysis. Not that I went into analysis thinking he would, of course.

  1. Don’t write about real people, or if you do, combine three or four real people together to create a composite character. Like Dr. Janus except nice, like the Sopranos lady, and better looking.

  2. Don’t assume that just because you never bother to read anything in your field, nobody else does either. It’s amazing how many people read journals and medical trade publications, especially the issue where you admit to having a crush on your immediate supervisor.

  3. Don’t write nasty things about colleagues who also write about colleagues on a regular basis. I once got into a prolonged battle with... Wait, scratch that.

Other authors will likely wish to further elucidate these points and add more, which I would encourage because it means they’ll cite me, which is kind of cool when it (rarely) happens. If any of these authors wish to contact me, I would urge them to do so. I love collaborating with new colleagues, and who knows, perhaps they’ll find themselves in print some day as a particularly charming facet of Dr. Janus’s personality. If so, I hope I get invited over for a lime daiquiri.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 181 (12)
CMAJ
Vol. 181, Issue 12
8 Dec 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Writing about colleagues
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Writing about colleagues
Lara Hazelton
CMAJ Dec 2009, 181 (12) E295-E296; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091878

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Writing about colleagues
Lara Hazelton
CMAJ Dec 2009, 181 (12) E295-E296; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091878
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Snappy answers to stupid questions: an evidence-based framework for responding to peer-review feedback
  • A report on the zombie outbreak of 2009: how mathematics can save us (no, really)
  • How random is the toss of a coin?
Show more Holiday Review

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire