Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
News

High-profile death throws spotlight on error reports

Dan Lett
CMAJ April 28, 2009 180 (9) E21-E22; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090528
Dan Lett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Manitoba’s medical error reporting system — thought to be among the most progressive in the country — has been rocked by allegations that senior regional health officials failed to disclose key facts surrounding the high-profile death of a man who languished for 34 hours in a Winnipeg emergency room without receiving treatment.

Manitoba is generally considered one of the leading jurisdictions in Canada when it comes to laws and protocols for encouraging the disclosure of medical errors, or critical incidents as the provincial government calls them. The province is one of only 3 with legislation that allows doctors to apologize to patients and their families without fear it will be interpreted as an admission of liability. The province also compels health care workers to come forward with details of critical incidents, but protects them from publicity and legal liability.

However, that system has been shaken by the recent disclosure of additional facts surrounding the death of Brian Sinclair, a homeless man who died after spending nearly a day and a half unattended in the emergency room of the Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg’s largest hospital.

The disclosures have elicited concerns that health care officials were trying to bury troubling facts about the case, concerns that some critics believe have eroded other positive aspects of the medical error reporting and investigation system.

“I think what we’re seeing now is that if you have bad people running the system, it doesn’t matter how good the system is,” says Arthur Schafer, director of the University of Manitoba’s Centre for Professional and Applied Ethics. “You need both good people and a good system to address a problem like this.”

Winnipeg Regional Health Authority officials apologized publicly for the incident and launched 2 internal investigations. However, the authority initially claimed Sinclair, 45, went untreated because he did not approach the triage desk, and thus was never registered in a queue to see a physician. That version of events was challenged in February, when Manitoba’s chief medical officer revealed that video surveillance showed Sinclair did in fact approach the triage desk. He also noted that security guards alerted medical personnel that Sinclair’s condition was deteriorating, but no one took action.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

FIGURE. Manitoba’s medical error reporting system has been held up as a beacon of progress but that reputation has been dimmed because key fact were initially suppressed in last year’s death of a 45-year-old man who spent 34 hours in the waiting room of the Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre. Image courtesy of Health Sciences Centre Winnipeg

Authority officials have since admitted that they “misspoke.” A coroner’s inquest is expected this spring.

Patient safety advocate Leslie Worthington says the case highlights inadequacies in the current system for reporting and investigating medical errors. Worthington says Manitoba has attempted to elicit greater disclosure by promising to keep the identity of individuals and specifics of their actions from the public. But the case demonstrates that the system may not be able to own up to all the mistakes that were made, she says. “The system is not bad, but it’s not working. Manitoba is doing a lot of things nobody else is doing [in the area of patient safety and reporting], but there is a lack of leadership that keeps the system from doing all it could be.”

But Winnipeg Regional Health Authority Director of Patient Safety Dr. Rob Robson defends Manitoba’s critical incident reporting and investigation system as leading edge. “I personally don’t see this [the Sinclair case] as a setback. This was totally preventable and it was a tragedy. It simply says that we have lots and lots more work to do.”

In 2005, Manitoba introduced legislation that compelled health care workers to disclose facts surrounding a critical incident, and provide full disclosure of all facts to patients and families while still protecting individual health care workers from publicity and legal action. The amendments to the Regional Health Authorities Act and the Manitoba Evidence Act also prescribed mandatory internal investigations of all critical incidents.

Yet, in a unique twist, the legislation prevented investigators from revealing the identity of any health care worker involved in a critical incident, and ensured that critical incident reports could not be used in a civil or criminal proceeding.

Robson says the amendments were designed to encourage health care workers to come forward with details of medical mistakes without fear it would end their careers. Health care workers can be disciplined for their roles in critical incidents, but consideration is given if disclosure is made voluntarily.

In 2008, Manitoba followed up the reforms by introducing regular publication of critical incident learning summaries and then became the third province in the country to adopt an apology act that allows any health care worker, including physicians, to apologize for any medical mistake without fear the gesture will be used as an admission of liability.

All provinces suffer from a lack of reporting about critical incidents, Robson says, estimating that of the roughly 1800 critical incidents in the province’s hospitals and personal care homes annually, only about 200 are actually reported.

Manitoba’s reporting rate, about 14%, is actually considered among the best in Canada. “Those numbers say to me that we’re on the right track. But we have a long way to go to get reporting rates to the place it needs to be,” Robson says.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (9)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 9
28 Apr 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
High-profile death throws spotlight on error reports
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
High-profile death throws spotlight on error reports
Dan Lett
CMAJ Apr 2009, 180 (9) E21-E22; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090528

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
High-profile death throws spotlight on error reports
Dan Lett
CMAJ Apr 2009, 180 (9) E21-E22; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090528
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire