Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Tackling the epidemic of childhood obesity

Louise A. Baur
CMAJ March 31, 2009 180 (7) 701-702; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090196
Louise A. Baur
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The rising prevalence of childhood obesity in most developed countries is well recognized,1 as are the many short-and long-term complications that can occur as a result.2 The past decade has seen a rapid growth in research into various aspects of this epidemic. However, in most countries, there has been a far slower response in terms of the number of funded policies and services aimed at preventing and treating childhood obesity. What strategies should be implemented?

In this issue of CMAJ, Harris and colleagues3 report the results of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials designed to determine the effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index among children.3 The 18 included studies mainly targeted elementary school children and covered a range of interventions, including moderate to vigorous physical activity, increased school time for exercise, and weight bearing exercises. Their meta-analysis showed that specific physical activity interventions did not result in additional improvements in body mass index compared with existing physical activity curricula. Several explanations for this lack of association are suggested by the authors, including an insufficient “dose” of physical activity, possible poor adherence to the planned interventions, inherent limitations of using body mass index as a measure of body composition and the possibility that dietary modification may have a greater influence on body composition than physical activity.

Importantly, the authors comment that the results of their systematic review should not negate the importance of promoting physical activity in schools. They rightly point out the many other health benefits from school-based physical activity, including improvements in bone mineral density, blood pressure, lean muscle mass and aerobic capacity. However, their results raise questions about tackling the epidemic of childhood obesity: What is the optimal approach to prevent obesity? How can children already affected by obesity best be helped?

A 2007 governmental report from the United Kingdom describes obesity as a “complex system,” with an individual's energy intake and energy output, and hence weight, being influenced by a range of highly interconnected factors.4 These factors can operate at the individual level (e.g., genetic predisposition to obesity, level of satiety, stress level, learned activity patterns) or at the broader environmental and societal level (e.g., how suitable an area is for walking, abundance and price of food, portion sizes, societal pressure to consume, food marketing). No simple or short-term changes, such as a physical activity intervention for a limited length of time in the school curriculum, can be expected to influence the prevalence of obesity. Such an approach can be described as “the futility of isolated initiatives.”4

Instead, a case can be made for investment in a range of community-based cross-disciplinary long-term strategies that work at multiple levels. Examples might include the provision of healthy school meals, improved urban planning (e.g., provision of bicycle lanes and increased accessibility of public transportation), control of the advertising of foods with high fat, salt and sugar contents, and subsidies on vegetables and fruit for certain groups (e.g., child care centres and schools). This system-wide approach makes sense, but it will require a great deal of political will, community ownership and governmental, societal and industrial commitment to bring it into effect. Recent evidence suggesting that the obesity prevalence rates in France plateaued following a range of multilevel interventions provides a glimmer of hope for other countries, even those that have a more entrenched “obesogenic” environment.5

Appropriate investment in the prevention of obesity is only one part of a response to childhood obesity. Given the large number of affected children in many countries, there is an urgent need for the provision of effective treatment services. This is where there is a major role for physicians, particularly those working in primary care or pediatrics. For example, regular monitoring of children's height and weight and the use of body mass index–for age charts can help physicians to recognize overweight or obese children, and the issue can be raised sensitively with the children or their families.6 The principles of childhood obesity treatment are well established (Box 1).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 1.

Despite our increased understanding of the elements of obesity treatment, no health system has yet developed a sustainable and coordinated model of clinical service delivery for treatment of obesity that allows access for children and their families to affordable and effective primary, secondary and tertiary programs of care. Nor does any health system have a health workforce that is, as yet, sufficiently trained to cope with the clinical load of obese children and their families. Such a situation raises the urgent need for clinicians, researchers and health administrators to develop, evaluate and implement workable approaches to providing effective clinical care for the many children and young people affected by obesity.

@@ See related research paper by Harris and colleagues, page 719

    Key points

  • School-based physical-activity programs do not decrease the prevalence of childhood obesity, but they are associated with a range of other health benefits.

  • Multilevel, whole-society strategies for physical activity and food intake are needed to tackle obesity.

  • Children and young people affected by obesity need effective treatment interventions that include family physicians and pediatricians.

  • No health system has implemented a sustainable and coordinated model of delivery for services for obesity prevention and treatment.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Wang Y, Lobstein T. Worldwide trends in childhood overweight and obesity. Int J Pediatr Obes 2006;1:11-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Lobstein T, Baur L, Uauy R; for the IASO International Obesity TaskForce. Obesity in children and young people: a crisis in public health. Obes Rev 2004;5(Suppl 1):4-104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Harris KC, Kuramoto LK, Schulzer M, et al. Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009;180:719-26.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Butland B, Jebb S, Kopelman P, et al. Foresight. Tackling obesities: future choices — project report. London (UK): Government Office for Science; 2007. Available: www.foresight.gov.uk/Obesity/17.pdf (accessed 2009 Feb. 25).
  5. 5.↵
    Czernichow S, Maillard-Teyssier L, Vergnaud AC, et al. Trend towards a stabilization of obesity prevalence in France: a population-based study, 1995–2005 [abstract]. Int J Obes 2008;32(Suppl 1):S32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    Kipping RR, Jago R, Lawlor DA. Obesity in children. Part 1: Epidemiology, measurement, risk factors, and screening. BMJ 2008;337:a1824.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    Oude Luttikhuis H, Baur L, Jansen H, et al. Interventions for treating obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):CD001872.
  8. 8.
    Dietz WH, Robinson TN. Clinical practice. Overweight children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2100-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.
    Golan M, Crow S. Targeting parents exclusively in the treatment of childhood obesity: long-term results. Obes Res 2004;12:357-61.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (7)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 7
31 Mar 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tackling the epidemic of childhood obesity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tackling the epidemic of childhood obesity
Louise A. Baur
CMAJ Mar 2009, 180 (7) 701-702; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090196

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Tackling the epidemic of childhood obesity
Louise A. Baur
CMAJ Mar 2009, 180 (7) 701-702; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090196
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Dans ce numéro
  • Highlights
  • Effect of school-based physical activity interventions on body mass index in children: a meta-analysis
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • How training affects Australian paediatricians' management of obesity
  • Evaluating Parents and Adult Caregivers as "Agents of Change" for Treating Obese Children: Evidence for Parent Behavior Change Strategies and Research Gaps: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Ensuring timely genetic diagnosis in adults
  • The case for improving the detection and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea following stroke
  • Laser devices for vaginal rejuvenation: effectiveness, regulation and marketing
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Pediatrics

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire