Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Spirometry in primary care practices

Matthew B. Stanbrook and Alan Kaplan
CMAJ February 17, 2009 180 (4) 430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1090001
Matthew B. Stanbrook MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Kaplan MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The authors respond:

We thank Anthony D'Urzo for his thoughtful comments. Our editorial stated that “asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are routinely confused clinically in adults and can only be reliably distinguished with objective testing.”1 We did not mean to imply by this that objective testing is always successful in distinguishing asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Indeed, we agree with D'Urzo that there are many cases in which spirometry cannot separate the 2 conditions. However, there are many other cases in which asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be distinguished clearly and in such cases spirometry often provides the only objective means of doing so.

Because optimal treatments for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are often different, it is important to distinguish between these 2 conditions if at all possible. As with any other diagnostic test, spirometry alone does not make the diagnosis. Instead, the results of spirometry must be interpreted within their clinical context to establish or rule out a diagnosis. Therefore, further diagnostic testing is often needed, but this does not justify omitting spirometry nor does it remove the necessity of making a firm diagnosis whenever possible for our patients at some point during their chronic illness.

D'Urzo challenges our recommendation that spirometry should be mandatory in the management of asthma and instead suggests a strategy of treating first and testing later with methacholine challenge. Although we respect D'Urzo's point of view, we stand by our position. The proposed alternative strategy, although it would ensure that truly asthmatic patients were treated promptly, would result in many other patients being treated unnecessarily with medications that would not benefit them. Also, methacholine challenge is not ideal as an initial test because it cannot reliably distinguish asthma from other obstructive lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, it often produces false-positive results if done within 6 weeks of a viral respiratory tract infection, and it may produce false-negative results if a controller medication has already been initiated.2 Moreover, as methacholine challenge testing is even less available than spirometry, we fear that we would be advocating unattainable standards if our recommendations matched those of D'Urzo.

Given that spirometry can be administered at the point of care to confirm or rule out the presence of airflow obstruction reliably before a treatment decision is made, why not use it? Where barriers exist that challenge the feasibility of this approach, we must overcome them rather than succumb to them, to ensure that we provide our patients with the best care.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Stanbrook MB, Kaplan A. The error of not measuring asthma [editorial]. CMAJ 2008;179:1099-100.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing: 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:309-29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 4
17 Feb 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spirometry in primary care practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Spirometry in primary care practices
Matthew B. Stanbrook, Alan Kaplan
CMAJ Feb 2009, 180 (4) 430; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1090001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Spirometry in primary care practices
Matthew B. Stanbrook, Alan Kaplan
CMAJ Feb 2009, 180 (4) 430; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1090001
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire