Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Spirometry in primary care practices

Anthony D'Urzo
CMAJ February 17, 2009 180 (4) 429-430; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1080129
Anthony D'Urzo MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Matthew Stanbrook and Alan Kaplan recently discussed the merits and challenges of using office spirometry in primary care practices.1 Their theme was driven to a large extent by a CMAJ research paper by Aaron and colleagues,2 which reported that up to one-third of Canadian patients diagnosed as having asthma were misdiagnosed. The diagnosis of asthma in this study was confirmed in 16% of patients by postbronchodilator spirometry and in 72% of patients by bronchial challenge testing. Although I am able to appreciate Stanbrook and Kaplan's enthusiastic stand on this subject, I think they went too far in saying that “physicians who do not use spirometry for their asthma patients should not be managing asthma.”

Given the results of Aaron and colleagues, one is tempted to advise busy family physicians to treat suspected asthma initially on the basis of the patient's history and physical findings and refer the patient for methacholine challenge testing. Unfortunately, such a recommendation does not take into account some of the limitations of the study, including the authors' strategy to perform only a single reversibility (bronchodilator challenge) test at the first study visit.2 It is therefore not known whether more patients would have demonstrated an improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) by at least 15% and at least 200 mL after salbutamol challenge during the period in which their asthma medications were reduced. Such information would have helped us to understand more fully the diagnostic potential of this strategy. Furthermore, the study by Aaron and colleagues included patients with an established diagnosis of asthma so their findings cannot be generalized to patients who typically present to their family physician for the first time with chest-related complaints.

I respectfully disagree with Stanbrook and Kaplan that asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can be reliably distinguished with objective testing. The study they cite to support this notion used a reduction of the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) by less than 70% to establish a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.3 Although the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio provides important spirometric diagnostic information, it does not by itself confirm a specific clinical diagnosis because a reduced FEV1/FVC ratio after bronchodilator administration can be observed in both patients with asthma and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. To suggest otherwise may oversimplify the role of spirometry in clinical decision-making. The limitations of using reversibility to differentiate asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are known4 and were recently confirmed by the work of Tashkin and colleagues5 with a large cohort of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Although a normalization of the postbronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio rules out chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the data of Aaron and colleagues2 suggest that spirometry provides a much lower yield than methacholine challenge testing in terms of asthma diagnosis in treated patients.

My intuitive enthusiasm for spirometry use is dampened by the reality that there is a lack of strong evidence on how we might best use this simple and important test. The question of whether appropriate quality control of spirometry can be ensured at the primary care level requires further study. Until such data are available, we should beckon family physicians who are not yet regularly using spirometry with a more tempered call to task.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Stanbrook MB, Kaplan A. The error of not measuring asthma [editorial]. CMAJ 2008;179:1099-100.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Aaron SD, Vandenheen KL, Boulet LP, et al. Overdiagnosis of asthma in obese and nonobese adults. CMAJ 2008;179:1121-31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Tinkelman DG, Price DB, Nordyke RJ, et al. Misdiagnosis of COPD and asthma in primary care patients 40 years of age and over. J Asthma 2006;43:75-80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Kesten S, Rebuck AS. Is the short-term response to inhaled beta-adrenergic agonist sensitive or specific for distinguishing between asthma and COPD?Chest 1994;105:1042-5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Tashkin DP, Celli B, Decramer M, et al. Bronchodilator responses in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J 2008;31:742-50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 4
17 Feb 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Spirometry in primary care practices
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Spirometry in primary care practices
Anthony D'Urzo
CMAJ Feb 2009, 180 (4) 429-430; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080129

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Spirometry in primary care practices
Anthony D'Urzo
CMAJ Feb 2009, 180 (4) 429-430; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080129
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Les medecins de famille doivent-ils utiliser la spirometrie dans la prise en charge des patients asthmatiques?: NON
  • Refutation: Les medecins de famille doivent-ils utiliser la spirometrie dans la prise en charge despatients asthmatiques?: NON
  • Must family physicians use spirometry in managing asthma patients?: NO
  • Rebuttal: Must family physicians use spirometry in managing asthma patients?: NO
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire