Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Privatization of health care

Brian Dixon-Warren
CMAJ February 17, 2009 180 (4) 429; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1080122
Brian Dixon-Warren MB BS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Marcia Angell has made a very timely and important statement on the privatization of health care.1 There are only 2 objections that need to be addressed before they are raised by the proponents of private health care.

First, there is a strong argument that patients have the right to spend their disposable income as they choose and also that physicians have the right to choose their financial arrangements if they are in private practice. Clearly, the private system must not be allowed to undermine the public system. However, I believe that only a small minority of patients could afford to pay for private health care. Consequently, only a small number of physicians would be able to support themselves in private practice. Thus, this may well be a stable, self-regulating and acceptable arrangement. This needs to be researched.

Second, I am concerned that Angell's comparison of 2 very different systems may not be entirely valid. In the recent past the United States has been a much wealthier country than Canada, and, of course, it has a much larger population. These differences may make it difficult to make direct comparisons.

In Canada we have never had a definition of the “medically necessary care” mentioned in the Canada Health Act. When I was a medical student and a young physician in the 1950s and 1960s, the physician decided what care was medically necessary. With the welcome advent of medicare, the definition was increasingly set by the paying agency in negotiation with organized medicine. Now, with an increasing recognition of patient autonomy, the definition tends to be set by the patient. As a result, there has been lobbying by patients for public funding of alternative medicine and other additional services.

My opinion is that the current so-called fee-for-service system is broken and most of it should be discarded. In family medicine the capitation system has much to recommend it, with the addition of a fee schedule for a short list of specific services, such as night services and services that require procedural skills beyond the usual ones.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCE

  1. 1.↵
    Angell, M. Privatizing health care is not the answer: lessons from the United States. CMAJ 2008;179:916-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 4
17 Feb 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Privatization of health care
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Privatization of health care
Brian Dixon-Warren
CMAJ Feb 2009, 180 (4) 429; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080122

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Privatization of health care
Brian Dixon-Warren
CMAJ Feb 2009, 180 (4) 429; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080122
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCE
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Hospital-at-home programs in Canada: challenges and pitfalls
  • Author response to “Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider”
  • Pitfalls of analyzing perinatal outcomes by health care provider
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire