Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Research

Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation

Richard H. Glazier, Julie Klein-Geltink, Alexander Kopp and Lyn M. Sibley
CMAJ May 26, 2009 180 (11) E72-E81; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081316
Richard H. Glazier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julie Klein-Geltink
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander Kopp
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lyn M. Sibley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Primary care reform in Ontario, Canada, included the initiation of a blended capitation model in 2001–2002 and an enhanced fee-for-service model in 2003. Both models involve patient rostering, incentives for preventive care and requirements for after-hours care. We evaluated practice characteristics and patterns of care under both models.

Methods: Using administrative data, we identified physicians belonging to either the capitation or the enhanced fee-for-service group throughout the period from Sept. 1, 2005, to Aug. 31, 2006, and their enrolled patients. Practices were stratified by location (urban v. rural). We compared the groups in terms of practice characteristics and patterns of care, including comprehensiveness of care, continuity of care, after-hours care, visits to the emergency department and uptake of new patients.

Results: Patients in the capitation and enhanced fee-for-service practices had similar demographic characteristics. Patients in capitation practices had lower morbidity and comorbidity indices. Comprehensiveness and continuity of care were similar between the 2 groups. Compared with patients in enhanced fee-for-service practices, those in capitation practices had less after-hours care (adjusted rate ratio [RR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.75) and more visits to emergency departments (adjusted RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.15–1.25). Overall, physicians in the capitation group enrolled fewer new patients than did physicians in the enhanced fee-for-service group (37.0 v. 52.0 per physician); the same was true of new graduates (60.3 v. 72.1 per physician).

Interpretation: Physicians enrolled in the capitation model had different practice characteristics than those in the enhanced fee-for-service model. These characteristics appeared to be pre-existing and not due to enrolment in a new model. Although the capitation model provides an alternative to fee-for-service practice, its characteristics should be the focus of future policy development and research.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (11)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 11
26 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation
Richard H. Glazier, Julie Klein-Geltink, Alexander Kopp, Lyn M. Sibley
CMAJ May 2009, 180 (11) E72-E81; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081316

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Capitation and enhanced fee-for-service models for primary care reform: a population-based evaluation
Richard H. Glazier, Julie Klein-Geltink, Alexander Kopp, Lyn M. Sibley
CMAJ May 2009, 180 (11) E72-E81; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081316
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Interpretation
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Dans ce numéro
  • Highlights
  • Toward international primary care reform
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • The rationales for and challenges with employing arts-based health services research (ABHSR): a qualitative systematic review of primary studies
  • Multicomponent interventions for enhancing primary care: a systematic review
  • Effect of Access to After-Hours Primary Care on the Association Between Home Nursing Visits and Same-Day Emergency Department Use
  • Practice patterns among early-career primary care (ECPC) physicians and workforce planning implications: protocol for a mixed methods study
  • Primary care renewal strategies in Manitoba: Family physicians perceptions
  • Effect of primary health care reforms in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador: Interrupted time-series analysis
  • Impact of capitation on outpatient expenses among patients with diabetes mellitus in Tianjin, China: a natural experiment
  • The primary care and other health system use of home care patients: a retrospective cohort analysis
  • Aligning innovations in health funding with innovations in care
  • Association versus causation
  • Computer use in primary care practices in Canada
  • Toward evidence-based policy
  • A population-based analysis of incentive payments to primary care physicians for the care of patients with complex disease
  • Performance of an integrated network model: Evaluation of the first 4 years
  • Do new and traditional models of primary care differ with regard to access?: Canadian QUALICOPC study
  • Effect of physician specialist alternative payment plans on administrative health data in Calgary: a validation study
  • The association of hospital prevention processes and patient risk factors with the risk of Clostridium difficile infection: a population-based cohort study
  • Incident atrial fibrillation in the emergency department in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study of follow-up care
  • Using physician-linked mailed invitations in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme: effectiveness and factors associated with response
  • Patient-reported access to primary care in Ontario: Effect of organizational characteristics
  • Characteristics of primary care practices associated with high quality of care
  • The effect of socioeconomic status on access to primary care: an audit study
  • Does better access to FPs decrease the likelihood of emergency department use?: Results from the Primary Care Access Survey
  • Practice and payment preferences of newly practising family physicians in British Columbia
  • Implementation of electronic medical records: Effect on the provision of preventive services in a pay-for-performance environment
  • Progress of Ontario's Family Health Team Model: A Patient-Centered Medical Home
  • Patients' perceptions of the quality of care after primary care reform: Family medicine groups in Quebec
  • Toward international primary care reform
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The risk of death or unplanned readmission after discharge from a COVID-19 hospitalization in Alberta and Ontario
  • The link between medical conditions and fatal drownings in Canada: a 10-year cross-sectional analysis
  • Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2022
Show more Research

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Health policy
    • Medical careers

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire