Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Salon

Coping with public health 2.0

Kumanan Wilson and Jennifer Keelan
CMAJ May 12, 2009 180 (10) 1080; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090696
Kumanan Wilson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Keelan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The scope of the Web today is hard to fathom. … In fewer than 4000 days, we have encoded half a trillion versions of our collective story and put them in front of 1 billion people, or one-sixth of the world’s population. … What we all failed to see was how much of this new world would be manufactured by users, not corporate interests.” 1

This statement by the founding editor of Wired reflects 2 interrelated phenomena of the Internet: the rapidity of its growth and the amount of information produced by users for free. It is the latter fact, that is at the heart of the second generation of Web services: Web 2.0. These services fuel an individual’s desire to connect with others and communicate their views, and allow online collaboration and sharing of content. Web 2.0 applications have grown dramatically in number, size, popularity and influence to include sites such as Wikipedia, YouTube, political blogs such as Daily-Kos and HuffingtonPost and the social networking sites MySpace and Facebook.

Web 2.0 facilitates both expert and general public communication of health-related knowledge, which can be particularly problematic for public health authorities. De facto, it juxtaposes vetted scientific opinion against information from critics, crusaders and conspiracy theorists, which undermines the critical foundation of trust between public health officials and the public. 2 This trust is necessary for activities that sometimes require restrictions on individual liberties or impositions on individuals for the benefits of the population.

Antivaccination postings illustrate some of the challenges of this new medium. The usual public health response to concerns about vaccination has been to disseminate well-researched evidence that refutes the claims. To an important extent public health officials have also tried to not bring too much attention to claims made by vaccine critics because of fear that a public debate and subsequent airing of those views, regardless of scientific merit, might lend credence to the claims. However, with the Internet and Web 2.0 these strategies are no longer appropriate. YouTube is now being used by a community of individuals concerned about vaccination to communicate their messages. 3 MySpace blogs contain a significant number of posts with antivaccination content. Anti-vaccination viewpoints linking autism to mercury are also being posted on popular blogs such as the HuffingtonPost. By leveraging these new media, vaccine critics have overcome the structural advantage held by traditional public health in communicating their viewpoints. The consideration of public figures, such as actress-activist Jenny McCarthy, as equivalent an authority, in some media, to top public health officials, and the infiltration of the language and logic of vaccine critics into political discourse is a testament to their success. 4

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

FIGURE. Image courtesy of Fred Sebastian

The use of Web 2.0 reflects an evolution in medical counterculture movements. Individuals with beliefs outside the mainstream used to have difficulty finding likeminded individuals. But when they did, their ability to hold onto their viewpoints and reject criticism was strengthened. Now, Web 2.0 provides those with alternative beliefs a virtual environment where they can hear their viewpoints echoed and become more confident that their assertions are correct. This interaction also has the potential to sway others.

Although troubling to many in public health, the use of the Internet for these purposes simply cannot be ignored. Web 2.0 is here to stay and will almost certainly influence health behaviours. Health is a logical area in which individuals will want to seek opinions from others and communicate their experiences. In this new era, public health officials need to learn how to more effectively listen to these messages and, simultaneously, develop more lively and engaging messages themselves to communicate with the public.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

FIGURE. No caption available.

Footnotes

  • Dr. Wilson is supported by the Canada Research Chair in public health policy.

    Have you got an opinion about this article? Post your views at www.cmaj.ca. Potential Salon contributors are welcome to send a query to salon{at}cmaj.ca

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Kelly K. We are the Web. Wired 2005;13(8). Available: www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.08/tech.html?pg=2& (accessed 2009 Apr. 17).
  2. 2.↵
    Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL, et al. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the In-ternet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first health information national trends survey. Arch Intern Med 2005;165:2618-24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Keelan J, Pavri-Garcia V, Tomlinson G, et al. YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis. JAMA 2007;298:2482-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Carey B. Into the fray over the cause of autism. New York Times 2008 Mar. 4. Available: www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/us/politics/04autism.html (accessed 2009 Apr. 17).
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 10
12 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Coping with public health 2.0
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Coping with public health 2.0
Kumanan Wilson, Jennifer Keelan
CMAJ May 2009, 180 (10) 1080; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090696

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Coping with public health 2.0
Kumanan Wilson, Jennifer Keelan
CMAJ May 2009, 180 (10) 1080; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090696
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Related Content
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Public scholarship and the role for injury practitioners
  • Embrace, don't cope
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
  • Revisiting Rodriguez
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire