Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Humanities

Nip/Tuck well past its best before

David McDonald
CMAJ May 12, 2009 180 (10) 1039-1040; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090686
David McDonald
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Here we go again. More extreme comedy about mastopexy, ble-pharoplasty and rhytidectomy, about those who perform them and those upon whom they are performed.

In the resolution of a midseason cliffhanger, plastic surgeon Sean Mc-Namara (Dylan Walsh) operates on his daughter, Annie (Kelsey Lynn Batelaan), in his private clinic. Annie is recovering from injuries suffered in a paparazzi-induced car crash, which also injured Sean’s partner, hunky lothario Dr. Christian Troy (Julian McMahon). Cue the O’Jays’ soul classic Back Stabber: “They smile in your face …” Unbeknownst to Sean, he is being stalked by the deranged Colleen Rose (Sharon Gless, formerly Cagney or Lacey), a bogus talent agent and teddy-bear fetishist, who represented him when he had a role in a TV series called Hearts & Scalpels.

“All the time they want to take your place.” Colleen sneaks into the operating room brandishing a giant blade apparently on loan from Halloween ’s Jason Voorhees. “The back stabbers ….” She plunges the knife into Sean and drags him into a supply closet. Christian arrives just in time to save a flat-lining Annie. Sean, meanwhile, turns the tables on Colleen, wresting the knife from her and inflicting a fatal wound. Christian reaches his dying partner in the nick of time. Just another working day at McNamara/Troy, the swish Beverly Hills 90210 nip/tuck shop. Fade to black.

“You can’t have your celebrities and eat them, too.”

And that, if you’re scoring at home, is just the first act of episode 1, season 5, part 2 of the durable Emmy- and Golden Globe-winning prime-time soap Nip/Tuck, as it ran on Citytv in early March. The series is the creation of former newspaper and Entertainment Weekly reporter Ryan Murphy and the product of the US cable network FX, where it premiered in 2003 with the meaty catchphrase, “So, tell me what you don’t like about yourself.” The answer, of course, is invariably some physical defect, real or imagined that can be remedied, for a price. As the profoundly shallow Christian tells a gorgeous, thirtyish former lover, whom he’s trying to talk into having cosmetic surgery: “When you stop striving for perfection, you might as well be dead.”

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

FIGURE. Colleagues Liz Cruz (Roma Maffia) and Christian Troy (Julian McMahon) get unexpectedly steamy this season. Image courtesy of Michael Becker / FX

Partly, Nip/Tuck is an unblinking and, to the layman at least, medically correct effort. (The production boasts a medical adviser, several consulting plastic surgeons and the most convincing depictions of surgery this side of the Discovery Channel.) And in probing the tangled personal lives of Drs. McNamara and Troy, the show is also anatomically and vernacularly correct. Free from the puritanical constraints of US network television, Nip/Tuck injects the traditional medical drama with previously unimaginable doses of raunchiness — profanity, nudity, simulated sex and downright gore. At the same time, it gleefully plays with every bit of proscribed behaviour from murder to cannibalism.

At its best, the show is a dark, titillating and scalpel-sharp satire on the (North) American obsession with youth, beauty, sex, money, power and celebrity. Over its first couple of seasons, not surprisingly, it became a pleasure, guilty or otherwise, among the less squeamish of those viewers grown bored with conventional network doctor dramas, or never much into them in the first place. Doogie Howser, M.D. it isn’t.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

FIGURE. TV plastic surgeons Christian Troy (Julian McMahon), left, and Sean McNamera (Dylan Walsh) ponder the meaning of lift. Image courtesy of Prashant Gupta / FX

But the very ingredients that gave early Nip/Tuck such a refreshing jolt also carried the seeds of its future decline. First, there are only so many taboos to trot out, only so many ways to titillate the hip and épater les bourgeois, before audiences begin to experience an overall numbness. Serial killing, incest, bestiality, self-mutilation — been there, seen that. Ho-hum.

For a show with pretensions to satire, Nip/Tuck also displays a rather cynical dependence on the very commodity it purports to mock. From the beginning, the show has twisted itself in knots trying to write parts for a long line of guests stars clamoring to appear in on the joke — Madonna, Rosie, Nicole, Alanis, Brooke, Morgan Fairchild, Sandra Bullock, Catherine Deneuve, even Richard Chamberlain and Larry Hagman. Celebrities may juice ratings, but the metafictional baggage they carry often overwhelms the roles they’re supposed to be playing. (Hey, isn’t that Portia de Rossi, who just got married to talk-show host Ellen DeGeneres, playing the evil lesbian lover of Joely Richardson, whose mother, Vanessa Redgrave, was also a guest star on the show and whose sister Natasha just died in a skiing accident at Mont Tremblant, Quebec?) There are only so many of these tabloid regulars you can accommodate in a show without defanging it entirely. You can’t have your celebrities and eat them, too.

But there’s an even more serious malady that’s infected the show over the past couple of seasons. To sustain, over the long haul, a drama or comedy — or, as in this case, some Grand Guignol coupling of the 2 — it’s character that must drive the story lines, not the reverse. But even Nip/Tuck’s principals, the ones we look to for some consistency each week, have been subjected to so many arbitrary nips/tucks that their actions now seem about as natural as a smile on the overly ratcheted face of another former guest star, Joan Rivers.

This season, for instance, the Nip/Tuck brain trust, in a desperate attempt to keep the old autoclave steaming, asks us to buy into an out-of-left-field, altar-bound romance between inveterate womanizer Christian and the firm’s dowdy, middle-aged lesbian anesthesiologist, Liz Cruz (Roma Maffia). It’s a development that seems about as plausible as Seinfeld’s George Costanza suddenly decamping for Africa to work with lepers. Add to that is the fact that the callous and misogynistic Christian is now, himself, suffering from — oh, the irony! — stage 2 breast cancer. Sacrificing character and credibility for ungrounded melodrama is a fatal error for any series, even one as unabashedly over-the-top as this. Despite consistently engaging lead performances, sharp direction, and some smartly written scenes, Nip/Tuck has long since toppled off its gurney.

Footnotes

  • Mr. McDonald’s most recent documentary, Cereal Thriller, about the unintended consequences of a 1955 cereal-box promotion, premiered on History Television. He is currently working on a book on the same flaky topic.

    Nip/Tuck creator Ryan Murphy has also written and directed several feature films, including Running With Scissors, starring Annette Bening, Alec Baldwin and Gwyneth Paltrow. He currently has several films in development, including a “plastic surgery thriller,”Face, starring Demi Moore. Murphy’s next TV project is Glee, a musical comedy series for the Fox Network. A preview episode airs May 19.

    The Nip/Tuck official website (www.fxnetworks.com/shows/originals/niptuck/) has a feature called “Skin Deep Consultation,” where visitors are invited to “select the procedure they think they need and submit their photo for an online consultation. The Nip/Tuck community will evaluate it and give their opinion.” Submissions seem about equally split between very average-looking young (mostly) women, apparently seeking either a nose job or a “full-body makeover” and buff, outwardly attractive young people of both sexes.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 180 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 180, Issue 10
12 May 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nip/Tuck well past its best before
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Nip/Tuck well past its best before
David McDonald
CMAJ May 2009, 180 (10) 1039-1040; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090686

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Nip/Tuck well past its best before
David McDonald
CMAJ May 2009, 180 (10) 1039-1040; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.090686
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • “Patients deserve agency when it comes to their body”: a patient’s experience with endometriosis
  • Notes in still
  • Colonial tuberculosis legacies and the Dynevor Indian Hospital (1908–1934)
Show more Humanities

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire