Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Physicians & Subscribers
    • Benefits for Canadian physicians
    • CPD Credits for CMA Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
  • Listen to CMAJ podcasts
News

Switching swine for simulators: At what cost?

Roger Collier
CMAJ October 07, 2008 179 (8) 759-760; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081400
Roger Collier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
Submit a Response to This Article
Compose Response

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
References
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. [email protected]
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'. Minimum 7 characters.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'. Minimum 12 characters.
Your organization, institution's or residential address.
Statement of Competing Interests

Vertical Tabs

Jump to comment:

  • Sarah Keating, M.D.
    Posted on: 20 October 2008
  • Response to: Switching Swine for Simulators.
    Daran W. Haber
    Posted on: 20 October 2008
  • Posted on: (20 October 2008)
    Page navigation anchor for
    • Sarah Keating, M.D.
    To the Editor: CMAJ recently published an article on the putative educational and economic costs of replacing live animals used in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training with human patient simulators.1 Replacing live animals with high-tech simulators does not compromise the quality of the courses but instead creates a safe learning environment and provides a realistic representation of human anatomy. Seven years ago, t...
    Show More
    To the Editor: CMAJ recently published an article on the putative educational and economic costs of replacing live animals used in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training with human patient simulators.1 Replacing live animals with high-tech simulators does not compromise the quality of the courses but instead creates a safe learning environment and provides a realistic representation of human anatomy. Seven years ago, the American College of Surgeons, which oversees ATLS courses, approved the use of simulators for all procedures taught in the courses. A recent review paper by that organization details its initiatives in changing the focus in surgery skills training from the use of animals to the use of simulation.2 Today, the vast majority of ATLS courses use only nonanimal training tools. The few trauma training programs that still use live animals are continuing an outdated tradition. Nonanimal alternatives are now widely available and are also affordable. They can be leased for various lengths of time to fit the needs of individual courses, with costs as low as $100 to $150 per student--similar to the cost of using live animals. Switching to simulators does not create a financial burden for institutions offering ATLS courses. Teaching methods and technology are constantly evolving and improving, and it is time for the few ATLS courses that still use live animals to join the 21st century and make the switch to simulators. Sincerely, Sarah Keating, M.D. REFERENCES 1. Collier R. Switching swine for simulators: At what cost? CMAJ 2008;179(8): 759-60. 2. Sachdeva AK, Pellegrini CA, Johnson KA. Support for Simulation-based Surgical Education through American College of Surgeons–Accredited Education Institutes. World J Surg 2008;32:196–207.

    Conflict of Interest:

    None declared

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
  • Posted on: (20 October 2008)
    Page navigation anchor for Response to: Switching Swine for Simulators.
    Response to: Switching Swine for Simulators.
    • Daran W. Haber

    To the Editor:

    The shift toward using human patient simulators in place of live animals in trauma training was recently discussed in CMAJ.1 As a former participant in an Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course and instructor for Advanced Cardiac Life Support, I strongly support using simulators in trauma training courses to ensure participants have an accurate understanding of human anatomy.

    Signif...

    Show More

    To the Editor:

    The shift toward using human patient simulators in place of live animals in trauma training was recently discussed in CMAJ.1 As a former participant in an Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course and instructor for Advanced Cardiac Life Support, I strongly support using simulators in trauma training courses to ensure participants have an accurate understanding of human anatomy.

    Significant differences exist between a human’s anatomy and a pig’s anatomy. The tracheas--important because airway management is a crucial part of ATLS courses--are very different, the required incision pressure is different, and in many other ways the physiology of a pig is irrelevant to medical personnel trying to save human lives.

    With cutting-edge human patient simulators, there is no translation required from animal anatomy to human anatomy. Simulators are affordable, readily available, and have been approved by the American College of Surgeons. TraumaMan is an anatomical human body mannequin designed specifically for students to practice the advanced surgical procedures taught in the ATLS course. In a 2002 study, ATLS course participants found TraumaMan to be superior to animal models for learning many skills and procedures.

    It is crucial that ATLS course participants are trained with the best tools and methods available, and this means replacing live animal labs with high-tech human patient simulators. This advancement will allow medical professionals to hone their emergency trauma skills without sacrificing animals’ lives.

    Sincerely,

    Daran Haber, M.D. Riverview Medical Center 1 Riverview Plaza Red Bank, NJ 07701 (877) 767-8910 [email protected]

    REFERENCES 1. Collier R. Switching swine for simulators: At what cost? CMAJ 2008; 179(8): 759-60. 2. Block EF, Lottenberg L, Flint L, Jakobsen J, Liebnitzky D. Use of a human patient simulator for the advanced trauma life support course. Am. Surg 2002 Jul; 68(7):

    Show Less
    Competing Interests: None declared.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 179 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 179, Issue 8
7 Oct 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Switching swine for simulators: At what cost?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Switching swine for simulators: At what cost?
Roger Collier
CMAJ Oct 2008, 179 (8) 759-760; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081400

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Switching swine for simulators: At what cost?
Roger Collier
CMAJ Oct 2008, 179 (8) 759-760; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081400
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Saying goodbye to CMAJ News
  • National survey highlights worsening primary care access
  • How Canadian hospitals are decreasing carbon emissions
Show more News

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Medical careers
    • Medical education, residency, internship

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: [email protected]

CMA Civility, Accessibility, Privacy

 

Powered by HighWire