Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
    • Obituary notices
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
    • Avis de décès
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

Listeriosis is the least of it

Amir Attaran, Noni MacDonald, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Barbara Sibbald, Ken Flegel, Rajendra Kale and Paul C. Hébert
CMAJ October 07, 2008 179 (8) 739-740; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081477
Amir Attaran LLB DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Noni MacDonald MD MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew B. Stanbrook MD PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Sibbald BJ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ken Flegel MDCM MSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rajendra Kale MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul C. Hébert MD MHSc
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

In August, Canada experienced the worst epidemic of listeriosis in the world. Contaminated cold cuts from a Toronto meat processing plant have, as of Sept. 12, 2008, killed at least 16 Canadians from among 43 confirmed cases of listeriosis in half the country's provinces. Already the death toll is more than double that of the notorious Escherichia coli outbreak in Walkerton, Ontario. And since Listeria monocytogenes can remain latent for 2 to 3 months, the deaths, illnesses and other effects such as spontaneous abortions may not be over yet.

What went wrong? As in the Walkerton and SARS epidemics, an outbreak of this size may point to systemic failures across multiple levels. Listeria is the biological agent, cold cuts the vector, but the ultimate cause may be found in risky government decisions.

Last November the Canadian government instituted a strategic review of the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA). Among its outcomes was to transfer inspection duties for ready-to-eat meats from the government inspectors to the meat industry. Cabinet decided to “shift from full-time CFIA meat inspection presence to an oversight role, [thereby] allowing industry to implement food safety control programs and to manage key risks.”1

In practice, the new policy meant that CFIA inspectors would rarely enter meat plants to test for bacteria and testing was left mostly to companies. Self-inspection came largely to substitute for, and not just to supplement, government inspection. Self-inspection mechanisms have worked effectively in other countries, but in Canada something went very wrong. One troubling sign is that even now, months after the policy change, the CFIA's required sampling procedure remains under development.

Maple Leaf Foods, the company at whose plant the Listeria contamination originated, was an early adopter of the government's new plan. And why not? The new policy made self-inspection easy: the company had to keep up good manufacturing practices in its plant and to test finished products just once monthly.2

Canada's government also left national standards for Listeria lower than in many other countries. Health Canada tolerates up to 100 Listeria bacteria per gram of ready-to-eat foods at the start of the product's life, even though the dose of Listeria ultimately ingested may be higher because the bacteria can replicate during the product's life even if refrigerated.3 In contrast, the United Nations / World Health Organization Codex Alimentarius Commission grudgingly tolerates 100 bacteria per gram, but only at the end of the product's life.4 The United States government is tougher still and tolerates no Listeria bacteria at all.5

Confronted with the reality of its lax Listeria standards, Canada's government did not raise them, but instead lobbied to have America's standards lowered.2 In particular, CFIA opposed “daily visits” by inspectors and “finished product testing for Listeria,” precisely the safeguards that might have spotted Maple Leaf Foods' Listeria problem sooner and avoided or reduced the impact of this outbreak.6

Government policy errors helped bring about this epidemic. Yet surprisingly, government has taken no remedial steps beyond issuing a food recall. Instead, officials praise the success of our infectious disease surveillance system — as if, with 16 dead, there were cause to celebrate — while food safety standards remain as low as ever.

The listeriosis epidemic is a timely reminder that the Harper government has reversed much of the progress that previous governments made on governing for public health. Following the 2003 SARS epidemic and subsequent recommendations of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health,7 the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) was created and given its own minister in government — a direct line to the prime minister. But in 2006, among Prime Minister Stephen Harper's first acts was to eliminate the PHAC minister and public health's seat at the Cabinet table. His government also left the chief medical officer of health within the ranks of the civil service, working under the minister of health. In so doing, it left our country without a national independent voice to speak out on public health issues, including providing visible leadership during this crisis.

And listeriosis may be the least of it. The same November 2007 Cabinet decision that handed self-inspection to the owners of meat plants did the same for operators of animal feed mills and cut back the avian influenza preparedness program. Yet bad animal feed led to the epidemic of bovine spongiform encephalitis (mad cow disease), and in an influenza pandemic tens of thousands of Canadians may die.8 Listeriosis pales in comparison. Overall, it would seem that, as a country, Canada is far less prepared now for epidemics than in the past.

To address the increasingly serious public health problem, just 1 day before heading into an election, Prime Minister Harper called for an “independent investigation” of the listeriosis epidemic. But the structure of the proposed investigation is deeply disappointing. According to the investigation's terms of reference, listed on the prime minister's website, no investigator at arm's length from the government has been or will be chosen; the investigator will not have any power to subpoena witnesses or documents; the investigation will be closed to public participation; and there is no commitment to publish the investigator's findings or to report to Parliament.9

Such an investigation will be inferior to every epidemic inquiry in recent Canadian history. The inquiries into the tainted blood scandal, the Walkerton outbreak and the SARS epidemic all were arm's-length exercises convened by an independent commissioner (usually a judge) who held open and public hearings and who wielded all the powers listed above. The public reports of those past inquiries catalogued the institutional failures that caused the epidemics and made sensible governance and medical recommendations to protect Canadians better. The Krever commission of inquiry into the tainted blood scandal, for example, has as its legacy the creation of one of the best blood collection and banking systems in the world.10

Prime Minister Harper has said he is “very troubled” by the Listeria outbreak. So are we: Listeria is a ubiquitous soil bacterium. Future food-borne epidemics of listeriosis are certain. A full-scale public inquiry into the major failings of Canada's food inspection system is necessary to protect Canadians from future epidemic threats, and the Canadian public should settle for nothing less than that. This will be the first and most important step toward making our food chain safer. Politicians would do well to explain their positions on such an inquiry before election day.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/misc/edboard.shtml

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Treasury Board. Decision of the Treasury Board — meeting of November 13, 2007. T.B. 834007. Ottawa (ON): The Board; 2008. Available [Globe and Mail website]: www.theglobeandmail.com/v5/content/pdf/cfiamemo.pdf (accessed 2008 Sept 12).
  2. 2.↵
    Ha TT, Curry B, McIlroy A. Inspectors failed to adopt more rigorous US measures. Globe and Mail [Toronto] 2008 Aug 27. Available: www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080827.wmeat27/BNStory/National/home (accessed 2008 Sept 12).
  3. 3.↵
    Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada. Policy on Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods. Ottawa (ON): Health Canada; 2004. Available: www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/alt_formats/hpfb-dgpsa/pdf/legislation/policy_listeria_monocytogenes_politique_toc-eng.pdf (accessed 2008 Sept 3).
  4. 4.↵
    European Food Safety Authority. Request for updating the former SCVPH opinion on Listeria monocytogenes risk related to ready-to-eat foods and scientific advice on different levels of Listeria monocytogenes in ready-to-eat foods and the related risk for human illness. Scientific opinion of the Panel on Biological Hazards. EFSA Journal 2007;599:1-42. Available: www.efsa.europa.eu/cs/BlobServer/Scientific_Opinion/biohaz_op_ej599_listeria_en,3.pdf?ssbinary=true (accessed 2008 Sept 3).
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    United States DHHS Food and Drug Administration's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (FDA/CFSAN). Quantitative assessment of relative risk to public health from foodborne Listeria monocytogenes among selected categories of ready-to-eat foods. Rockville (MD): The Administration; 2003. Available: www.foodsafety.gov/~dms/lmr2-1.html (accessed 2008 Sept 12).
  6. 6.↵
    Curry B. Ottawa wanted US to accept more lenient meat inspection regime. Globe and Mail [Toronto] 2008 Aug 12.
  7. 7.↵
    Health Canada. Learning from SARS: renewal of public health in Canada: a report of the National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health October 2003. Ottawa (ON): Public Health Agency of Canada; 2003. Available: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/sars-sras/pdf/sars-e.pdf (accessed 2008 Sept 12).
  8. 8.↵
    Public Health Agency of Canada. The Canadian pandemic influenza plan for the health sector. Ottawa (ON): The Agency; 2006. Available: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/cpip-pclcpi/s02-eng.php#23 (accessed 2008 Sept 12).
  9. 9.↵
    Prime minister announces terms of reference for an independent investigation of the listeriosis outbreak [news release]. Ottawa (ON): Office of the Prime Minister of Canada; 2008 Sept 6. Available: http://pm.gc.ca/eng/media.asp?category=1&id=2268.
  10. 10.↵
    Wilson K. The Krever Commission — 10 years later. CMAJ 2007;177:1387-9.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 179 (8)
CMAJ
Vol. 179, Issue 8
7 Oct 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Listeriosis is the least of it
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Listeriosis is the least of it
Amir Attaran, Noni MacDonald, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Barbara Sibbald, Ken Flegel, Rajendra Kale, Paul C. Hébert
CMAJ Oct 2008, 179 (8) 739-740; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081477

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Listeriosis is the least of it
Amir Attaran, Noni MacDonald, Matthew B. Stanbrook, Barbara Sibbald, Ken Flegel, Rajendra Kale, Paul C. Hébert
CMAJ Oct 2008, 179 (8) 739-740; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081477
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • One Health and the food chain: maintaining safety in a globalised industry
  • Food in Canada: Eat at your own risk
  • Food safety during pregnancy
  • Listeriosis in pregnancy: Survey of British Columbia practitioners' knowledge of risk factors, counseling practices, and learning needs
  • Not the view of Canadian Medical Association
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Le sujet de l’heure : l’accès aux soins de santé au Canada
  • Integration of midwifery care in Canada
  • CMAJ’s new guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in research articles
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Infectious diseases
    • Public health

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire