Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Articles & podcasts
    • Blog posts
    • Collection
    • News
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
    • Career Ad Discount
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2021
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Commentary

Statins and postoperative delirium

Edward R. Marcantonio
CMAJ September 23, 2008 179 (7) 627-628; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081101
Edward R. Marcantonio MD SM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

Delirium (acute confusional state) may be the most common postoperative complication in elderly people. It is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality and cost.1 Two decades ago, the prevalent belief was that it was normal for older patients to be a “bit confused” after surgery. Now, delirium is recognized as an important complication that should be prevented, or promptly recognized, evaluated and treated. Using current evidence, clinicians can identify patients at risk for postoperative delirium (Box 1),2 address modifiable risk factors3–5 and implement intervention strategies to prevent or reduce delirium.6,7 Effective strategies include geriatric consultation, which reduces the incidence of delirium by over one-third after hip-fracture repair,6 and prophylactic low-dose haloperidol, which reduces the severity and duration of delirium after high-risk hip surgery.7

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Box 1.

The development and dissemination of techniques to validly and reliably diagnose delirium, such as the Confusion Assessment Method,8 have been central to progress in delirium research. This method assesses 4 key features of delirium, the diagnosis of which requires the presence an acute change in mental status with a fluctuating course and inattention, with either disorganized thinking or an altered level of consciousness. The Confusion Assessment Method diagnostic algorithm, which is used with a short, standardized mental status examination, can be completed in 15–20 minutes by trained, nonclinician interviewers. This algorithm has 90%–95% sensitivity and specificity relative to a “gold-standard” assessment by a geriatrician or geriatric psychiatrist.8 The Confusion Assessment Method has become widely adopted in delirium research and clinical practice.

In this issue of CMAJ, Redelmeier and colleagues report a significant association between the perioperative use of statins and postoperative delirium (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.15–1.47).9 They performed a large-scale pharmacoepidemiology study using the Canadian Institutes for Health Information database. They identified 284 158 patients aged 65 years or older admitted to the hospital for elective surgery in Ontario from 1992–2002. Drug exposures to statins and other classes of drugs were identified using a population-wide prescription database. The authors identified cases of delirium using hospital discharge abstracts (International Classification of Disease, ninth revision [ICD-9] codes 293.0–293.9).

A general rule of epidemiology is that a study is only as good as its principal outcome measure. The outcome measure for delirium used by Redelmeier and colleagues has serious limitations. The authors cite a study that coding of delirium in the discharge abstract has a sensitivity of 35% and a specificity of 98%10 compared with the gold standard of medical record review. However, studies that have compared medical record reviews to direct patient interviews have demonstrated that only 10%–50% of delirium cases are documented in the medical record.11 Given the loss of sensitivity from both medical record reviews and discharge abstract coding, it is probable that less than 10% of delirium cases were identified in this study. This explains the discrepancy between the 1.1% delirium rate reported and the 15%–25% delirium rate after elective surgery reported using validated methods for primary data collection.2

The authors present a series of analyses to strengthen their argument that the use of statins increases the risk of postoperative delirium. First, they correctly argue that coding of delirium in the discharge abstract, although not sensitive, is probably highly specific; that is, there are few “false positives.” They present 2 approaches commonly used in pharmacoepidemiology: a dose–response analysis showing that the risk of delirium increases with increasing doses of statin, and a drug-withdrawal analysis showing that patients previously prescribed a statin but no longer taking it at the time of surgery were not at increased risk.

Atherosclerosis has emerged as a major risk factor for delirium,12 and statins are used to treat patients with atherosclerosis. The authors address this potential “confounding by indication” by use of stratification (exclusion of patients with major vascular disorders), statistical adjustment and propensity score matching. In each case, delirium remained associated with the use of statins, though the adjustor variables also came from the discharge abstracts and are limited. The authors examined a long list of other cardiac medications, vascular medications and miscellaneous medications, and they found no other associations with delirium. A much shorter list of neuropsychiatric medications shows the expected associations with delirium. All of these analyses strengthen the authors' argument.

The assessment of causality requires a biological mechanism. Beyond their direct effect on lipids, statins have direct effects on microvascular tone, which may be mediated through the expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. The authors suggest that this direct effect, which may be beneficial in the prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke, may shunt blood away from neurons postoperatively. This shunting of blood may lead to ischemia, which in turn may predispose patients to delirium. Inadequate cerebral oxygenation is one of the current models of pathophysiology for delirium. Thus, the authors' theory is plausible.

In the face of these strengths and weaknesses, how does one judge the value of this article and its implications for clinical practice? Clinical investigations are conducted on a continuum: some studies are better designed to generate hypotheses and others are better designed to test them. The study by Redelmeier and colleagues represents a valuable addition to the literature. It proposes and eloquently defends an association between statins and postoperative delirium. However, the low detection of the primary outcome increases the risk of unmeasured confounding and bias that cannot be fully addressed by even the excellent methods employed. For example, if delirium were under-coded by as little as 3% among patients not using statins compared with those using statins, this could account for the authors' findings. Therefore, I believe the association between statins and delirium requires confirmation in studies using rigorous, state-of-the-art methods developed for the assessment and diagnosis of delirium.

What is the clinician to do right now? Unlike the authors, I believe it is premature to recommend stopping the use of statins in elderly surgical patients. The methodology used in this study is simply too limited to compel practice change. Moreover, we do not know the effects of stopping statins on other perioperative outcomes. Finally, in our increasingly fragmented health care system, there is the risk that the statins would not be restarted after surgery, leading to long-term harm to patients. Despite these caveats, I believe that the study by Redelmeier and colleagues presents a compelling argument to further explore the association between statins and postoperative delirium. Given the increasing age of the surgical population and the prevalence, morbidity, and cost of postoperative delirium, even a modest risk reduction would translate to substantial benefit for patients and the health care system.

@@ See related research paper by Redelmeier and colleagues, page 645

    Key points

  • Delirium is a common, morbid and costly complication of elective surgery in elderly patients.

  • Delirium is associated with a number of reversible factors. Correcting these factors may reduce the incidence of delirium.

  • Use of statins during the perioperative period may increase the risk of postoperative delirium by about 30%.

  • The methods used in the study by Redelmeier and colleagues underestimate the true incidence of delirium.

  • The association between the use of statins and delirium requires confirmation using other methods.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Inouye SK. Current concepts: delirium in older persons. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1157-65.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Mangione CM, et al. A clinical prediction rule for delirium after elective non-cardiac surgery. JAMA 1994;271:134-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Marcantonio ER, Juarez G, Goldman L, et al. The relationship of postoperative delirium with psychoactive medications. JAMA 1994;272:1518-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    Lynch EP, Lazor MA, Gellis JE, et al. The impact of postoperative pain on the development of postoperative delirium. Anesth Analg 1998;86:781-5.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Marcantonio ER, Goldman L, Orav EJ, et al. The association of intraoperative factors with the development of postoperative delirium. Am J Med 1998;105:380-4.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Marcantonio ER, Flacker JM, Wright JR, et al. Reducing delirium after hip fracture: a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:516-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Kalisvaart KJ, de Jonghe JFM, Bogaards MJ, et al. Haloperidol prophylaxis for elderly hip surgery patients at risk for delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:1658-66.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, et al. Clarifying confusion: the Confusion Assessment Method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990;113:941-8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Redelmeier DA, Thiruchelvam D, Daneman N. Delirium after elective surgery among elderly patients taking statins. CMAJ. 2008;179:645-52.
  10. 10.↵
    Romano PS, Chan BK, Schembri ME, et al. Can administrative data be used to compare postoperative complication rates across hospitals? Med Care 2002;40:856-67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Johnson JC, Kerse NM, Gottlieb G, et al. Prospective versus retrospective methods of identifying patients with delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40:316-9.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Rudolph JL, Jones RN, Rasmussen LS, et al. Independent vascular and cognitive risk factors for postoperative delirium. Am J Med 2007;120:807-13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 179 (7)
CMAJ
Vol. 179, Issue 7
23 Sep 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Statins and postoperative delirium
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Statins and postoperative delirium
Edward R. Marcantonio
CMAJ Sep 2008, 179 (7) 627-628; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081101

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Statins and postoperative delirium
Edward R. Marcantonio
CMAJ Sep 2008, 179 (7) 627-628; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081101
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Highlights
  • Dans ce numéro
  • Delirium after elective surgery among elderly patients taking statins
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Canada’s provinces and territories should disclose cannabis data to support research
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding and the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: an ethics-based framework for shared decision-making
  • The case for relaxing no-visitor policies in hospitals during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Drugs: cardiovascular system
    • Drugs: adverse reactions
    • Cognitive impairment (not dementia)

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions

Copyright 2021, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of the resources on this site in an accessible format, please contact us at cmajgroup@cmaj.ca.

Powered by HighWire