Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
    • Obituary notices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Salon

“When I'm 64”

Tom Koch
CMAJ August 12, 2008 179 (4) 388; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.081090
Tom Koch PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Why has longevity become a source of dismay rather than a cause for celebration? How did we turn the greatest triumph of 20th century public health and medicine into a problem for the 21st century?

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Photo by: Stuart Kinmond

The nation's health bureaucrats and provincial health ministers insist an aging population will stress the health care system, if it doesn't cause its bankruptcy. Yes, we have an aging population. People are living later, not dying young, and this is a very good thing, not a problem.

The history of this alarmist demography is clear. It began with Erik K. Erikson's observation that, “an ever-increasing number of old people were found to represent a mass of elderlies rather than an elite of elders.”1 In 1987, Hastings Center ethicist Daniel Callahan saw this as a problem: society would be unable to afford pensions and health care for all these new oldsters.2 Colorado Gov. Richard D. Lamm enthusiastically agreed, famously arguing a “duty to die” to diminish costs of care for the frail and superannuated.3 Seniors became “greedy geezers” and the race was on to make them scapegoats for a range of social ills. A new social discipline, gerontology, was born and geriatric medicine became a board-certified specialty.

It is not that we can't afford senior care, but that we can't afford to be without these superannuated, socially active folk. They are active citizens who vote, volunteer and, in general, contribute more fully in many categories of social activity than younger folk.

Alarmist demographics like Callahan's and Lamm's are based on the statistical observation that, on average, care is more expensive in the last 6 months of a person's life than across prior decades of healthy life. Because seniors are statistically more likely to die sooner than younger folks — a coarse actuarial conclusion — their care is more likely to be more expensive than that of younger persons.

This is a “default assumption,” one that reflexively promotes unjustified assumptions. It is incorrect not only because many seniors require little care but also because many others require more. Caring for the average, over-65- year-old senior is less costly than caring for non-geriatric patients with HIV, with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, or a host of other chronic complaints; it is less costly than the average middle-aged transplant. Organ transplantation normally benefits the young, not the old, and nothing is more expensive than this procedure whose after-surgery costs often exceed those of the surgery itself. Care for the average senior is not a patch on that required by low-birth-weight infants, or those requiring neonatal surgery and extensive post-operative attention.

None of this is to suggest geriatric medicine is anything but critically important. It is to suggest that much of what we think of as geriatric is in fact medicine for fragile persons. Geriatric expertise in the maintenance of people with multiple conditions can serve the critically ill of every age.

Blaming people who are over the age of 65 for the rising costs of our publicly funded health care systems permits us to focus on one class of patients. In truth, health care is expensive at every age and not something to be begrudged anyone because of age. The alternative is that we should all die young, at the first hint of illness, or figure out how to live healthily and forever.

Footnotes

  • Have you got an opinion about this article? Post your views at www.cmaj.ca. Potential Salon contributors are welcome to send a query to salon{at}cma.ca.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Erikson EK. The Life Cycle Completed. New York: Norton; 1982.
  2. 2.↵
    Callahan D. Setting medical limits: medical goals for an aging society. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1987.
  3. 3.↵
    Lamm R D. Columbus and Copernicus: New wine in old wineskins. Mt. Sinai J Med 1989;56:23.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 179 (4)
CMAJ
Vol. 179, Issue 4
12 Aug 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
“When I'm 64”
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
“When I'm 64”
Tom Koch
CMAJ Aug 2008, 179 (4) 388; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081090

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
“When I'm 64”
Tom Koch
CMAJ Aug 2008, 179 (4) 388; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.081090
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Tables
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The law and physician-assisted dying
  • Care, compassion, respect
  • Revisiting Rodriguez
Show more Salon

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire