Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JPN
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • My Cart
  • Log in
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Med Life with Dr. Horton
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • Classified ads
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Activate online account
    • Look up login
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Members Corner
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
    • Activate subscription
    • Look up login
    • Manage account
    • Manage IPs
    • View Reports
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

Hospital standardized mortality ratios

Kaveh G. Shojania and Alan J. Forster
CMAJ November 04, 2008 179 (10) 1037; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1080102
Kaveh G. Shojania
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan J. Forster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

[The authors respond:]

The finding of higher rates of preventable deaths in hospitals with high mortality in the study by Dubois and colleagues1 applied only to the analysis of deaths from pneumonia, for which the physician reviewers exhibited very poor agreement (kappa = 0.11). Moreover, in citing Dubois and colleagues in our commentary,2 we did not presuppose that process problems constitute the gold standard for quality indicators. However, process change represents the major aspect of health care delivery under providers' control. If hospital standardized mortality ratios correlate poorly with the need for process changes (as in the study by Dubois and colleagues and a recent study from Ontario3), it remains unclear how hospital standardized mortality ratios can serve as a useful screen for quality problems.

Few would argue there are quality problems in the Canadian health care system. The Canadian Adverse Event Study found preventable events in every hospital studied.4 Ideally, all hospitals would accept these results as fact and undertake vigorous efforts to look for quality problems rather than wait for the results of their hospital standardized mortality ratios analysis. Given that this does not occur, one might argue for the use of a screening test, to engage hospitals.

However, as we outlined in our commentary, the hospital standardized mortality ratio has both low sensitivity and poor specificity for quality problems.2 This is not unheard of among screening tests. Despite terrible performance characteristics, the fecal occult blood test improves detection of colon cancer, presumably because the results of annual application of this test randomly scare sufficient numbers of patients into undergoing the test they should have agreed to undergo in the first place, namely colonoscopy.

Unfortunately, whereas colon cancer really does reside in the colon, most quality problems do not manifest themselves in the charts of deceased patients.5 Thus, rather than engaging hospitals in vigorous and effective detection of quality problems, promotion of hospital standardized mortality ratios focuses hospitals' attention on chart reviews of in-hospital deaths, which has all the inconvenience of colonoscopy but not comparable benefits.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Dubois RW, Rogers WH, Moxley JHD, et al. Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality? N Engl J Med 1987;317:1674-80.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Shojania KG, Forster AJ. Hospital mortality: when failure is not a good measure of success. CMAJ 2008;179:153-7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Guru V, Tu JV, Etchells E, et al. Relationship between preventability of death after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and all-cause risk-adjusted mortality rates. Circulation 2008;117:2969-76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ 2004;170:1678-86.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Bates DW, O'Neil AC, Petersen LA, et al. Evaluation of screening criteria for adverse events in medical patients. Med Care 1995;33:452-62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 179 (10)
CMAJ
Vol. 179, Issue 10
4 Nov 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hospital standardized mortality ratios
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
Citation Tools
Hospital standardized mortality ratios
Kaveh G. Shojania, Alan J. Forster
CMAJ Nov 2008, 179 (10) 1037; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080102

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
Hospital standardized mortality ratios
Kaveh G. Shojania, Alan J. Forster
CMAJ Nov 2008, 179 (10) 1037; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1080102
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Non-publication of tobacco funded research should extend to replacement nicotine studies funded by the drug industry
  • Scopus (1)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Avoiding harm to patients: properly calculating costs of harm
  • Continuity of care: the key in telemedicine
  • Open secret: Time of day matters in clinical practice
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Patient safety & quality improvement

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Videos
  • Alerts
  • RSS

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • CMA Members
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact

Copyright 2019, Joule Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

Powered by HighWire