Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
    • COVID-19 Articles
  • Authors & Reviewers
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
    • Patient engagement
  • Members & Subscribers
    • Benefits for CMA Members
    • CPD Credits for Members
    • Subscribe to CMAJ Print
    • Subscription Prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2023
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Editorial

A legislative failure of epidemic proportions

Amir Attaran
CMAJ July 01, 2008 179 (1) 9; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.080818
Amir Attaran LLB DPhil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

Thrice in a decade — in 1999, 2002 and now in 2008 — the Auditor General of Canada has slammed Ottawa and the provinces for doing an indolent job of protecting Canadians from epidemic emergencies. And thrice in a decade, she has been ignored.

Today, there is not a politician in the country who has not heard of SARS or avian influenza, and who is not aware that a massive epidemic or pandemic could kill tens or hundreds of thousands of Canadians within weeks or months. Yet the federal and provincial governments cannot agree on how they will share epidemiologic information in a disease outbreak.

While “epidemiologic information” sounds mundane, it is at the core of understanding the scope, focus and severity of an epidemic and what it will take to control it. Sometimes an epidemic's growth is exponential: 1 diseased person may infect 2, who infect 4, and so on. Each doubling (or worse) can take only days. There is no time in an emergency to haggle over access to epidemiologic information. Time lost is tantamount to lives lost.

These scientific realities are clear enough, but for the last decade Ottawa and the provinces have ignored them. Instead of building a system to rapidly share epidemiologic information — the better to coordinate a national and international response during crises — Canada's governments don't share. Consider what the Auditor General wrote in May 2008:

To obtain routine surveillance information, the [Public Health Agency of Canada] relies on the goodwill of the provinces and territories. However, due to gaps in its information-sharing agreements with them, it is not assured of receiving timely, accurate and complete information. A data-sharing agreement recently signed with Ontario re-established the regular flow of information about individual cases after two years when this flow was limited. However, the Agency has not reached similar data-sharing agreements with the remaining provinces and territories.1

Fully 12 of 13 provinces and territories are under no obligation to share information with the federal government or the rest of Canada during an outbreak. Only Ontario, humbled by the SARS epidemic, does so. When the World Health Organization (WHO) placed a travel advisory on Toronto, it was not because that city had an unparalleled number of SARS cases (Singapore had about the same), but because Ontario was coy about informing Ottawa of the epidemic's nosocomial and community reach.2

These concerns have been noted before. A decade ago, the Auditor General criticized our “lack of common standards and agreed-upon procedures for reporting [epidemic] information at the provincial and territorial levels.”3 Health Canada agreed and promised to “commence discussion of this important issue.”3 Discussion failed. At the rate of 1 province (Ontario) agreeing to share information in a decade, it will take until the next century to cover all of Canada.

To be fair, Parliament has taken some bold steps. If a chicken carrying avian influenza were found tomorrow, Ottawa would be ready. There are federal laws to inspect farms for disease, to quarantine them if need be and to punish anyone concealing the epidemic.4 But if a human carrying avian influenza were found, too bad.

We at CMAJ believe this is a national embarrassment. As explained by Wilson and colleagues5 in this issue, Canada has new, pressing obligations to the world to manage epidemics within its borders. Since discussion and negotiation with the provinces and territories has faltered, Ottawa must now legislate to compel them to share epidemiologic information in times of emergency.

Under Canada's constitution, Parliament has jurisdiction to legislate for emergencies, such as epidemics.6 It also may criminalize harmful conduct, such as concealing epidemiologic information. Federal laws already require disclosure of many types of public health information, such as the labelling of medicines. Surely Parliament can legislate to make epidemic information available too. Other countries, like the United States and Australia, have already done so.

Parliament's deference to the provinces on this issue has reached a ridiculous, potentially tragic, level. In a deadly epidemic, Ottawa's laws to protect Canadian poultry are stronger than its laws to protect Canadian people. Parliament must urgently legislate a way past the jurisdictional schisms before the Auditor General reminds us — again — that it is dangerously overdue. Or worse, before a deadly epidemic demonstrates our failures.

Footnotes

  • With the Editorial-Writing Team (Paul C. Hébert MD MHSc, Rajendra Kale MD, Matthew B. Stanbrook MD PhD, Barbara Sibbald BJ, Ken Flegel MDCM MSc and Noni MacDonald MD MSc)

    Competing interests: See www.cmaj.ca/misc/edboard.shtml.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    2008 May report of the Auditor General of Canada. Ottawa: Office of the Auditor General of Canada. Available: www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/aud_ch_oag_200805_05_e_30701.html#hd5o (accessed 2008 May 27).
  2. 2.↵
    National Advisory Committee on SARS and Public Health. Learning from SARS — renewal of public health in Canada. Ottawa: Health Canada; October 2003.
  3. 3.↵
    1999 September report of the Auditor General of Canada. Ottawa: Office of the Auditor General of Canada. Available: www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/aud_ch_oag_199909_14_e_10143.html#0.2.2Z141Z1.WEAMVH.CZQ0IF.R5 (accessed 2008 May 27).
  4. 4.↵
    Health of Animals Act, SC 1990, c 21.
  5. 5.↵
    Wilson K, von Tigerstrom B, McDougall C. Protecting global health security through the International Health Regulations: requirements and challenges. CMAJ 2008;179:44-8.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Attaran A, Wilson K. A legal and epidemiological justification for federal authority in public health emergencies. McGill Law J 2007;52:382-414.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 179 (1)
CMAJ
Vol. 179, Issue 1
1 Jul 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A legislative failure of epidemic proportions
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A legislative failure of epidemic proportions
Amir Attaran
CMAJ Jul 2008, 179 (1) 9; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080818

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
A legislative failure of epidemic proportions
Amir Attaran
CMAJ Jul 2008, 179 (1) 9; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080818
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Protecting global health security through the International Health Regulations: requirements and challenges
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Se preparer a la prochaine pandemie en creant la << Societe canadienne de limmunisation >>
  • Preparing for the next pandemic by creating Canadian Immunization Services
  • Disease surveillance
  • Disease surveillance
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • A focus on access to health care in Canada
  • L’avenir de la médecine est ici et vous en êtes la trame narrative
  • The future of medicine is here and you are its story
Show more Éditorial

Similar Articles

Collections

  • Topics
    • Canadian government
    • Infectious diseases

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • CPD credits
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2023, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire