Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Podcasts
    • Articles
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN

User menu

Search

  • Advanced search
CMAJ
  • CMAJ JOURNALS
    • CMAJ Open
    • CJS
    • JAMC
    • JPN
CMAJ

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • COVID-19
    • Podcasts
    • Articles
  • Content
    • Current issue
    • Past issues
    • Early releases
    • Collections
    • Sections
    • Blog
    • Infographics & illustrations
    • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Overview for authors
    • Submission guidelines
    • Submit a manuscript
    • Forms
    • Editorial process
    • Editorial policies
    • Peer review process
    • Publication fees
    • Reprint requests
    • Open access
  • CMA Members
    • Overview for members
    • Earn CPD Credits
    • Print copies of CMAJ
  • Subscribers
    • General information
    • View prices
  • Alerts
    • Email alerts
    • RSS
  • JAMC
    • À propos
    • Numéro en cours
    • Archives
    • Sections
    • Abonnement
    • Alertes
    • Trousse média 2022
  • Visit CMAJ on Facebook
  • Follow CMAJ on Twitter
  • Follow CMAJ on Pinterest
  • Follow CMAJ on Youtube
  • Follow CMAJ on Instagram
Letters

France's health care system

David S. Heath
CMAJ February 26, 2008 178 (5) 596; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1070166
David S. Heath MBChB
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • © 2008 Canadian Medical Association

Articles about health care in other countries are uncommon in CMAJ, so I was pleased to read the interesting News article about the French system.1 Alas, Christina Lopes presents misleading conclusions from the World Health Organization's 2000 report on international health care systems2 as have other commentators, including Michael Moore in his film Sicko.

It is misleading and simplistic to state that “the World Health Organization … anointed the French health care system as the best in the world” and that it “ranked Canada 30th in the same survey.” The World Health Organization report includes 9 tables with international rankings along with an additional summary table. France is ranked first in only 1 of the tables: Table 10, which indicates health system performance. This index was calculated by relating a country's overall health achievement to its expenditure on its health system. Simply put, France ranks first in efficiency.

According to the World Health Organization, one must measure 5 things to assess a health care system: the overall level of health, the distribution of health in the population, the system's level of responsiveness, the distribution of responsiveness and the distribution of financial contribution.2 The way in which the system deals with access to specialists and wait times, which Lopes highlights as a star feature of the French system, falls into the category of the system's level of responsiveness. The World Health Organization report combines these 5 features of a health care system into 1 composite measure, overall health system attainment, in Table 9. It is a country's ranking in Table 9, one can argue, that is the most important ranking: it provides an indication of how well the system works for the user. Canada ranks seventh in this table and France ranks sixth. Japan ranks first.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: None declared.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Lopes C. Health care in France: facing hard choices. CMAJ 2007:177;1167-9.
  2. 2.↵
    World Health Organization. The world health report 2000. Health systems: improving performance. Geneva: The Organization; 2000.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Canadian Medical Association Journal: 178 (5)
CMAJ
Vol. 178, Issue 5
26 Feb 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author

Article tools

Respond to this article
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
To sign up for email alerts or to access your current email alerts, enter your email address below:
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on CMAJ.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
France's health care system
(Your Name) has sent you a message from CMAJ
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the CMAJ web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
France's health care system
David S. Heath
CMAJ Feb 2008, 178 (5) 596; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1070166

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
‍ Request Permissions
Share
France's health care system
David S. Heath
CMAJ Feb 2008, 178 (5) 596; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.1070166
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Responses
  • Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Biased data lead to biased algorithms
  • Intrapartum ultrasonography may improve operative vaginal delivery outcomes in Canada
  • Low-dose ketamine in the prehospital setting
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

 

View Latest Classified Ads

Content

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Collections
  • Sections
  • Blog
  • Podcasts
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • Early releases

Information for

  • Advertisers
  • Authors
  • Reviewers
  • CMA Members
  • Media
  • Reprint requests
  • Subscribers

About

  • General Information
  • Journal staff
  • Editorial Board
  • Advisory Panels
  • Governance Council
  • Journal Oversight
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright and Permissions
  • Accessibiity
  • CMA Civility Standards
CMAJ Group

Copyright 2022, CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors. All rights reserved. ISSN 1488-2329 (e) 0820-3946 (p)

All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association or its subsidiaries.

To receive any of these resources in an accessible format, please contact us at CMAJ Group, 500-1410 Blair Towers Place, Ottawa ON, K1J 9B9; p: 1-888-855-2555; e: cmajgroup@cmaj.ca

Powered by HighWire